On Oct 18, 5:36*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Oct 18, 6:29*am, Dawlish wrote:





On Oct 17, 5:47*pm, Dawlish wrote:

Probably model fluff, but you can imagine the scurrying and
speculation amongst the coldies if these charts cropped up on 2 models
in January - even if it was for just one run on each!!

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm2402.gif

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

3 consecutive gfs runs and 2 consecutive ECM runs. Still low
probability, but a Scandinavian high is still showing on the charts
and is shown stalling the passage of Atlantic depressions over the UK
on both models at T240 and creating the classic battleground
conditions.

PS Yesterday's was posted to pre-empt and dissuade the coldies from
doing what they annoy many of us to death with each winter, shouting
"EASTERLIES" every time a Scandinavian high shows in the far reaches
of gfs. Today we have the backing of a few runs, but it's only low
probability still. It'll need two more gfs runs before I become
properly interested.

Everything annoys you. People have all the right to get excited about
easterlies at this time of year if annoys you to death *then don't
read the posts. It's that simple.

As for your reason for posting about the same subject yesterday, why
it's just plain pathetic blather from the king of blatherer's. I mean
if you are so sickened by seeing posts about Easterlies then why oh
why would you post this thread headliner below.

"Easterlies at T240 with a Scandinavian High??"

seems rather illogical to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hilarious. laughing

oh we know you are.
always talkin out of youre arse, you know, the crack that spews all your
fluff on here.

bum fluff.

On 18/10/2011 7:51 PM, Dawlish wrote:

Hilarious.laughing

On Oct 18, 7:51*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Oct 18, 5:36*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:





On Oct 18, 6:29*am, Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 17, 5:47*pm, Dawlish wrote:

Probably model fluff, but you can imagine the scurrying and
speculation amongst the coldies if these charts cropped up on 2 models
in January - even if it was for just one run on each!!

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm2402.gif

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

3 consecutive gfs runs and 2 consecutive ECM runs. Still low
probability, but a Scandinavian high is still showing on the charts
and is shown stalling the passage of Atlantic depressions over the UK
on both models at T240 and creating the classic battleground
conditions.

PS Yesterday's was posted to pre-empt and dissuade the coldies from
doing what they annoy many of us to death with each winter, shouting
"EASTERLIES" every time a Scandinavian high shows in the far reaches
of gfs. Today we have the backing of a few runs, but it's only low
probability still. It'll need two more gfs runs before I become
properly interested.

Everything annoys you. People have all the right to get excited about
easterlies at this time of year if annoys you to death *then don't
read the posts. It's that simple.

As for your reason for posting about the same subject yesterday, why
it's just plain pathetic blather from the king of blatherer's. I mean
if you are so sickened by seeing posts about Easterlies then why oh
why would you post this thread headliner below.

"Easterlies at T240 with a Scandinavian High??"

seems rather illogical to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hilarious. laughing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are a failed teacher who's turned their hand to school inspection
or consultation, who ironically tries to get schools past the
bureaucratic idiots like yourself who now run this country. That
explains why you have the mentality of a traffic warden with a slight
learning disability; because that is your level, someone who would
have thrived in the Stasi.

On Oct 18, 11:16*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Oct 18, 7:51*pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Oct 18, 5:36*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:

On Oct 18, 6:29*am, Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 17, 5:47*pm, Dawlish wrote:

Probably model fluff, but you can imagine the scurrying and
speculation amongst the coldies if these charts cropped up on 2 models
in January - even if it was for just one run on each!!

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm2402.gif

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

3 consecutive gfs runs and 2 consecutive ECM runs. Still low
probability, but a Scandinavian high is still showing on the charts
and is shown stalling the passage of Atlantic depressions over the UK
on both models at T240 and creating the classic battleground
conditions.

PS Yesterday's was posted to pre-empt and dissuade the coldies from
doing what they annoy many of us to death with each winter, shouting
"EASTERLIES" every time a Scandinavian high shows in the far reaches
of gfs. Today we have the backing of a few runs, but it's only low
probability still. It'll need two more gfs runs before I become
properly interested.

Everything annoys you. People have all the right to get excited about
easterlies at this time of year if annoys you to death *then don't
read the posts. It's that simple.

As for your reason for posting about the same subject yesterday, why
it's just plain pathetic blather from the king of blatherer's. I mean
if you are so sickened by seeing posts about Easterlies then why oh
why would you post this thread headliner below.

"Easterlies at T240 with a Scandinavian High??"

seems rather illogical to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hilarious. laughing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are a failed teacher who's turned their hand to school inspection
or consultation, who ironically tries to *get schools past the
bureaucratic idiots like yourself who now run this country. That
explains *why you have the mentality of a traffic warden with a slight
learning disability; *because that is your level, someone who would
have thrived in the Stasi.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just abuse.

On Oct 19, 6:19*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Oct 18, 11:16*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:





On Oct 18, 7:51*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 18, 5:36*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:

On Oct 18, 6:29*am, Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 17, 5:47*pm, Dawlish wrote:

Probably model fluff, but you can imagine the scurrying and
speculation amongst the coldies if these charts cropped up on 2 models
in January - even if it was for just one run on each!!

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm2402.gif

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

3 consecutive gfs runs and 2 consecutive ECM runs. Still low
probability, but a Scandinavian high is still showing on the charts
and is shown stalling the passage of Atlantic depressions over the UK
on both models at T240 and creating the classic battleground
conditions.

PS Yesterday's was posted to pre-empt and dissuade the coldies from
doing what they annoy many of us to death with each winter, shouting
"EASTERLIES" every time a Scandinavian high shows in the far reaches
of gfs. Today we have the backing of a few runs, but it's only low
probability still. It'll need two more gfs runs before I become
properly interested.

Everything annoys you. People have all the right to get excited about
easterlies at this time of year if annoys you to death *then don't
read the posts. It's that simple.

As for your reason for posting about the same subject yesterday, why
it's just plain pathetic blather from the king of blatherer's. I mean
if you are so sickened by seeing posts about Easterlies then why oh
why would you post this thread headliner below.

"Easterlies at T240 with a Scandinavian High??"

seems rather illogical to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hilarious. laughing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are a failed teacher who's turned their hand to school inspection
or consultation, who ironically tries to *get schools past the
bureaucratic idiots like yourself who now run this country. That
explains *why you have the mentality of a traffic warden with a slight
learning disability; *because that is your level, someone who would
have thrived in the Stasi.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just abuse.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes it was . Accept my humble apologies .