Agreed and good to see the possibilities being expressed fairly
sensibly. Nice to see Will getting excited about something other than
cold weather too. *))

You just can't help yourself and resist having constant little digs &
jibes at Will's forecasts, yet the minute someone has a swipe at you,
you'll threaten to report them to the Google Police.

It's one of the reason's so many people have left this group, and why
I don't post on here very often anymore.

It's about time you grew up, manned up, and stopped acting like a
little child that is always right & never wrong.

I fully understand why Will has blocked you, and Philip Eden decided
to leave this group.

It would be a sad day if Will also decided not to post on here, but a
relief to many if you finally decided to wind your neck in, or better
still if you left this group for others to feel free to post without
your constant whining & jibes.

Rant over.

On Dec 10, 3:15*pm, Buchan Meteo wrote:
Adam Lea scrive:

I'm concerned I would be liable for any damage incurred if it did fail
completely. Unfortunately I don't think there is time to have the fence
replaced. I am considering doing what Lawrence suggests and try to add
extra support to it, or else remove the fence panels completely.

Your property insurance should include liability for damage to third
parties and so you would not be personally liable. Your neighbour's car
is no doubt also insured against damage. All in all, not a lot to worry
about.

--
Gianna
Peterhead, Scotland

buchan-meteo.org.uk

Although, fences would only normally be covered by property insurance
if the same event causes damage to the structure of the building
also..

Paul

Buchan Meteo wrote:
Adam Lea scrive:

I'm concerned I would be liable for any damage incurred if it did
fail completely. Unfortunately I don't think there is time to have
the fence replaced. I am considering doing what Lawrence suggests
and try to add extra support to it, or else remove the fence panels
completely.

Your property insurance should include liability for damage to third
parties and so you would not be personally liable. Your neighbour's
car is no doubt also insured against damage. All in all, not a lot to
worry about.

Adam might not be covered by his policy if damage is caused by a fence of
his which he knows to be in a dangerous condition and which he has not
repaired as soon as possible.

This is rather like putting up a "Beware of the Dog" sign which could be
construed as an admission that you know the beast is dangerous.

In the present case the neighbour has warned Adam of the risk to his car so
Adam cannot claim that he is not aware of the situation.

All that I am really saying, Gianna, is that you should not assume that
insurance companies will always pay out on claims which even reasonable
people might consider reasonable.

Roger

seasend scrive:


Although, fences would only normally be covered by property insurance if
the same event causes damage to the structure of the building also..

Paul

I was not really concerned about the fence being covered but rather the
car being covered if damaged by the fence falling upon it.

--
Gianna
Peterhead, Scotland

buchan-meteo.org.uk

On 10/12/11 15:39, Teignmouth wrote:
I fully understand why Will has blocked you, and Philip Eden decided
to leave this group.

I'm not sure Paul was to blame for PE leaving but I could be wrong. A
little while before he left, he got annoyed with the politics that was
being bandied about in place of scientific discussion.

Anyway, simple answer is to kill-file the twerps - or those you regard
as such - and sail serenely on.

I still think some people are looking back at the earlier days of this
newsgroup through rose-tinted spectacles. There were plenty of stupid
arguments in those days and some people left the group because of them.

--
Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks. E-mail: change boy to man
Teach evolution, not creationism: http://evolutionnotcreationism.org.uk/

On Dec 10, 3:58*pm, Buchan Meteo wrote:
seasend scrive:



Although, fences would only normally be covered by property insurance if
the same event causes damage to the structure of the building also..

Paul

I was not really concerned about the fence being covered but rather the
car being covered if damaged by the fence falling upon it.

--
Gianna
Peterhead, Scotland

buchan-meteo.org.uk

Yes I agree Gianna, the nieghbour could take offence

On 10/12/11 15:58, Buchan Meteo wrote:
seasend scrive:


Although, fences would only normally be covered by property insurance if
the same event causes damage to the structure of the building also..

Paul

I was not really concerned about the fence being covered but rather the
car being covered if damaged by the fence falling upon it.


Although wouldn't the car be covered only if the owner had fully
comprehensive insurance?

On Dec 10, 3:47*pm, seasend wrote:
On Dec 10, 3:15*pm, Buchan Meteo wrote:





Adam Lea scrive:

I'm concerned I would be liable for any damage incurred if it did fail
completely. Unfortunately I don't think there is time to have the fence
replaced. I am considering doing what Lawrence suggests and try to add
extra support to it, or else remove the fence panels completely.

Your property insurance should include liability for damage to third
parties and so you would not be personally liable. Your neighbour's car
is no doubt also insured against damage. All in all, not a lot to worry
about.

--
Gianna
Peterhead, Scotland

buchan-meteo.org.uk

Although, fences would only normally be covered by property insurance
if the same event causes damage to the structure of the building
also..

Paul- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes fences will be covered but premiums won't.

On Dec 10, 3:39*pm, Teignmouth wrote:
Agreed and good to see the possibilities being expressed fairly
sensibly. Nice to see Will getting excited about something other than
cold weather too. *))

You just can't help yourself and resist having constant little digs &
jibes at Will's forecasts, yet the minute someone has a swipe at you,
you'll threaten to report them to the Google Police.

It's one of the reason's so many people have left this group, and why
I don't post on here very often anymore.

It's about time you grew up, manned up, and stopped acting like a
little child that is always right & never wrong.

I fully understand why Will has blocked you, and Philip Eden decided
to leave this group.

It would be a sad day if Will also decided not to post on here, but a
relief to many if you finally decided to wind your neck in, or better
still if you left this group for others to feel free to post without
your constant whining & jibes.

Rant over.

?? Nice to have you back. *))

On Dec 10, 5:00*pm, Adam Lea wrote:
On 10/12/11 15:58, Buchan Meteo wrote:

seasend scrive:

Although, fences would only normally be covered by property insurance if
the same event causes damage to the structure of the building also..

Paul

I was not really concerned about the fence being covered but rather the
car being covered if damaged by the fence falling upon it.

Although wouldn't the car be covered only if the owner had fully
comprehensive insurance?

The car will be covered alright Adam, unfortunately it will be with
splinters not insurance. Remove the panels if it's not too much effort
and then all resistance will be futile.