Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 10:12:19 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
All models point this way. **over the August Bank holiday, the weather will be very warm and dry over much of the UK** Perfick! Back on track. The ECM does not want to play ball on this one, though other models show a fine and warm Bank holiday. The MetO tends not to favour the ECM, but still hints at a possible unsettled spanner in the works: "UK Outlook for Tuesday 20 Aug 2013 to Thursday 29 Aug 2013: Many parts will enjoy some sunny spells through Tuesday and Wednesday, the best of which will be across southern and eastern areas where it should turn warm at times. There will, however, be some showers, mainly in the north and west with the risk of more persistent rain and stronger winds for a time. From Thursday until Saturday, most parts will continue to see fine, dry and sunny weather with warm temperatures in places. Parts of the west and northwest may be more unsettled with rain at times, and there is also a low risk of these conditions spreading as far south as the Midlands. Thereafter, dry, warm and sunny weather may continue in the south and east, although more unsettled weather is likely to affect the north and west. Updated: 1145 on Thu 15 Aug 2013" |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:31:31 -0700, Dawlish wrote:
- On Thursday, August 15, 2013 10:27:47 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: / On Thursday, 15 August 2013 20:29:01 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: / / - On Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:41:58 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: / / / - / - - On Thursday, 15 August 2013 18:38:38 UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote: / / / - / / - - / / - / - - - Col wrote: / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - - Adam Lea wrote: / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - / On 15/08/13 05:20, Col wrote: / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - /- Tudor Hughes wrote: / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - // On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:19:33 UTC+1, Lawrence13 / - - - // wrote: / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - // / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - //- On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:12:19 UTC+1, Dawlish / - - - //- wrote:- All / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - //- models point this way.- - - - **over the August Bank / - - - //- holiday, / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - //- the weather will be very warm and dry over much of the / - - - //- UK**- - - / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - /// Perfick! / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - // What's a 'dryover ' and are you planning to protest about / - - - // it, / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - // being a squirrel hibernating tree hugger and all that. By / - - - // the way / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - // that south Devon pronunciation 'perfick' as I've said before / - - - // once / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - // the e and f are removed , sums you up perfectly. That must / - - - // have / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - // known you were coming. / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - // / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - // Nice one, if a little contrived, but worth it. / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - // / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - /- It's good to see some subtle& sophisticated humour on here / - - - /- for once / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - /- instead of the usual abuse. / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - / Except that was the usual abuse. I don't see why there was any / - - - / need / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - / for that reply to a post that merely contained an outlook, / - - - / especially / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - / to someone who is known to flare up at any provocation. / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - - / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - - You clearly missed my sarcasm ![]() / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - --------------------------------- / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - I didn't Col and Adam is right. It has been pretty good on here / - - - lately - / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - - why stir up trouble? / / / - / / - - / / - / / - - / / - / / - - / / - / - - I think you'll find Dullish is at it all the time only recently he / - - called Jim Cannon an Idiot and the was very sarcastic and rude to / - - Bruce yet somehow some stayed strangely silent. / / / - / / - / / - / - Jim Cannon is an idiot. Don't have a go at me for telling the truth. / / / - / / - / / - / - And don't lie about what I said in reply to Bruce. I don't like / - liars. / / / / / / / / Well I try not to lie but in your case what are you going to do about / it. Get your solicitor involved and the police like you claim to have / done last time . / / / / Your alter boy ego 'Denise' with the wings of a Dove, as well as / yourself seem rather liberal with the term 'idiot', yet squeal like a / little 'deliverance' piggy when at the end of any. / / / / How about I call you a tosser and a very yellow tosser at that. Also / how about I meet you and you can bring Denise if you want LOL. / / / / I'll say no more to you for at least a fortnight. - - You're drunk again, aren't you larry............. Looks that way to me. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/08/13 09:39, Col wrote:
Adam Lea wrote: On 15/08/13 05:20, Col wrote: Tudor Hughes wrote: On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:19:33 UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:12:19 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: All models point this way. **over the August Bank holiday, the weather will be very warm and dry over much of the UK** Perfick! What's a 'dryover ' and are you planning to protest about it, being a squirrel hibernating tree hugger and all that. By the way that south Devon pronunciation 'perfick' as I've said before once the e and f are removed , sums you up perfectly. That must have known you were coming. Nice one, if a little contrived, but worth it. It's good to see some subtle& sophisticated humour on here for once instead of the usual abuse. Except that was the usual abuse. I don't see why there was any need for that reply to a post that merely contained an outlook, especially to someone who is known to flare up at any provocation. You clearly missed my sarcasm ![]() If that was sarcasm then it went right over my head, sorry. ![]() |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/08/2013 22:36, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Thursday, 15 August 2013 22:31:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: On Thursday, August 15, 2013 10:27:47 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Thursday, 15 August 2013 20:29:01 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: On Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:41:58 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Thursday, 15 August 2013 18:38:38 UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote: Col wrote: Adam Lea wrote: On 15/08/13 05:20, Col wrote: Tudor Hughes wrote: On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:19:33 UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:12:19 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: All models point this way. **over the August Bank holiday, the weather will be very warm and dry over much of the UK** Perfick! What's a 'dryover ' and are you planning to protest about it, being a squirrel hibernating tree hugger and all that. By the way that south Devon pronunciation 'perfick' as I've said before once the e and f are removed , sums you up perfectly. That must have known you were coming. Nice one, if a little contrived, but worth it. It's good to see some subtle& sophisticated humour on here for once instead of the usual abuse. Except that was the usual abuse. I don't see why there was any need for that reply to a post that merely contained an outlook, especially to someone who is known to flare up at any provocation. You clearly missed my sarcasm ![]() --------------------------------- I didn't Col and Adam is right. It has been pretty good on here lately - why stir up trouble? I think you'll find Dullish is at it all the time only recently he called Jim Cannon an Idiot and the was very sarcastic and rude to Bruce yet somehow some stayed strangely silent. Jim Cannon is an idiot. Don't have a go at me for telling the truth. And don't lie about what I said in reply to Bruce. I don't like liars. Well I try not to lie but in your case what are you going to do about it. Get your solicitor involved and the police like you claim to have done last time . Your alter boy ego 'Denise' with the wings of a Dove, as well as yourself seem rather liberal with the term 'idiot', yet squeal like a little 'deliverance' piggy when at the end of any. How about I call you a tosser and a very yellow tosser at that. Also how about I meet you and you can bring Denise if you want LOL. I'll say no more to you for at least a fortnight. You're drunk again, aren't you larry............. You know I'm of a mind to report you to Ofsted and show with your own words them what a nasty, arrogant, intolerant piece of work you are. Those all the qualities that are needed in a school inspector. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting. Bloody tellys packed up again. Am going to get valve wireless going. Much less distraction
|
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 16 August 2013 02:33:05 UTC+1, Jim Cannon wrote:
Interesting. Bloody tellys packed up again. Am going to get valve wireless going. Much less distraction Pop down to Lynne's Radio tell Mark I sent you and he'll do you a good deal. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... Col wrote: You clearly missed my sarcasm ![]() --------------------------------- I didn't Col and Adam is right. It has been pretty good on here lately - why stir up trouble? This thread is full of the same old abuse from the usual suspects, yet you criticise me for merely making a light-hearted sarcastic comment related to it. Why don't you take a pop at Lawrence for calling Dawlish a 'prick' which is what started this nonsense off in the first place? -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, August 16, 2013 5:51:17 AM UTC+1, Col wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message ... Col wrote: You clearly missed my sarcasm ![]() --------------------------------- I didn't Col and Adam is right. It has been pretty good on here lately - why stir up trouble? This thread is full of the same old abuse from the usual suspects, yet you criticise me for merely making a light-hearted sarcastic comment related to it. Why don't you take a pop at Lawrence for calling Dawlish a 'prick' which is what started this nonsense off in the first place? -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg "My enemy's enemy is my friend". A maxim of a few on here. They are still exhibiting the behaviour they displayed in the playground Col, but unlike the playground, where they could hide in the crowd and throw extra taunts at some poor kid, here the "victim" bites back and they don't like that at all.. *)) |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:17:47 +0100, Joe Egginton wrote:
- On 15/08/2013 22:36, Lawrence13 wrote: / On Thursday, 15 August 2013 22:31:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: /- On Thursday, August 15, 2013 10:27:47 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: /- // On Thursday, 15 August 2013 20:29:01 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote: /- /- // //- On Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:41:58 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: /- /- // /- //- /- // /// On Thursday, 15 August 2013 18:38:38 UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote: /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ///- Col wrote: /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // //// Adam Lea wrote: /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ////- On 15/08/13 05:20, Col wrote: /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ///// Tudor Hughes wrote: /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /////- On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:19:33 UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote: /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- /////- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ////// On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 22:12:19 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:- ////// All /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ////// models point this way.- - - - **over the August Bank ////// holiday, /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ////// the weather will be very warm and dry over much of the UK**- ////// - - /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // //////- Perfick! /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /////- What's a 'dryover ' and are you planning to protest about /////- it, /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /////- being a squirrel hibernating tree hugger and all that. By the /////- way /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /////- that south Devon pronunciation 'perfick' as I've said before /////- once /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /////- the e and f are removed , sums you up perfectly. That must /////- have /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /////- known you were coming. /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- /////- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /////- Nice one, if a little contrived, but worth it. /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- /////- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ///// It's good to see some subtle& sophisticated humour on here for ///// once /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ///// instead of the usual abuse. /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ////- Except that was the usual abuse. I don't see why there was any ////- need /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ////- for that reply to a post that merely contained an outlook, ////- especially /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ////- to someone who is known to flare up at any provocation. /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- //// /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // //// You clearly missed my sarcasm ![]() /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ///- --------------------------------- /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ///- I didn't Col and Adam is right. It has been pretty good on here ///- lately - /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- ///- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // ///- why stir up trouble? /- /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /- /// /- // /- //- /- // /// I think you'll find Dullish is at it all the time only recently he /// called Jim Cannon an Idiot and the was very sarcastic and rude to /// Bruce yet somehow some stayed strangely silent. /- /- // /- //- /- // /- //- /- // /- //- /- // //- Jim Cannon is an idiot. Don't have a go at me for telling the truth. /- /- // /- //- /- // /- //- /- // /- //- /- // //- And don't lie about what I said in reply to Bruce. I don't like //- liars. /- /- // /- // /- // /- // /- // /- // /- // // Well I try not to lie but in your case what are you going to do about // it. Get your solicitor involved and the police like you claim to have // done last time . /- /- // /- // /- // // Your alter boy ego 'Denise' with the wings of a Dove, as well as // yourself seem rather liberal with the term 'idiot', yet squeal like // a little 'deliverance' piggy when at the end of any. /- /- // /- // /- // // How about I call you a tosser and a very yellow tosser at that. Also // how about I meet you and you can bring Denise if you want LOL. /- /- // /- // /- // // I'll say no more to you for at least a fortnight. /- /- /- /- You're drunk again, aren't you larry............. / / / / You know I'm of a mind to report you to Ofsted and show with your own / words them what a nasty, arrogant, intolerant piece of work you are. / / - Those all the qualities that are needed in a school inspector. Well Done, Joe! |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 10:36:33 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote:
You're drunk again, aren't you larry............. You know I'm of a mind to report you to Ofsted and show with your own words them what a nasty, arrogant, intolerant piece of work you are. It was 8.30pm when you wrote the first foul piece of bile. "How about I call you a tosser and a very yellow tosser at that. Also how about I meet you and you can bring Denise if you want LOL." You were drunk larry. "I'll say no more to you for at least a fortnight." lasted about an hour. Now why not stuck to your promise to yourself? When you start making drunken threats in public newsgroups from behind your computer; you just look plain silly. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bank Holiday forecast 'mistake' | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Tentative bank Holiday weekend forecast | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Bank Holiday weather and "singularities" | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The Bank Holiday weekend!? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Dates of August Bank Holiday | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |