"Lawrence13" wrote in message
...

Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm
going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
ding dongs.

Mr Garvey is patently quite bonkers and once I stop posting he will
find somebody else to fall out with as that seems to be his nature.



Paul Garvey has emailed threatening me with some sort of legal
action.

He claims I physically threatened him some time ago when basically he
was so arrogantly rude I offered him the opportunity to say it to me
man to man.

Okay a bit Macho and stupid but he really is to ready with insults and
general rudeness. I place this here as he is a madman and I want
everything open out in public, This is what he has just emailed me.





"I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
planned.

One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.

I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
"potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."


Paul you need to see a therapist of some sort .

Lawrence, it you stop posting on here, this NG will be the poorer for it
because it takes all types, the Lawrences, the Dawlishes and everyone else
to make a Newsgroup. The thing is, just don't let people get to you. It
they're rude, be big enough to ignore them. If you're in the right,
everyone will see you are and be on your side; if you're wrong, well, you
can't really grumble! We all get really hacked off with flame wars.

Ian Bingham,
Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire.

This is what he has just emailed me.

"I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
planned.

One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.

I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
"potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."

The way I see it is Dawlish's arrogance is his undoing and many people
on many newsgroups are totally fed up with him. However, it is (mostly)
a free world and I wouldn't want to see the internet globally censored.
That's what the killfile is for.

I'm fairly amazed that his address and phone number was so easy to find
on Google (sorry but I couldn't resist when I came across his real name
somewhere in this thread!) but I guess he's so brazen that he thinks
he's untouchable.

Many years ago, I was in to amateur radio. There used to be a repeater
up on the Crystal Palace mast in South London, that attracted all sorts
of dross from many miles around.

One day, a twit like Dawlish appeared and rubbed a lot of people up the
wrong way. So much so that some nutter took it upon themselves to petrol
bomb the twits car!!!!

Apparently, the flames went up the side of the house, in to the roof and
burnt the house down!

I wouldn't wish that upon anyone but there are nutters out there and I
think Dawlish really should pull his neck in before he upsets the wrong
person.

By the way Dawlish, is that your website about Trains I came across when
googling "Paul Garvey Dawlish"?

lawrence is to blame as well.
why the hell doesnt he just ignore that ****. but he keeps coming back
for more.
im mean its not rocket science.
kill file or not, just bloody well ignore the oaf.

dullish has been exposed fully now. i think most have made their minds
up now.

if lawrence has any sense, is that when he returns, and i know he will,
he vows to never to reply to him ever again.period.


On 29/02/2012 6:24 AM, Ian Bingham wrote:


"Tom2131" wrote in message
...

Increasingly, this Newsgroup has become unrecognisable from the one I
first remember discovering over 10 years ago, and we're all the poorer
for that.

Although I've struggled to resist it, I've become thoroughly fed-up
with the raw unpleasantness that some posts to this Group have
contained, of late. They're introverted, boring, narrow-minded,
disrespectful and nasty, and are bloody awful to have to wade through
but they are difficult to avoid as they often pop up in the most
unlikely places. What's worse, they don't add one iota to the sum of
knowledge, nor are they in the spirit of sensible discussion which I
always thought this Group was set-up to promote.

To those who take delight in all this: Go and fight your petty spats
somewhere else. I've neither the time or patience to listen to them
any longer.

- Tom.

Amen to all of that.

Ian Bingham,
Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire.

Tudor Hughes wrote in
:

Me too, having had a drink with Lawrence last night. Not a
monster. Rather good company.

You too can find love on uk.sci.weather (ducks objects flying from Sydenham
and Surrey).

Richard

On 29/02/12 21:36, Neil wrote:

The way I see it is Dawlish's arrogance is his undoing and many people
on many newsgroups are totally fed up with him. However, it is (mostly)
a free world and I wouldn't want to see the internet globally censored.
That's what the killfile is for.

I'm fairly amazed that his address and phone number was so easy to find
on Google (sorry but I couldn't resist when I came across his real name
somewhere in this thread!) but I guess he's so brazen that he thinks
he's untouchable.

Many years ago, I was in to amateur radio. There used to be a repeater
up on the Crystal Palace mast in South London, that attracted all sorts
of dross from many miles around.

One day, a twit like Dawlish appeared and rubbed a lot of people up the
wrong way. So much so that some nutter took it upon themselves to petrol
bomb the twits car!!!!

Apparently, the flames went up the side of the house, in to the roof and
burnt the house down!

I wouldn't wish that upon anyone but there are nutters out there and I
think Dawlish really should pull his neck in before he upsets the wrong
person.

By the way Dawlish, is that your website about Trains I came across when
googling "Paul Garvey Dawlish"?

The way I see it Lawrence is as much to blame for this. The stuff he
comes out with regarding AGW is like he is deliberately trying to
provoke Dawlish. Not to mention the nasty ad-hominen political attacks
he has made about climate scientists in the past, or the hypocrisy of
accusing people of "alarmism" then making equally alarmist statements
about the economic consequences of taking action. Yet all this seems to
be fair game because he has a good sense of humour at other times. I'm
tempted to say it is an example of style trumps substance.

BTW I do think Dawlish has gone way OTT and I do not approve of the way
he communicates with others on here. I wonder if this is because he
simply lacks social skills.

"Adam Lea" wrote in message
...

The way I see it Lawrence is as much to blame for this. The stuff he comes
out with regarding AGW is like he is deliberately trying to provoke
Dawlish. Not to mention the nasty ad-hominen political attacks he has made
about climate scientists in the past, or the hypocrisy of accusing people
of "alarmism" then making equally alarmist statements about the economic
consequences of taking action. Yet all this seems to be fair game because
he has a good sense of humour at other times. I'm tempted to say it is an
example of style trumps substance.

There have been many times when I've considered them as bad
as each other but at least Lawerence has the decency to accept
a portion of the blame, some awareness regarding his actions.
Can you imagine Dawlish even admitting that he might have got
a little carried away on occaision?
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

On 29/02/12 22:02, Global Cooling Charlie wrote:
lawrence is to blame as well.
why the hell doesnt he just ignore that ****. but he keeps coming back
for more.
im mean its not rocket science.
kill file or not, just bloody well ignore the oaf.

Talking of ****s and oafs, Terry, why don't you stop hiding behind all
these pseudonyms? The only reason I can think of is that you enjoy
inflicting your ****tishness and oafishness on as many people as possible.


--
Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks. E-mail: change boy to man
LibreOffice: http://www.documentfoundation.org/
openSUSE Linux: http://www.opensuse.org/en/

On 01/03/12 07:22, Col wrote:
"Adam wrote in message
...

The way I see it Lawrence is as much to blame for this. The stuff he comes
out with regarding AGW is like he is deliberately trying to provoke
Dawlish. Not to mention the nasty ad-hominen political attacks he has made
about climate scientists in the past, or the hypocrisy of accusing people
of "alarmism" then making equally alarmist statements about the economic
consequences of taking action. Yet all this seems to be fair game because
he has a good sense of humour at other times. I'm tempted to say it is an
example of style trumps substance.

There have been many times when I've considered them as bad
as each other but at least Lawerence has the decency to accept
a portion of the blame, some awareness regarding his actions.
Can you imagine Dawlish even admitting that he might have got
a little carried away on occaision?

True. I have noticed Lawrence does sincerely apologise on occasion when
he goes too far and for that I do have some respect for him.

On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:24:06 +0000, Adam Lea wrote:


True. I have noticed Lawrence does sincerely apologise on occasion when
he goes too far and for that I do have some respect for him.

Yes; manners maketh man. When Lawrence has a bout of hot-headed cooling
he sometimes accepts that he is "partly responsible".

What a gent! I'll bet he puts his hazards on if he parks in an
inconsiderate way too.

OMG, just realised why it's been some time since I last visited this site.
Two sides to every story of course, but I do hope you don't take time out Lawrence, have often, (not always) enjoyed your posts and the ng would be lacking without your contribution.
Do try and get on guys, it's really not that difficult.

David Mitchell. Langtoft, East Riding.