http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/04/2...r-roy-spencer/

"You see, climate researchers are rather myopic. They think that the
only way for global-average temperatures to change is for the climate
system to be forced ‘externally’…by a change in the output of the sun,
or by a large volcanic eruption. These are events which occur external
to the normal, internal operation of the climate system.

But what they have ignored is the potential for the climate system to
cause its own climate change. Climate change is simply what the system
does, owing to its complex, dynamic, chaotic internal behavior."

"The experts have simply mixed up cause and effect when observing how
clouds and temperature vary. The book reveals a simple way to
determine the direction of causation from satellite observations of
global average temperature and cloud variations. And that new tool
should fundamentally change how we view the climate system.

Blunder also addresses a second major mistake that results from
ignoring the effect of natural cloud variations on temperatu it
results in the illusion that the climate system is very sensitive. The
experts claim that, since our climate system is very sensitive, then
our carbon dioxide emissions are all that is needed to explain global
warming. There is no need to look for alternative explanations."

"The supposed explanation that global warming is due to increasing
atmospheric carbon dioxide from our burning of fossil fuels turns out
to be based upon little more than circumstantial evidence. It is
partly a symptom of our rather primitive understanding of how the
climate system works."

-----

Would usenetters like to discuss this in
detail?

David Christainsen

On May 24, 3:37*pm, Phony Meteorologist
wrote:
http://wattsupwiththat. FLUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHH

Carl rides his hobbyhorse

Would usenetters like to discuss this in
detail?

Nope.

On May 24, 3:45*pm, Sir David wrote:
On May 24, 3:37*pm, Phony Meteorologist
wrote:

http://wattsupwiththat. FLUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHH

Carl rides his hobbyhorse

Would usenetters like to discuss this in
detail?

Nope.

Would Sir David re-consider? So, I suggest
that Sir David click my link and read it.

David Christainsen

On May 25, 9:41*am, Meteorologist wrote:
On May 24, 3:45*pm, Sir David wrote:

On May 24, 3:37*pm, Phony Meteorologist
wrote:

http://wattsupwiththat. FLUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHH

Carl rides his hobbyhorse

Would usenetters like to discuss this in
detail?

Nope.

Would Sir David re-consider? *

Nope. Would Davey like to ask a mental
health professional why Davey likes to
address people in the third person? Probably
not, Davey's afraid of the truth

So, I suggest
that Sir David click my link and read it.

Repeating the same crap over and over doesn't
make it more interesting or relevant, Davey boy.

On May 25, 5:01*pm, Sir David wrote:
On May 25, 9:41*am, Meteorologist wrote:

On May 24, 3:45*pm, Sir David wrote:

On May 24, 3:37*pm, Phony Meteorologist
wrote:

http://wattsupwiththat. FLUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHH

Carl rides his hobbyhorse

Would usenetters like to discuss this in
detail?

Nope.

Would Sir David re-consider? *

Nope.

Well then, take the consequences; you did it
to yourself.

Would Davey like to ask a mental
health professional why Davey likes to
address people in the third person?

No.

Probably
not, Davey's afraid of the truth

Bogus.

So, I suggest
that Sir David click my link and read it.

Repeating the same crap over and over doesn't
make it more interesting or relevant, Davey boy.

You are ignorant and bigoted here.

David Christainsen