uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 29th 11, 09:49 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,488
Default After February 8th

It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the
rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave

  #2   Report Post  
Old January 29th 11, 10:02 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,314
Default After February 8th

In article ,
Dave Cornwell writes:
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the
rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave


Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big
spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's
going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one
24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal.
--
John Hall

"The covers of this book are too far apart."
Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 29th 11, 10:39 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,488
Default After February 8th

John Hall wrote:
In article ,
Dave Cornwell writes:
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the
rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave


Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big
spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's
going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one
24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal.

------------------
It is very common. Sometimes there is a north or south bias (not
geographically but above and below the mean)within the spread. In this
case although also fairly common, does show cold is just as likely an
outcome in the reasonably near future. I don't really know why I posted
this as it's pretty obvious! I sometimes use this medium so my mental
ramblings have an outlet!
Dave
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 29th 11, 11:07 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default After February 8th


"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest
of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave



Peturbations, are you sure?


  #5   Report Post  
Old January 29th 11, 11:09 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default After February 8th


"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
John Hall wrote:
In article ,
Dave Cornwell writes:
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the
rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave


Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big
spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's
going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one
24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal.

------------------
It is very common. Sometimes there is a north or south bias (not
geographically but above and below the mean)within the spread. In this
case although also fairly common, does show cold is just as likely an
outcome in the reasonably near future. I don't really know why I posted
this as it's pretty obvious! I sometimes use this medium so my mental
ramblings have an outlet!
Dave


Far more people live in the South, its called proportional representation.




  #6   Report Post  
Old January 30th 11, 01:06 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,488
Default After February 8th

Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest
of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave



Peturbations, are you sure?


Indeed I am Mastur Lawrence ;-)
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 30th 11, 10:37 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,314
Default After February 8th

In article ,
Dave Cornwell writes:
John Hall wrote:
In article ,
Dave Cornwell writes:
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the
rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave

Looking at the 12Z GFS 850mb temps for London, there's a fairly big
spread from about the 5th. That's fairly common. Looks like there's
going to be a fairly chilly day or so around the 4th and a very mild one
24-48 hours later. After that, as you say, there's no clear signal.

------------------
It is very common. Sometimes there is a north or south bias (not
geographically but above and below the mean)within the spread. In this
case although also fairly common, does show cold is just as likely an
outcome in the reasonably near future. I don't really know why I posted
this as it's pretty obvious! I sometimes use this medium so my mental
ramblings have an outlet!
Dave




With the 00Z GFS ensemble there's a definite bias towards mild.

One other thought. When the ensemble mean is close to the long-term mean
there are often more mild members in the ensemble than there are cold
ones. That's because 1 or 2 cold members are often at -10 or -15, whilst
it's rare for a mild member to be as much above the mean as that. So the
ensemble median tends to be rather higher than its mean.
--
John Hall

"The covers of this book are too far apart."
Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 30th 11, 10:37 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,314
Default After February 8th

In article ,
Lawrence Jenkins writes:

"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest
of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave



Peturbations, are you sure?


Aren't they dogs and cats living in towns?
--
John Hall

"The covers of this book are too far apart."
Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 30th 11, 11:04 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default After February 8th


"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the
rest of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave



Peturbations, are you sure?

Indeed I am Mastur Lawrence ;-)


Meant to sat R you sure and besides that would have been rich coming from me
the king of 26 letters in the alphabet but not all in the particularly the
right place.


  #10   Report Post  
Old January 30th 11, 01:12 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default After February 8th

On Jan 30, 1:06*am, Dave Cornwell wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
It looks like we will have some better idea after that date what the rest
of the month holds. When the ensembles are that split the mean is
meaningless. (excuse the play on words!). At the moment it it is saying
there is about a 33% percent chance of it being either cold, average or
mild from the 8th, which is quite different from assuming an average of
all of the peturbations for which there is little confidence.
Dave


Peturbations, are you sure?


Indeed I am Mastur Lawrence ;-)


Good job he's not called Lawrence Bates!

I'm of a mind that the unsettled weather will continue, but the I'm
also of a mind that determining temperature detail is not possible at
that distance, Will disagrees and has gone for colder westerlies, but
again, he might be over-egging the likelihood of those downstream
possibilities that he discussed (very informative, BTW) affecting the
UK in that way. The charts don't really suggest anything that cold,
but it's not an all-mild outlook, by any means - especially on the
higher ground of northern Britain.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cloudy after a bright start in Brussels: light rain after dark Colin Youngs[_3_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 November 4th 16 08:16 PM
[OBS] Copley 8th February Ken Cook uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 February 8th 09 12:21 PM
The day after tomorrow after tomorrow Will Hand uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 13 December 24th 08 12:49 PM
Copley 8th February Ken Cook uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 February 8th 08 01:19 PM
Bashir Salamati (Bushy Salami) drops out of site after wrongly accusing and attacking individuals and competitors! Bushy's motives were identified after he attacked two individuals and Belfort Instruments! [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 2 January 22nd 06 06:10 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017