Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the
rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave Cornwell writes: It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one 24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal. -- John Hall "The covers of this book are too far apart." Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Hall wrote:
In article , Dave Cornwell writes: It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one 24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal. ------------------ It is very common. Sometimes there is a north or south bias (not geographically but above and below the mean)within the spread. In this case although also fairly common, does show cold is just as likely an outcome in the reasonably near future. I don't really know why I posted this as it's pretty obvious! I sometimes use this medium so my mental ramblings have an outlet! Dave |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Peturbations, are you sure? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... John Hall wrote: In article , Dave Cornwell writes: It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one 24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal. ------------------ It is very common. Sometimes there is a north or south bias (not geographically but above and below the mean)within the spread. In this case although also fairly common, does show cold is just as likely an outcome in the reasonably near future. I don't really know why I posted this as it's pretty obvious! I sometimes use this medium so my mental ramblings have an outlet! Dave Far more people live in the South, its called proportional representation. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Peturbations, are you sure? Indeed I am Mastur Lawrence ;-) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave Cornwell writes: John Hall wrote: In article , Dave Cornwell writes: It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one 24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal. ------------------ It is very common. Sometimes there is a north or south bias (not geographically but above and below the mean)within the spread. In this case although also fairly common, does show cold is just as likely an outcome in the reasonably near future. I don't really know why I posted this as it's pretty obvious! I sometimes use this medium so my mental ramblings have an outlet! Dave ![]() With the 00Z GFS ensemble there's a definite bias towards mild. One other thought. When the ensemble mean is close to the long-term mean there are often more mild members in the ensemble than there are cold ones. That's because 1 or 2 cold members are often at -10 or -15, whilst it's rare for a mild member to be as much above the mean as that. So the ensemble median tends to be rather higher than its mean. -- John Hall "The covers of this book are too far apart." Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Lawrence Jenkins writes: "Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Peturbations, are you sure? Aren't they dogs and cats living in towns? ![]() -- John Hall "The covers of this book are too far apart." Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... Lawrence Jenkins wrote: "Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Peturbations, are you sure? Indeed I am Mastur Lawrence ;-) Meant to sat R you sure and besides that would have been rich coming from me the king of 26 letters in the alphabet but not all in the particularly the right place. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 30, 1:06*am, Dave Cornwell wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins wrote: "Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence. Dave Peturbations, are you sure? Indeed I am Mastur Lawrence ;-) Good job he's not called Lawrence Bates! I'm of a mind that the unsettled weather will continue, but the I'm also of a mind that determining temperature detail is not possible at that distance, Will disagrees and has gone for colder westerlies, but again, he might be over-egging the likelihood of those downstream possibilities that he discussed (very informative, BTW) affecting the UK in that way. The charts don't really suggest anything that cold, but it's not an all-mild outlook, by any means - especially on the higher ground of northern Britain. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cloudy after a bright start in Brussels: light rain after dark | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[OBS] Copley 8th February | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The day after tomorrow after tomorrow | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Copley 8th February | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Bashir Salamati (Bushy Salami) drops out of site after wrongly accusing and attacking individuals and competitors! Bushy's motives were identified after he attacked two individuals and Belfort Instruments! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |