On Dec 31, 10:07*am, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Dec 30, 9:49*pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Dec 30, 9:32*pm, "Togless" wrote:

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
eb.com...
Interesting I'll need to watch it several times.

http://www.accuweather.com/video/732...lobe-will-(is)...

An awful lot of handwaving from Joe in this video, and I can't understand
why he's attributing the warming of the last three decades to the PDO when
it appears to me that the PDO index has been *declining* over this period,
not increasing (i.e. a cooling trend) -

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/jis...le:100/offset:....

and:

http://jisao.washington.edu/pdo/img/pdo_latest.jpeg

There has been a negative PDO for around 5 (ish) years now. Many were
pointing to this change as a reason why the world would start to get
cooler. Many are very quiet on the subject now. Roy Spencer is a case
in point.

http://jisao.washington.edu/pdo/PDO.latest

I just don't think *******i understands the supposed relationship.
(and it really is a tenuous one). That's why he's waving his hands
about.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Didn't you think Roy Spencer was an actor? It's really you who are the
thespian- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's no-one's fault but your own if you decide to play the idiot.
Anyone can see from the jisao link (above) that the PDO has been
negative for the last 5 years, so why haven't global temperatures
fallen during that period and why is *******i now trying to use this
as a reason for predicting that global temperatures are about to fall?
Surely they should have already fallen?