In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or
off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion
forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users
into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic
discussion. [From Wikipedia]

Does that answer your question?

DNFTT




"Meteorologist" wrote in message
...
On usenet for many, many years I have
repeatedly been accused of trolling. BTW
trolling means baiting.

Yet, the truth is that I consistently raise
controversial topics; it is NOT trolling; for example -

a) Christian Origins - Thiering Thesis
(See relevant Wikipedia article, if interested)
(Jesus Christ was originally an Essene who
split from the Essenes at his baptism in 29 AD
by John the Baptist to form the Christian Party)

b) Proposal - Qumran Community were Essenes
(Archaeology DOES support this conclusion)

c) Climate Science Debate; especially Dr. Svensmark
(I AM a meteorologist)

d) Marriage Reform
(As a psychologist, I once did marriage counseling
long ago)

Does the reader get the point at last?

Best,
David Christainsen

On Mar 28, 6:47*pm, "jbm" wrote:
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or
off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion
forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users
into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic
discussion. [From Wikipedia]

Does that answer your question?

DNFTT

"Meteorologist" wrote in message

...



On usenet for many, many years I have
repeatedly been accused of trolling. *BTW
trolling means baiting.

Yet, the truth is that I consistently raise
controversial topics; it is NOT trolling; for example -

a) Christian Origins - Thiering Thesis
(See relevant Wikipedia article, if interested)
(Jesus Christ was originally an Essene who
split from the Essenes at his baptism in 29 AD
by John the Baptist to form the Christian Party)

b) Proposal - Qumran Community were Essenes
(Archaeology DOES support this conclusion)

c) Climate Science Debate; especially Dr. Svensmark
(I AM a meteorologist)

d) Marriage Reform
(As a psychologist, I once did marriage counseling
long ago)

Does the reader get the point at last?

Best,
David Christainsen- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

However, the truth is an airtight defense against
ANY charge of trolling at any time and at any
place.

So, everything I wrote in my intitial post in this
thread is the truth. Get the point?

Further, I want you to know that on uk.sci.weather
I have something worthwhile to say about
Svensmark and Shaviv on the cosmic ray/cloud
cover connection for the climate science debate.
Get the point?

David Christainsen