Panic !!

http://www.weatheraction.com/display....asp?a=309&c=5

Richard

Richard Dixon wrote:
Panic !!

http://www.weatheraction.com/display....asp?a=309&c=5


And yet they can't resist shoving their anti-AGW agenda all over
the article. But there's nothing new in that of course.

And to think that the anti-AGW brigade complain about the
'propaganda' of the pro-warmers.....
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

On 17/02/2011 18:26, Col wrote:
Richard Dixon wrote:
Panic !!

http://www.weatheraction.com/display....asp?a=309&c=5

And yet they can't resist shoving their anti-AGW agenda all over
the article. But there's nothing new in that of course.

How odd that he can't predict these CMEs in advance if his forecasting
system is based on solar activity.

It has the potential to create an aurora that might be visible from the
UK in the next few nights. But that is about all it will do. Might add a
bit of extra atmospheric drag to the ISS and reduce the astronauts
fertility too. Depends how hard it hits us - it is still very feeble now

http://hfradio.org/aurora_globe.html

Keep an eye out if the skies are clear.

And to think that the anti-AGW brigade complain about the
'propaganda' of the pro-warmers.....

Corbyn is one of the most monumental "weather prediction" charlatans the
UK has ever produced. The Red Tops seem to love him for his wild claims.
Only screaming Lord Monckton is more detached from reality.

Corbyn does a wonderful line in ambiguous fortune teller predictions
along the lines of "it will rain or go dark before morning".

Regards,
Martin Brown

"Richard Dixon" wrote in message
...
Panic !!

http://www.weatheraction.com/display....asp?a=309&c=5

Richard


OMG OMG OMG :-O

Will
--

On Feb 17, 6:11*pm, Richard Dixon wrote:
Panic !!

http://www.weatheraction.com/display....asp?a=309&c=5

Richard

Lots of snow and gales for us then. Doesn't say when. Doesn't look
like either will occur.

If they don't.......I'll bet he doesn't return to this on his site.
He'll hope most people will quickly forget about it - and they will -
they'll just remember Piers Corbyn, Weather Action (maybe) and the
sensaitional headline. As a result, and not caring much about it,
they'll probably think he's been correct (again).........even before
the forecast has achieved outcome.

That's how charlatans work. They make outrageous forecasts, don't
return to them, unless they happen to turn out correct, make another
one soon and claim the previous correct ones represent their
forecasting abilities.

It's just crap really, isn't it?