 |
|
| uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
May 16th 13, 11:49 AM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
Massive Butterfly Losses.
On 2013-05-15 23:31:56 +0000, Tudor Hughes said:
On May 15, 8:42*pm, Richard Dixon wrote: On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 18:18:25 UTC+1, Dave Cornwell *wrote: Following last year's wet summer Scientists are saying that they are at their lowest numbers since humans inhabited the planet. With fewer butterflies flapping their wings I guess the numerical models will have better forecasts with less chaos about... Richard mode="Black Country" I like it; it's a good one is that./mode I'm sorry, I don't know enough about butterflies to be serious about this. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Does one need to know a lot about a subject in order to take it seriously? |
|
#2
May 16th 13, 04:21 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Massive Butterfly Losses.
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:49:47 PM UTC+1, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-05-15 23:31:56 +0000, Tudor Hughes said: On May 15, 8:42�pm, Richard Dixon wrote: On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 18:18:25 UTC+1, Dave Cornwell �wrote: Following last year's wet summer Scientists are saying that they are at their lowest numbers since humans inhabited the planet. With fewer butterflies flapping their wings I guess the numerical models will have better forecasts with less chaos about... Richard mode="Black Country" I like it; it's a good one is that./mode I'm sorry, I don't know enough about butterflies to be serious about this. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Does one need to know a lot about a subject in order to take it seriously? Seen plenty of orange tips, some large and small whites, red admirals, speckled woods and a peacock, but nothing else yet. I'd agree with the consensus that the winter has made inroads into the butterfly population. Given a decent summer, allowing several broods to hatch and they'll hopefully recover. Big crossed fingers on that one, as recording butterflies is an interest. |
|
#3
May 16th 13, 04:43 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Massive Butterfly Losses.
On May 16, 12:49*pm, yttiw wrote:
On 2013-05-15 23:31:56 +0000, Tudor Hughes said: On May 15, 8:42 pm, Richard Dixon wrote: On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 18:18:25 UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote: Following last year's wet summer Scientists are saying that they are at their lowest numbers since humans inhabited the planet. With fewer butterflies flapping their wings I guess the numerical models will have better forecasts with less chaos about... Richard mode="Black Country" I like it; it's a good one is that./mode I'm sorry, I don't know enough about butterflies to be serious about this. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Does one need to know a lot about a subject in order to take it seriously?- It will be a lot less in some parts of the country with this new threart to trees. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Walruses Suffer Substantial Losses as Sea Ice Erodes | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| Bandwagon losses a wheel! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
| Insurer lowers hurricane estimate -- $7.4bn (£4bn;5.9bn euros). Uninsured losses, not included. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Hybrid Mode
