This action could begin their terminal decline as scientifically
credible institutions....


Piers Corbyn, astrophysicist of WeatherAction says:
The pathetically opportunist public 'revelations' by the BBC-MO of the
importance of (polar sudden) stratospheric warmings in the advent of
cold blasts after WeatherAction's prediction (Jan 3) of such events to
come; and their failure to acknowledge WeatherAction and associates of
their work, shows they will stop at nothing to try and shore up their
failed approaches.
Peter Gibbs video on the matter http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/feeds/20992173
is well explained and informative but the intro "Forecasters have
found a link between sudden warming in the stratosphere and unusual
weather patterns" conceals their own (effectively admitted in the vid)
failure to know which SSWs will cause cold blasts or when SSWs will
come or where they come from shows 'the forecasters' could not have
originally been the Met Office. The piece and (less so) Paul Hudson's
earlier piece http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulhudso...ecasting.shtml
in the matter was produced to make it look as if the MO might have a
grip of the matters when they ONLY started talking about them after we
at WeatherAction stated the cold blast to come (which they didnt
expect anyway) would be 'SSW creatures'. Their opportunusm will
however bite them back.
Ask from where do SSWs come?
The scientific cretinism that holds a change of atmosperic CO2
concentration from ~0.03% to ~0.031% (the 0.01% being Man's
contribution) could cause Hurricane Sandy to take a left turn and head
for New York and trigger all manner of other extremes in 2011 and 2012
(many of which were in fact predicted using solar activity) is
delusional enough. The idea that SSWs at 10-50km above the Earth are
also driven by CO2 (which they MUST be if CO2 is the father of all
these extremes) is beneath cretinist. And what of the Earth-facing
extreme events on the sun when major SSWs happen? Are they put there
by Peter Gibbs driving his car past some tipping point?

SSWs are driven by solar activity and we at WeatherAction are
predicting the major ones, and their solar drivers, which cause NH
winter important cold blasts; whereas standard Met has no such long
range predictive skill on SSWs or anything. This shows two things:
(i) The fundamental tenet of standard meteorology that weather
primarily drives weather and all external influences are minimal -
which means SSWs are driven from below - is past its sell-by date.
(ii) They are nothing to do with CO2.
WOULD THE BBC-METO CARE TO DISCUSS THESE MATTERS WITH US ON TV WHEN
MUCH OF BRITAIN IS SUFFERING UNDER EXTREME COLD BLASTS AND HUGE
SNOWDRIFTS?

On Monday, January 14, 2013 2:30:06 AM UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:
This action could begin their terminal decline as scientifically

credible institutions....





Piers Corbyn, astrophysicist of WeatherAction says:

The pathetically opportunist public 'revelations' by the BBC-MO of the

importance of (polar sudden) stratospheric warmings in the advent of

cold blasts after WeatherAction's prediction (Jan 3) of such events to

come; and their failure to acknowledge WeatherAction and associates of

their work, shows they will stop at nothing to try and shore up their

failed approaches.

Peter Gibbs video on the matter http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/feeds/20992173

is well explained and informative but the intro "Forecasters have

found a link between sudden warming in the stratosphere and unusual

weather patterns" conceals their own (effectively admitted in the vid)

failure to know which SSWs will cause cold blasts or when SSWs will

come or where they come from shows 'the forecasters' could not have

originally been the Met Office. The piece and (less so) Paul Hudson's

earlier piece http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulhudso...ecasting.shtml

in the matter was produced to make it look as if the MO might have a

grip of the matters when they ONLY started talking about them after we

at WeatherAction stated the cold blast to come (which they didnt

expect anyway) would be 'SSW creatures'. Their opportunusm will

however bite them back.

Ask from where do SSWs come?

The scientific cretinism that holds a change of atmosperic CO2

concentration from ~0.03% to ~0.031% (the 0.01% being Man's

contribution) could cause Hurricane Sandy to take a left turn and head

for New York and trigger all manner of other extremes in 2011 and 2012

(many of which were in fact predicted using solar activity) is

delusional enough. The idea that SSWs at 10-50km above the Earth are

also driven by CO2 (which they MUST be if CO2 is the father of all

these extremes) is beneath cretinist. And what of the Earth-facing

extreme events on the sun when major SSWs happen? Are they put there

by Peter Gibbs driving his car past some tipping point?



SSWs are driven by solar activity and we at WeatherAction are

predicting the major ones, and their solar drivers, which cause NH

winter important cold blasts; whereas standard Met has no such long

range predictive skill on SSWs or anything. This shows two things:

(i) The fundamental tenet of standard meteorology that weather

primarily drives weather and all external influences are minimal -

which means SSWs are driven from below - is past its sell-by date.

(ii) They are nothing to do with CO2.

WOULD THE BBC-METO CARE TO DISCUSS THESE MATTERS WITH US ON TV WHEN

MUCH OF BRITAIN IS SUFFERING UNDER EXTREME COLD BLASTS AND HUGE

SNOWDRIFTS?

You really are certifiable but at least you make me laugh! Could your head be any further in the noose?! Lol!