In article ,
says...

And who was expecting "fine, warm & settled Spring weather"? Name sonmeone.


ffs paul, look back at the very first post in this thread. The one you
jumped on as part of your obsessive stalking of the man who likes to
point out the 20% of your forecasts/verbatim model descriptions long
before they actually go wrong. The irony in your complaining of Will's
bitterness is almost tangible.


Will made a simple post explaining that things weren't going to be as
good as some forecasters were maybe portraying. Your bitterness got the
better of you again, and you made far more of it than was there.


Milder air has finally arrived here in Aberdeen today. Up to 13.6C
today, after over a month of below average temps. Lots of sunshine too.



--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

In article ,
says...
Just got back from a week in Rome (18C, sunshine every day; a beautiful Roman spring and what a fantastic city)


Did you go along the Appian way on your travels? It's on my bucket list.

--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

On Sunday, April 14, 2013 4:21:02 PM UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,

says...



And who was expecting "fine, warm & settled Spring weather"? Name sonmeone.





ffs paul, look back at the very first post in this thread. The one you

jumped on as part of your obsessive stalking of the man who likes to

point out the 20% of your forecasts/verbatim model descriptions long

before they actually go wrong. The irony in your complaining of Will's

bitterness is almost tangible.





Will made a simple post explaining that things weren't going to be as

good as some forecasters were maybe portraying. Your bitterness got the

better of you again, and you made far more of it than was there.





Milder air has finally arrived here in Aberdeen today. Up to 13.6C

today, after over a month of below average temps. Lots of sunshine too.







--

Alan LeHun

Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

Heh! ffs Alan (your phrase). I love the way your prejudice about me and sycophancy to Will gets in the way of your thinking every time - and the only time you post is to have a pop at me. Will *always* looks on the cold side and he's come hopelessly unstuck here. The fact that you can't see that says an awful lot about you. *))

It really gets you that I wish to remain anonymous on here! Why would I want to reveal my identity to someone that clearly only has bad intentions towards me & would use it to possibly stalk me, after all I only live 3 miles away, & I've seen how you cyber stalk & hound Will.

I've revealed my identity in the past to Will & Philip Eden, but friendship has to be earned first, & I'm afraid you are someone that could never be trusted & I have no desire ever to meet.

In article ,
says...
Heh! ffs Alan (your phrase). I love the way your prejudice about me and sycophancy to Will gets in the way of your thinking every time - and the only time you post is to have a pop at me. Will *always* looks on the cold side and he's come hopelessly unstuck here. The fact that you can't see that says an awful lot about you. *))



-sigh-

Yes, your irritating pomposity and self promotion does irk me somewhat
and I dare say it may occasionally influence me. I've lost count of the
number of times I've started a post then not sent it, aware that it
would just be another bit of bile to float amongst the crap that seems
to flood this group in recent times. I /do/ try not to add to it too
much. I wish you would do the same. I have failed on this occasion
because of the magnitude of the pkb error when you spoke of Will's
bitterness and, now, my prejudices. You are so guilty on both counts.

I have no sycophancy towards Will, and, like others, find his fanaticism
about cold and snow to grow somewhat wearisome over the course of a
season. I do pay attention when he explains the theory and mechanism
behind things as such posts are full of wheat with little chaff. You, on
the other hand, must have wet dreams or something with regards to the
man. Your constant sniping, baiting and constant futile attempts to
discredit him whilst promoting yourself bear all the hallmarks of
obsessiveness.

I shall now attempt to remain in lurk mode again. I'm sure few others
are the slightest bit interested in my bitter prejudiced missives
against you nor yours against Will.

--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

On Sunday, 14 April 2013 15:34:47 UTC+1, Kate Brown wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013, Lawrence13 wrote

On Saturday, 13 April 2013 22:37:09 UTC+1, Kate Brown wrote:



snip dozens of empty and half-empty lines badly configured by Google

Groups



Lawrence, you need to untick that box in Google Groups that also sends



this as email....







--



Kate B







PS nospam means nospam. But umra at cockaigne dot org dot uk will get

through!



No problem Kate but ever since I moved for OE to google groups I

haven't touched any settings and just presumed things were okay. Where

is that setting?



