EVERY YEAR ITS GETTING COLDER

THE LITTLE ICE AGE IS COMING

ALL YOU AGW NUTTER DENIERS GO FLUFF YOURSELF

ITS ALL TRUE

LOOK AT CNN

On Oct 31, 10:04*pm, Visage 3:16 wrote:
EVERY YEAR ITS GETTING COLDER

THE LITTLE ICE AGE IS COMING

ALL YOU AGW NUTTER DENIERS GO FLUFF YOURSELF

ITS ALL TRUE

LOOK AT CNN

Get in there son.......

Please look at those satellite temps I linked just before you posted.

"Visage 3:16" wrote:

EVERY YEAR ITS GETTING COLDER

THE LITTLE ICE AGE IS COMING

Really?

2008: 0.44°C
2009: 0.57°C
2010: 0.63°C

(GISTEMP Jan-Dec annual mean, anomalies from 1951 - 1980 baseline).

On Nov 1, 11:04*am, Visage 3:16 wrote:
EVERY YEAR ITS GETTING COLDER

THE LITTLE ICE AGE IS COMING

ALL YOU AGW NUTTER DENIERS GO FLUFF YOURSELF

ITS ALL TRUE

LOOK AT CNN

Get a brain transplant.

PS - shouting in capitals doesn't turn false propositions into true
ones.

On Oct 31, 10:09*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Oct 31, 10:04*pm, Visage 3:16 wrote:

EVERY YEAR ITS GETTING COLDER

THE LITTLE ICE AGE IS COMING

ALL YOU AGW NUTTER DENIERS GO FLUFF YOURSELF

ITS ALL TRUE

LOOK AT CNN

Get in there son.......

Please look at those satellite temps I linked just before you posted.

"One weather event proves nothing about climate change."

"I know that John I was being tongue in cheek."

No you weren't. Like every climate denier you think this unusual
colder, local, temporary weather is important and an indicator that
the climate is getting colder. It isn't.

Forecast temperatures for NYC for the next 10 days are below - 12-15C
every day. The average for NYC at this time of year is about 12C.

You have plummeted into the weather is climate trap, larry. Climate
deniers like you just can't help themselves, because they are actually
silly enough to believe that local, temporary cold means something.
I'm afraid that it doesn't. *))

("get in there son")

http://uk.weather.com/weather/10day-New-York-USNY0996

No you weren't. Like every climate denier you think this unusual
colder, local, temporary weather is important and an indicator that
the climate is getting colder. It isn't.

Forecast temperatures for NYC for the next 10 days are below - 12-15C
every day. The average for NYC at this time of year is about 12C.

You have plummeted into the weather is climate trap, larry. Climate
deniers like you just can't help themselves, because they are actually
silly enough to believe that local, temporary cold means something.
I'm afraid that it doesn't. *))

("get in there son")

http://uk.weather.com/weather/10day-New-York-USNY0996

Can I persuade you Paul to ditch the ridiculous and meaningless label of
'climate denier' in your posts - it really is inappropriate in a
scientific argument. Please substitute AGW denier if you must
pigeon-hole.

James
--
James Brown

On Nov 1, 1:30*pm, James Brown
wrote:
No you weren't. Like every climate denier you think this unusual
colder, local, temporary weather is important and an indicator that
the climate is getting colder. It isn't.

Forecast temperatures for NYC for the next 10 days are below - 12-15C
every day. The average for NYC at this time of year is about 12C.

You have plummeted into the weather is climate trap, larry. Climate
deniers like you just can't help themselves, because they are actually
silly enough to believe that local, temporary cold means something.
I'm afraid that it doesn't. *))

("get in there son")

http://uk.weather.com/weather/10day-New-York-USNY0996

Can I persuade you Paul to ditch the ridiculous and meaningless label of
'climate denier' in your posts - it really is inappropriate in a
scientific argument. Please substitute AGW denier if you must
pigeon-hole.

James
--
James Brown

sorry James, no. I don't use it often and it's appropriate. You'd have
to persuade others too. The meaning is completely clear to the people
who are climate deniers and I suspect, most others.

In message
,
Dawlish writes
On Nov 1, 1:30*pm, James Brown
wrote:
No you weren't. Like every climate denier you think this unusual
colder, local, temporary weather is important and an indicator that
the climate is getting colder. It isn't.

Forecast temperatures for NYC for the next 10 days are below - 12-15C
every day. The average for NYC at this time of year is about 12C.

You have plummeted into the weather is climate trap, larry. Climate
deniers like you just can't help themselves, because they are actually
silly enough to believe that local, temporary cold means something.
I'm afraid that it doesn't. *))

("get in there son")

http://uk.weather.com/weather/10day-New-York-USNY0996

Can I persuade you Paul to ditch the ridiculous and meaningless label of
'climate denier' in your posts - it really is inappropriate in a
scientific argument. Please substitute AGW denier if you must
pigeon-hole.

James
--
James Brown

sorry James, no. I don't use it often and it's appropriate. You'd have
to persuade others too. The meaning is completely clear to the people
who are climate deniers and I suspect, most others.

Then I give up with you - You could equally IMHO substitute 'people
deniers' for holocaust deniers, but the meaning would be equally lost.

All the best,

James

--
James Brown

On Nov 1, 5:01*pm, James Brown
wrote:
In message
,
Dawlish writes





On Nov 1, 1:30 pm, James Brown
wrote:
No you weren't. Like every climate denier you think this unusual
colder, local, temporary weather is important and an indicator that
the climate is getting colder. It isn't.

Forecast temperatures for NYC for the next 10 days are below - 12-15C
every day. The average for NYC at this time of year is about 12C.

You have plummeted into the weather is climate trap, larry. Climate
deniers like you just can't help themselves, because they are actually
silly enough to believe that local, temporary cold means something.
I'm afraid that it doesn't. *))

("get in there son")

http://uk.weather.com/weather/10day-New-York-USNY0996

Can I persuade you Paul to ditch the ridiculous and meaningless label of
'climate denier' in your posts - it really is inappropriate in a
scientific argument. Please substitute AGW denier if you must
pigeon-hole.

James
--
James Brown

sorry James, no. I don't use it often and it's appropriate. You'd have
to persuade others too. The meaning is completely clear to the people
who are climate deniers and I suspect, most others.

Then I give up with you - You could equally IMHO substitute 'people
deniers' for holocaust deniers, but the meaning would be equally lost.

All the best,

James

--
James Brown- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Is it OK if I do the same with you? (Dunno why you are so peeved, I
just replied to your request, but I'm happy to do the same) *))

All the best,

Paul

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 07:30:24 -0700, Dawlish wrote:


sorry James, no. I don't use it often and it's appropriate. You'd have
to persuade others too. The meaning is completely clear to the people
who are climate deniers and I suspect, most others.

Lawrence has never denied that there is a climate.
He has not even denied *climate change* that I have noticed (though you
don't mention that).

As I understand it, he has issues with puny humans being the cause of
pretty much anything aside of being a pain in the a*** to every other
species. A Gaia theorist perhaps (and yes, I know the author changed his
mind later).


--
Gianna
Peterhead, Scotland

buchan-meteo.org.uk