Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 1:02*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Nov 26, 11:42*am, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Nov 3, 2:39*am, Skywise wrote: Flattery will get you nowhere, Mike. :~) It looks like there is more on the table for those who have already had a plateful. http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/bl...november-2011-... Just off to look at the Tornado reports for the preceding. Nothing showing so far but I neglected them for the other stuff. Without a Greenland High, US tornadoes are unlikely. And so it proved. However there are a couple of posts on UK.sci.weather reporting a warm front at mdnight. I still have a blocking low going on in the northern hemisphere but have reconsidered my POV regarding earthquakes: http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/bl...november-2011-... Suppose that earthquakes behave exactly the same way that weather does. If that is the case then they will be subject to the weather's hemisphere laws. There has been considerable contusion around Antarctica and such bruising tends to produce clots. Not being one myself I could sit back and think about it. It certainly fits the pictures. All of them. I have just plotted the major earthquakes ofr this spell so far and found a surprising result. 1. Seven of them are on a Thirteen degree arc, centred just off the coast of South Korea. 2. Thirteen degrees is the same arc that describes Australia. I wrote a blog about that about an year ago. 3. The Mayanmar/China quake is just off the arc by a couple or so degrees. 4. Six of them (five + the Mayanmar one) are on a perfectly straight line running at a tangent to that arc making a P shape. (q shaped actually but a capital Q isn't the same.) 5. The Svalbard quake is about 90 degrees from the centre of the circular set. 6. The Svalbard quake runs in a straight line through the Japanese quake to one in the middle of Papua New Guinea. 7. The Svalbard quake is ninety degrees from the Ascension Island quake. 8. The three remaining quakes (South and Central America) are on a similar arc to the other one (just over thirteen degrees this time) with the centre about the same distance from Svalbard. The distances are very approximate as the quakes occurred in clumps - as is the way with such things. I find this stuff fascinating. http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/bl...omment75989452 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lenticular Blocking Lows | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Blocking Lows have little Lows | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
'Heat lows' turning into deep Atlantic lows | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Blocking low, exist? (I love some aspects of sitting lows) | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Blocking in autumn | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |