It would seem what was seen a a marked colling in the near surdface
temperature record is now possibly a faullt with that particular channel
being closed pending investigation

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutem....csh?amsutemps

The data for 2010 is now in and it is almost identical to 1998.
http://www.drroyspencer.com/

Roy Spencer is saying only trust channel five but I was convinced that he
once said only trust channel 4?

Have I got that totally wrong?

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
eb.com...
It would seem what was seen a a marked colling in the near surdface
temperature record is now possibly a faullt with that particular channel
being closed pending investigation

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutem....csh?amsutemps

The data for 2010 is now in and it is almost identical to 1998.
http://www.drroyspencer.com/

Roy Spencer is saying only trust channel five but I was convinced that he
once said only trust channel 4?

Have I got that totally wrong?



I also note that Joe *******i showed channel four today when saying how the
temperatures had dropped so rapidly, so Joe like me used as recommended by
Roy Spencer , channel four not five as Roy Spencer is now recommending. I
did pose in two recent posts that possibly channel four was showing a fault
which is now the case.

So two issues here for me.
Will Joe mention in the next video that the AMSU CHNL 4 data he showed today
http://www.accuweather.com/video/736...annel=vbbastaj
at 2:00

and did Roy Spencer actually say in the recent past that the only reliable
amsu channel was 4 which Joe has been using; yet today Roy Spencer is now
saying use only channel five which I believed as advised by Roy Spencer, to
be unreliable as well in the not two distant past.

Hmmm something seems to be fishy about all this.


was faultywas faulty and we should take no notice of it