On Thursday, 5 December 2013 21:24:42 UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article ,

Lawrence Jenkins writes

On Thursday, 5 December 2013 17:06:54 UTC, Malcolm wrote:

In article , Jim



Cannon writes



On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:37:45 AM UTC, Jim Kewley wrote:



In message , Jim







Cannon writes







Are you, Dawlish and Paul Garvey the same person. Sock puppets?















Funny you should say that, I read your laughable gibberish and wonder







the same about you.







To all the doubters on here who thought there wasnt storm coming -



take a look out the window. I REST MY CASE!!!!!!!!!!! ANOTHER



TRIUMPH!!!!!!!!!







Triumph of what? Getting the date wrong by more than a week?







You haven't a case to rest. All you produced was a failed forecast.





How many memorable but exaggerated storms last year Malcolm?



What's that got to do with a failed forecast which Jimbo has claimed as

a "TRIUMPH!"?



Nothing.



--

Malcolm

It has everything to do with it. If someone were to say next winter there will be no major storms and there is -well that was wrong. If someone says there will be several serious storms than that is the complete opposite of no storms of note. So just to predict a couple of notable events is a forecast in itself. Now my take is known well now that most weather events nowadays are totally overspun none the less Jude the obscure and his storm and this current load of rubbish are still stronger and more notable than any winter storm we've had across large parts of the British Isles in years. So therefore to even predict one or none is a accurate prediction. Say the met office said in its now very hushed and hidden LRF there will be two major storms this winter affecting the British Isles..... well most here would sore be afraid of their forecasting abilities . That is my point.