I don't know, because I never use the blighter. But I do know that it

never snips (thus producing huge long strings of irrelevancies), mangles

posts (as it's mangled the one you sent), and unless you keep an eye on

it (because it alters settings without your permission), starts sending

copies of posts as emails to the poster you're replying to.



Which all means that any sensible matter in the post gets submerged

under miscellaneous crap....




That'll be a good thing with my posts!

On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:11:15 PM UTC+1, Teignmouth wrote:
It really gets you that I wish to remain anonymous on here! Why would I want to reveal my identity to someone that clearly only has bad intentions towards me & would use it to possibly stalk me, after all I only live 3 miles away, & I've seen how you cyber stalk & hound Will.



I've revealed my identity in the past to Will & Philip Eden, but friendship has to be earned first, & I'm afraid you are someone that could never be trusted & I have no desire ever to meet.

Heh, sure. That would really happen. The feelings are entirely mutual, I can assure you.

But that was only a sidestep to avoid the questions in my post, wasn't it? I'll re-post so you can't say you missed them.

"And who was expecting "fine, warm & settled Spring weather"? Name sonmeone..

There's a bit of a strawman, don't you think? Will deliberately constructed it and you've fallen for it. I know all about what has happened to the jet and I know all about what Will was talking about - i.e it staying well south of the UK. What has happened to it was exactly what the models were predicting; hence my forecast. It was also what Will was not **wanting** and there's the nub. It is certainly not "way too far south" - which is the implied prediction from our dear Haytor resident and the meaning there was; "way too far south of the UK". BTW; no-one, AFAIK has mentioned that the Jet was going to be to the North of the UK for a prolonged period. You've made that up, haven't you and shouted a bit to try to be heard better. Well done.

Not my fault that Will never returns to these hopecasts (and this one certainly was - a hope for continued cold which hasn't been realised) and leaves it to other sycophants to interpret them in hindsight, dear boy. Don't be taken in, would be my advice.

Hope that helps to explain it, in terms that don't involve shouting, oh anonymous one."

*))

On Sunday, April 14, 2013 6:43:40 PM UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,

says...

Heh! ffs Alan (your phrase). I love the way your prejudice about me and sycophancy to Will gets in the way of your thinking every time - and the only time you post is to have a pop at me. Will *always* looks on the cold side and he's come hopelessly unstuck here. The fact that you can't see that says an awful lot about you. *))







-sigh-



Yes, your irritating pomposity and self promotion does irk me somewhat

and I dare say it may occasionally influence me. I've lost count of the

number of times I've started a post then not sent it, aware that it

would just be another bit of bile to float amongst the crap that seems

to flood this group in recent times. I /do/ try not to add to it too

much. I wish you would do the same. I have failed on this occasion

because of the magnitude of the pkb error when you spoke of Will's

bitterness and, now, my prejudices. You are so guilty on both counts.



I have no sycophancy towards Will, and, like others, find his fanaticism

about cold and snow to grow somewhat wearisome over the course of a

season. I do pay attention when he explains the theory and mechanism

behind things as such posts are full of wheat with little chaff. You, on

the other hand, must have wet dreams or something with regards to the

man. Your constant sniping, baiting and constant futile attempts to

discredit him whilst promoting yourself bear all the hallmarks of

obsessiveness.



I shall now attempt to remain in lurk mode again. I'm sure few others

are the slightest bit interested in my bitter prejudiced missives

against you nor yours against Will.



--

Alan LeHun

Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

You would be very surprised who would be interested and indeed; who is. There are many other people whose silliness and idiocy who deserve to be outed.. Will is just one of many, Mr. Hun. *))

On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:48:50 -0700, Dawlish wrote:



You would be very surprised who would be interested and indeed; who is.
There are many other people whose silliness and idiocy who deserve to be
outed. Will is just one of many, Mr. Hun. *))

So! Mr Garvey, we meet again...

On Sunday, 14 April 2013 22:56:30 UTC+1, Ernst Stavro Blofeld wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:48:50 -0700, Dawlish wrote:







You would be very surprised who would be interested and indeed; who is.

There are many other people whose silliness and idiocy who deserve to be

outed. Will is just one of many, Mr. Hun. *))



So! Mr Garvey, we meet again...


Paul Gravy License to bore.