On Jul 16, 9:05*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Jul 16, 8:26*pm, Rupert Wood wrote:





On Jul 17, 3:21*am, "alt.stupid.denier.nutter"

wrote:
N U T T E R

S T U P I D

WHINE WHINE
WHINE WHINE
WHINE WHINE
WHINE WHINE
WHINE WHINE

CRY BABY

On 16/07/2011 4:17 PM, Dawlish wrote:
England."

It was on June 7, when there were a lot of people, one prominently on
here, that were applying persistence to the conditions through May and
coming up with severe drought for the SE. The conditions were changing
as the hack wrote and the MetO had already picked up a change in its
forecasts, though the drought orders were issued when particular
criteria had been fulfilled. The difficulty is in the accuracy of long-
term forecasts, which is poor.

This was a Guardian hack who doesn't understand anything about long-
term forecasting accuracy, or its difficulties ( and it would have
"stuck in my craw" as well)..............but neither, unfortunately,
do you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you mental issues congenital?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Would you like to try that again when your'e sober.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Lawrence: always best to find the right version of you're (not your'e)
when trying to mock someone's typo on the word you(r), I find.

Would you like to try that one again, drunk, or sober? *)) (note the
smiley)

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
The MetO were absolutely correct to issue drought warnings at the time,

The MetO don't issue drought warnings - they supply rainfall data to the
Environment Agency, and the EA use this data together with soil moisture
defecit data to decide to issue a drought order. AFAIK no-one issues
drought warnings - just statements of fact that a drought is actually
occurring.

Freddie.
Bayston Hill,
Shropshire.
http://www.hosiene.co.uk/weather/cumulus/