On Sep 27, 5:23*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/mapping/

I have just been playing with it; it makes the situation for any
particular day so easy to understand.

NEIC one, NEIC!

Zero is today and you can adjust that to six with the other box
adjusted to seven you get the score for a week back.
A day by day map that delves into the archives would be worth more
than gold.

I'd forgive the US National debt for that and forgive Dubya,#

#Only kidding, dickhead is still on the hit list for when I rule the
world.

The map is going to replace the one on the "present time" list.
You can leave a comment on the test site.

If they incorporate a way to show the distances of 60 and 80 degrees
out from the epicentres it will make me a star.
So that won't happen while I am alive. Not in a world ruled by people
like Tory B Liar and the chimpanzee.

Thank you for preventing our new earthquake mapping interface. All
feedback is generated. For Help see your physician.

duhduhduh, WL, bring me into the picture here. Is this Beta map a
replacement for the global globular map ? or has the Beta run with the
globe map uh 'all along' and I haven't accessed that...? the flack
does read NEW as if there is an old old old Beta.

what the hell do yawl do with a flat earth map ?

NOAA tried this....offering a technical obfuscation map throwing
meteorology into the DARK AGES.
\
YECH

maybe I'm simple minded ?


http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...quakes_big.php
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...10/165_-10.php

On Sep 29, 3:12*am, kolldata wrote:

WL, *bring me into the picture here. Is this Beta map a
replacement for the global globular map ?

I wish I could but I only understand my own brand of garble.

Care to try again. I seem to remember you were almost articulate
recently. Or maybe it was the meeting of two broken minds?

On Sep 30, 8:41*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Sep 29, 3:12*am, kolldata wrote:



WL, *bring me into the picture here. Is this Beta map a
replacement for the global globular map ?

I wish I could but I only understand my own brand of garble.

Care to try again. I seem to remember you were almost articulate
recently. Or maybe it was the meeting of two broken minds?

i'm using the global map to globally understand the global earthquake
picture, that is comma GLOBALLY.

NOT AWARE THE FLAT MAP EXISTED and now here's an updated FLAT MAP with
a horde of flat mappers drouling over its new flat features anf for
the life of me I can;t figure what I'm missing out on here.

what does a flat map do for you the global map doesn.t supply ?

On Oct 1, 5:15*am, kolldata wrote:
On Sep 30, 8:41*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Sep 29, 3:12*am, kolldata wrote:

WL, *bring me into the picture here. Is this Beta map a
replacement for the global globular map ?

I wish I could but I only understand my own brand of garble.

Care to try again. I seem to remember you were almost articulate
recently. Or maybe it was the meeting of two broken minds?

I'm using the global map to globally understand the global earthquake
picture, that is comma GLOBALLY.

This is a Global site.
For Global people!

There is nothing for YOU here.

NOT AWARE THE FLAT MAP EXISTED and now here's an updated FLAT MAP with
a horde of flat mappers drewling over its new flat features and for
the life of me, I can't figure what I'm missing out on *here.

what does a flat map do for you the global map doesn.t supply ?

I believe that all maps by definition are flat. I may be wrong.
A globe is by definition globular. I am certain about that.

It is very difficult to represent one on the other and asking for the
USGS to allow the use of bands to indicate distances 80 and 60 degrees
from epicentres is not a small thing.

The map at the present on the top of the NEIC lists is not the map I
am talking about and -as is so often the case with you, I have no idea
what you are talking about and asking usually gets a more screwed up
reply.

You could open this link I presume?
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/mapping/

http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=htt...islOO8GH4-IL5A

I unlike you, once I have ascertained the enquirer is genuine, will
endeavour to oblige with a more basic explanation that that to which I
have become adept.

If you care to run your peepers over the map given, you shoud see a
Java script controller -or a controller of the code they are using. It
behaves like Java so...

Anyway, they are asking for per to change things to suit us which is a
first, AFAIK.

On Oct 1, 7:46*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 1, 5:15*am, kolldata wrote:

On Sep 30, 8:41*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Sep 29, 3:12*am, kolldata wrote:

WL, *bring me into the picture here. Is this Beta map a
replacement for the global globular map ?

I wish I could but I only understand my own brand of garble.

Care to try again. I seem to remember you were almost articulate
recently. Or maybe it was the meeting of two broken minds?

I'm using the global map to globally understand the global earthquake
picture, that is comma GLOBALLY.

This is a Global site.
For Global people!

There is nothing for YOU here.

NOT AWARE THE FLAT MAP EXISTED and now here's an updated FLAT MAP with
a horde of flat mappers drewling over its new flat features and for
the life of me, I can't figure what I'm missing out on *here.

what does a flat map do for you the global map doesn.t supply ?

I believe that all maps by definition are flat. I may be wrong.
A globe is by definition globular. I am certain about that.

It is very difficult to represent one on the other and asking for the
USGS to allow the use of bands to indicate distances 80 and 60 degrees
from epicentres is not a small thing.

The map at the present on the top of the NEIC lists is not the map I
am talking about and -as is so often the case with you, I have no idea
what you are talking about and asking *usually gets a more screwed up
reply.

You could open this link I presume?

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/mapping/
http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=htt....gov/earthquak...

I unlike you, once I have ascertained the enquirer is genuine, will
endeavour to oblige with a more basic explanation that that to which I
have become adept.

If you care to run your peepers over the map given, you shoud see a
Java script controller -or a controller of the code they are using. It
behaves like Java so...

Anyway, they are asking for per to change things to suit us which is a
first, AFAIK.

hmmmmmm. OK, I'll take a look at the flat map soon. NOAA predicts rain
for the Great North Wes leaving time and energy.

maybe work up a survey and send it to flat map users ?

Yawl use flat maps ? Incroyable.

you did see NOAA's NEW MAP PRESENTATION ?

The map was sooooooooooooooooooo bad, NOAA's reasons for presenting it
were suspect


but living here in the Great North West for a time after
Florida.....Florida's NOAA forecasts are dead on due to the hurricane
staff for east coast predictions.

out here forecasting is variable from excellent to uncertain moistly
taking predicitons from time speed radar of the great arms of the
bearing sea.

ahhhh Santorum is running


incroyable !


http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...ho/270_-90.php

ok that's an informative map maybe I'll get over the flat
migraine....why not click MAP TYPE and go global ? 0

where are animated wave functions ?

does the flat approach replace my need for recording 'vanatu to
honshu' simplifed example off course... ??