uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 8th 11, 04:58 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2010
Posts: 78
Default 110 kt mean Cairngorm summit

Bit blowy up there.

MartinR

  #2   Report Post  
Old December 8th 11, 07:50 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,488
Default 110 kt mean Cairngorm summit

MartinR wrote:
Bit blowy up there.

MartinR

---------------------
Is the 173 mph record in danger I wonder? Was that measurement a gust?
Dave
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 8th 11, 07:57 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,081
Default 110 kt mean Cairngorm summit

Dave Cornwell wrote:

MartinR wrote:
Bit blowy up there.

MartinR

---------------------
Is the 173 mph record in danger I wonder? Was that measurement a gust?
Dave


Of course, one can never be really sure because, as far as I know, the
instrumentation is only exposed for a few minutes every hour - at least that
was the case in the past. Unless there is continuous recording you can never
know what exactly is the maximum gust.

--
Norman Lynagh
Tideswell, Derbyshire
303m a.s.l.
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 8th 11, 08:06 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,081
Default 110 kt mean Cairngorm summit

Norman wrote:

Dave Cornwell wrote:

MartinR wrote:
Bit blowy up there.

MartinR

---------------------
Is the 173 mph record in danger I wonder? Was that measurement a gust?
Dave


Of course, one can never be really sure because, as far as I know, the
instrumentation is only exposed for a few minutes every hour - at least that
was the case in the past. Unless there is continuous recording you can never
know what exactly is the maximum gust.



Apologies (again) for replying to my own postings. I'm making a habit of this!

From the Cairngorm weather website:

-----------------------------------------------------
The instruments are exposed for 3 minutes every half hour, with the mean wind
speed being the 2.5 minute mean of readings made every 2.5 seconds. The max
gust and the min wind speed are the highest and lowest readings over the 2.5
minute period.
-----------------------------------------------------

The absolute maximum gusts are therefore not recorded and it is not possible to
say that a particular event produced "record" maximum gusts.

--
Norman Lynagh
Tideswell, Derbyshire
303m a.s.l.
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 9th 11, 04:06 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2011
Posts: 359
Default 110 kt mean Cairngorm summit

On Dec 8, 7:57*pm, "Norman" wrote:
Dave Cornwell wrote:
MartinR wrote:
Bit blowy up there.


MartinR

---------------------
Is the 173 mph record in danger I wonder? Was that measurement a gust?
Dave


Of course, one can never be really sure because, as far as I know, the
instrumentation is only exposed for a few minutes every hour - at least that
was the case in the past. Unless there is continuous recording you can never
know what exactly is the maximum gust.

--
Norman Lynagh
Tideswell, Derbyshire
303m a.s.l.


The Met Office SIESAWS on Cairn Gorm is a continuous recording system.
The Heriot-Watt AWS samples twice per hour (when it's working!)

Daniel.


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 9th 11, 05:45 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,081
Default 110 kt mean Cairngorm summit

Desperate Dan wrote:

On Dec 8, 7:57*pm, "Norman" wrote:
Dave Cornwell wrote:
MartinR wrote:
Bit blowy up there.


MartinR
---------------------
Is the 173 mph record in danger I wonder? Was that measurement a gust?
Dave


Of course, one can never be really sure because, as far as I know, the
instrumentation is only exposed for a few minutes every hour - at least that
was the case in the past. Unless there is continuous recording you can never
know what exactly is the maximum gust.

--
Norman Lynagh
Tideswell, Derbyshire
303m a.s.l.


The Met Office SIESAWS on Cairn Gorm is a continuous recording system.
The Heriot-Watt AWS samples twice per hour (when it's working!)

Daniel.


I stand corrected. I only knew of the Herriot Watt AWS.

--
Norman Lynagh
Tideswell, Derbyshire
303m a.s.l.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
114mph Cairngorm summit this evening Rob Brooks uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 January 17th 09 08:06 PM
Integrated or (Max+Min)/2 ??? and Help! When we say Mean do we mean Average - I always get confused? Roy Avis uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 February 2nd 08 12:56 PM
Integrated or (Max+Min)/2 - and when we say Mean do we mean Average [email protected] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 February 2nd 08 12:34 PM
CO2's warming is not uniform, just as predicted 110 years ago. Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 83 February 2nd 07 04:43 PM
Typhoon Maemi leaves 110 dead or missing in S.Korea Brendan DJ Murphy uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 September 14th 03 09:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017