Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It really gets you that I wish to remain anonymous on here! Why would I want to reveal my identity to someone that clearly only has bad intentions towards me & would use it to possibly stalk me, after all I only live 3 miles away, & I've seen how you cyber stalk & hound Will.
I've revealed my identity in the past to Will & Philip Eden, but friendship has to be earned first, & I'm afraid you are someone that could never be trusted & I have no desire ever to meet. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, 14 April 2013 15:34:47 UTC+1, Kate Brown wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013, Lawrence13 wrote On Saturday, 13 April 2013 22:37:09 UTC+1, Kate Brown wrote: snip dozens of empty and half-empty lines badly configured by Google Groups Lawrence, you need to untick that box in Google Groups that also sends this as email.... ![]() -- Kate B PS nospam means nospam. But umra at cockaigne dot org dot uk will get through! No problem Kate but ever since I moved for OE to google groups I haven't touched any settings and just presumed things were okay. Where is that setting? I don't know, because I never use the blighter. But I do know that it never snips (thus producing huge long strings of irrelevancies), mangles posts (as it's mangled the one you sent), and unless you keep an eye on it (because it alters settings without your permission), starts sending copies of posts as emails to the poster you're replying to. Which all means that any sensible matter in the post gets submerged under miscellaneous crap.... ![]() That'll be a good thing with my posts! |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:11:15 PM UTC+1, Teignmouth wrote:
It really gets you that I wish to remain anonymous on here! Why would I want to reveal my identity to someone that clearly only has bad intentions towards me & would use it to possibly stalk me, after all I only live 3 miles away, & I've seen how you cyber stalk & hound Will. I've revealed my identity in the past to Will & Philip Eden, but friendship has to be earned first, & I'm afraid you are someone that could never be trusted & I have no desire ever to meet. Heh, sure. That would really happen. The feelings are entirely mutual, I can assure you. But that was only a sidestep to avoid the questions in my post, wasn't it? I'll re-post so you can't say you missed them. "And who was expecting "fine, warm & settled Spring weather"? Name sonmeone.. There's a bit of a strawman, don't you think? Will deliberately constructed it and you've fallen for it. I know all about what has happened to the jet and I know all about what Will was talking about - i.e it staying well south of the UK. What has happened to it was exactly what the models were predicting; hence my forecast. It was also what Will was not **wanting** and there's the nub. It is certainly not "way too far south" - which is the implied prediction from our dear Haytor resident and the meaning there was; "way too far south of the UK". BTW; no-one, AFAIK has mentioned that the Jet was going to be to the North of the UK for a prolonged period. You've made that up, haven't you and shouted a bit to try to be heard better. Well done. Not my fault that Will never returns to these hopecasts (and this one certainly was - a hope for continued cold which hasn't been realised) and leaves it to other sycophants to interpret them in hindsight, dear boy. Don't be taken in, would be my advice. Hope that helps to explain it, in terms that don't involve shouting, oh anonymous one." *)) |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 6:43:40 PM UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article , says... Heh! ffs Alan (your phrase). I love the way your prejudice about me and sycophancy to Will gets in the way of your thinking every time - and the only time you post is to have a pop at me. Will *always* looks on the cold side and he's come hopelessly unstuck here. The fact that you can't see that says an awful lot about you. *)) -sigh- Yes, your irritating pomposity and self promotion does irk me somewhat and I dare say it may occasionally influence me. I've lost count of the number of times I've started a post then not sent it, aware that it would just be another bit of bile to float amongst the crap that seems to flood this group in recent times. I /do/ try not to add to it too much. I wish you would do the same. I have failed on this occasion because of the magnitude of the pkb error when you spoke of Will's bitterness and, now, my prejudices. You are so guilty on both counts. I have no sycophancy towards Will, and, like others, find his fanaticism about cold and snow to grow somewhat wearisome over the course of a season. I do pay attention when he explains the theory and mechanism behind things as such posts are full of wheat with little chaff. You, on the other hand, must have wet dreams or something with regards to the man. Your constant sniping, baiting and constant futile attempts to discredit him whilst promoting yourself bear all the hallmarks of obsessiveness. I shall now attempt to remain in lurk mode again. I'm sure few others are the slightest bit interested in my bitter prejudiced missives against you nor yours against Will. -- Alan LeHun Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters. You would be very surprised who would be interested and indeed; who is. There are many other people whose silliness and idiocy who deserve to be outed.. Will is just one of many, Mr. Hun. *)) |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:48:50 -0700, Dawlish wrote:
You would be very surprised who would be interested and indeed; who is. There are many other people whose silliness and idiocy who deserve to be outed. Will is just one of many, Mr. Hun. *)) So! Mr Garvey, we meet again... |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, 14 April 2013 22:56:30 UTC+1, Ernst Stavro Blofeld wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:48:50 -0700, Dawlish wrote: You would be very surprised who would be interested and indeed; who is. There are many other people whose silliness and idiocy who deserve to be outed. Will is just one of many, Mr. Hun. *)) So! Mr Garvey, we meet again... Paul Gravy License to bore. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Overnight Min Temps Predicted Too High | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Sunshine in Brussels but a lot of high cloud too | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The Royal Society: too little, too late | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Solent reading too high ? 17.5°C today | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Expectations for the 2nd half of January | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |