Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey’s Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University’s Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " ‘Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather’ explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Davenport" wrote in message
... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey’s Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University’s Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " ‘Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather’ explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Ian Bingham, Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 13 September 2013 06:38:21 UTC+1, Ian Bingham wrote:
"Stephen Davenport" wrote in message ... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey’s Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University’s Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. That is because forecasts for the weather on modern charts also contain forecasts for the complete range of other geo-phenomenon. For what it's worth if they could correct them to remopve those butterflies, it would be a disaster. " ‘Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather’ explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Trying to get a reply, you mean? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Stephen Davenport" wrote in message ... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey's Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University's Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " 'Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather' explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Ian Bingham, Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire. You are more likely to get a reply by contacting the lead author: Ian Roulstone. His university page is here with his email at the bottom. (I won't post his email address in case it is harvested.) http://personal.maths.surrey.ac.uk/st/I.Roulstone/ For those who would like a taste of the book without forking out, there is a short article here by the authors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-ro...b_3324110.html Cheers, Alastair. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ...
"Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Stephen Davenport" wrote in message ... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey's Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University's Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " 'Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather' explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Ian Bingham, Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire. You are more likely to get a reply by contacting the lead author: Ian Roulstone. His university page is here with his email at the bottom. (I won't post his email address in case it is harvested.) http://personal.maths.surrey.ac.uk/st/I.Roulstone/ For those who would like a taste of the book without forking out, there is a short article here by the authors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-ro...b_3324110.html Cheers, Alastair. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Thanks, Alastair, I'll contact him. He'll probably think, "What's this dummkopf talking about?" Ian. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ... "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Stephen Davenport" wrote in message ... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey's Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University's Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " 'Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather' explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Ian Bingham, Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire. You are more likely to get a reply by contacting the lead author: Ian Roulstone. His university page is here with his email at the bottom. (I won't post his email address in case it is harvested.) http://personal.maths.surrey.ac.uk/st/I.Roulstone/ For those who would like a taste of the book without forking out, there is a short article here by the authors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-ro...b_3324110.html Cheers, Alastair. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Thanks, Alastair, I'll contact him. He'll probably think, "What's this dummkopf talking about?" Ian. I doubt that! He will be VERY pleased to hear from one of their readers especially if you are appeciative. Moreover, they will be keeping a list of corrections (and comments) in the hope that the book goes into a second edition! OTOH, don't tell him he is wrong. Remember the song "Two lovely black eyes". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxoesda-QK0 Cheers, Alastair. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ...
"Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ... "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Stephen Davenport" wrote in message ... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey's Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University's Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " 'Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather' explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Ian Bingham, Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire. You are more likely to get a reply by contacting the lead author: Ian Roulstone. His university page is here with his email at the bottom. (I won't post his email address in case it is harvested.) http://personal.maths.surrey.ac.uk/st/I.Roulstone/ For those who would like a taste of the book without forking out, there is a short article here by the authors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-ro...b_3324110.html Cheers, Alastair. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Thanks, Alastair, I'll contact him. He'll probably think, "What's this dummkopf talking about?" Ian. I doubt that! He will be VERY pleased to hear from one of their readers especially if you are appeciative. Moreover, they will be keeping a list of corrections (and comments) in the hope that the book goes into a second edition! OTOH, don't tell him he is wrong. Remember the song "Two lovely black eyes". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxoesda-QK0 Cheers, Alastair. ============================================ That's a lovely breath of the old Victorian Music Hall. When I was a kid my granny had an old cracked gramophone record of Caruso singing the Italian original, where the two lovely black eyes presumably belonged to some Italian maiden. Ian. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ian Bingham" wrote in message
... "Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ... "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ... "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Stephen Davenport" wrote in message ... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey's Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University's Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " 'Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather' explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Ian Bingham, Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire. You are more likely to get a reply by contacting the lead author: Ian Roulstone. His university page is here with his email at the bottom. (I won't post his email address in case it is harvested.) http://personal.maths.surrey.ac.uk/st/I.Roulstone/ For those who would like a taste of the book without forking out, there is a short article here by the authors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-ro...b_3324110.html Cheers, Alastair. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Thanks, Alastair, I'll contact him. He'll probably think, "What's this dummkopf talking about?" Ian. I doubt that! He will be VERY pleased to hear from one of their readers especially if you are appeciative. Moreover, they will be keeping a list of corrections (and comments) in the hope that the book goes into a second edition! OTOH, don't tell him he is wrong. Remember the song "Two lovely black eyes". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxoesda-QK0 Cheers, Alastair. ============================================ That's a lovely breath of the old Victorian Music Hall. When I was a kid my granny had an old cracked gramophone record of Caruso singing the Italian original, where the two lovely black eyes presumably belonged to some Italian maiden. Ian. ================================================== =================== I have now heard from Prof.Roulstone. The text is actually correct as it stands but he admits it is confusing. Apparently the printer did not follow their instructions about a certain diagram and when they asked for it to be changed, the printer said it would be easier if they let the diagram stand and altered the text. He asked my permission to forward my e-mail to the editor to help press their case for altering the diagram, to which I readily agreed of course. So it looks as if my query was not in vain. Ian. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ... "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Alastair McDonald" wrote in message ... "Ian Bingham" wrote in message ... "Stephen Davenport" wrote in message ... http://bit.ly/184M73L (University of Surrey). "According to a new book written by Surrey's Professor Ian Roulstone and Oxford University's Professor John Norbury, the weather will never be entirely predictable, despite being one of the most highly studied and technologically advanced sciences in the modern world. " 'Invisible in the Storm: The Role of Mathematics in Understanding Weather' explores how mathematics and meteorology come together [...] taking readers on a fascinating journey through the work of trailblazing scientists over the past 100 years." Stephen. Yes, must be about the most readable technical meteorology book I have ever read. I thought I noticed an error near the top of p.182, where it flatly contradicted something in the middle of the previous page. I communicated this to Princeton UP but got no reply, so perhaps the error might have been mine. Ian Bingham, Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire. You are more likely to get a reply by contacting the lead author: Ian Roulstone. His university page is here with his email at the bottom. (I won't post his email address in case it is harvested.) http://personal.maths.surrey.ac.uk/st/I.Roulstone/ For those who would like a taste of the book without forking out, there is a short article here by the authors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-ro...b_3324110.html Cheers, Alastair. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Thanks, Alastair, I'll contact him. He'll probably think, "What's this dummkopf talking about?" Ian. I doubt that! He will be VERY pleased to hear from one of their readers especially if you are appeciative. Moreover, they will be keeping a list of corrections (and comments) in the hope that the book goes into a second edition! OTOH, don't tell him he is wrong. Remember the song "Two lovely black eyes". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxoesda-QK0 Cheers, Alastair. ============================================ That's a lovely breath of the old Victorian Music Hall. When I was a kid my granny had an old cracked gramophone record of Caruso singing the Italian original, where the two lovely black eyes presumably belonged to some Italian maiden. Ian. ================================================== =================== I have now heard from Prof.Roulstone. The text is actually correct as it stands but he admits it is confusing. Apparently the printer did not follow their instructions about a certain diagram and when they asked for it to be changed, the printer said it would be easier if they let the diagram stand and altered the text. He asked my permission to forward my e-mail to the editor to help press their case for altering the diagram, to which I readily agreed of course. So it looks as if my query was not in vain. Ian. Well spotted, and well done! Cheers, Alastair. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(book) "Tornado Watch--Meteorology of Severe Storms........... | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Where is the meteorology on SGM? I demand meteorology | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Opinions on The Weather Wizard's Cloud Book book and poster | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
New Book - Quite pleased that I have..... | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Meteorology Book Recommendation | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |