On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote:



You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads

specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a

break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this

forecast can then be judged.



Obsessed?

That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies

to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'.



Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look

silly.

--

Col



Bolton, Lancashire

160m asl

Snow videos:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again. For me, here are two idiots on here that post, unfortunately, on a regular basis; larry and cannon. Neither usually deserve more than a single word reply - and yes; they deserve it when they post idiocy.

Happy? Probably not, but it's not going to change and I hope you'll wake up in a better mood, Col. *))

Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote:



You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads

specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a

break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this

forecast can then be judged.



Obsessed?

That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies

to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'.



Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself
look

silly.

--

Col



Bolton, Lancashire

160m asl

Snow videos:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing,
over and over again. For me, here are two idiots on here that post,
unfortunately, on a regular basis; larry and cannon. Neither usually
deserve more than a single word reply - and yes; they deserve it when
they post idiocy.

Wouldn't it be easier just to ignore them, I don't see what you get out
of this. Plus, it also gives the impression you can't refute their
arguments,
now I know you can, so why make it look like you can't?

Happy? Probably not, but it's not going to change and I hope you'll
wake up in a better mood, Col. *))

Just because I draw attention to your double-standards doesn't mean
I am in a bad mood.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:56:09 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote:

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:

Dawlish wrote:







You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads



specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a



break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this



forecast can then be judged.







Obsessed?



That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies



to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'.







Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself

look



silly.



--



Col







Bolton, Lancashire



160m asl



Snow videos:



http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg



It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing,

over and over again. For me, here are two idiots on here that post,

unfortunately, on a regular basis; larry and cannon. Neither usually

deserve more than a single word reply - and yes; they deserve it when

they post idiocy.



Wouldn't it be easier just to ignore them, I don't see what you get out

of this. Plus, it also gives the impression you can't refute their

arguments,

now I know you can, so why make it look like you can't?



Happy? Probably not, but it's not going to change and I hope you'll

wake up in a better mood, Col. *))



Just because I draw attention to your double-standards doesn't mean

I am in a bad mood.

--

Col



Bolton, Lancashire

160m asl

Snow videos:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Why should I ignore them and where exactly are 'double standards' (apart from saying it to two of them, on occasions, of course) *)). Isn't it entirely up to an individual whether and to whom, they reply and as long as it is not abusive, or threatening, there is nothing to stop them saying what they wish, as far as I am aware.

PS If you find the term; "Idiot", abusive, threatening, or even bullying, I would imagine almost all the UK population has been guilty at some time. Now threatening physical violence and using foul language in the newsgroup is a different matter, as I'm sure you would agree.

Dawlish wrote:

Why should I ignore them and where exactly are 'double standards'
(apart from saying it to two of them, on occasions, of course) *)).
Isn't it entirely up to an individual whether and to whom, they reply
and as long as it is not abusive, or threatening, there is nothing to
stop them saying what they wish, as far as I am aware.

The 'double-standards' are you picking Lawrence up for starting
threads about you then you doing something equally daft as in
trotting yound after him calling him an 'idiot' at every opportunity.

PS If you find the term; "Idiot", abusive, threatening, or even
bullying, I would imagine almost all the UK population has been
guilty at some time. Now threatening physical violence and using foul
language in the newsgroup is a different matter, as I'm sure you
would agree.

I don't find the term particulary abusive, I never said that.
I just find it tedious to see you use it over and over again.

It's pointless, it adds nothing to the discussion so why persist
with it?
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:05:38 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote:



Why should I ignore them and where exactly are 'double standards'

(apart from saying it to two of them, on occasions, of course) *)).

Isn't it entirely up to an individual whether and to whom, they reply

and as long as it is not abusive, or threatening, there is nothing to

stop them saying what they wish, as far as I am aware.



The 'double-standards' are you picking Lawrence up for starting

threads about you then you doing something equally daft as in

trotting yound after him calling him an 'idiot' at every opportunity.



PS If you find the term; "Idiot", abusive, threatening, or even

bullying, I would imagine almost all the UK population has been

guilty at some time. Now threatening physical violence and using foul

language in the newsgroup is a different matter, as I'm sure you

would agree.



I don't find the term particulary abusive, I never said that.

I just find it tedious to see you use it over and over again.



It's pointless, it adds nothing to the discussion so why persist

with it?

--

Col



Bolton, Lancashire

160m asl

Snow videos:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

"Tedious", fine. There is all sorts of tediousness on this newsgroup, but it is in the eye of the beholder. People who are abusive and threatening - well we'd never tolerate them. Surely you wouldn't, would you?

On 21/11/2013 09:32, Dawlish wrote:


"Tedious", fine. There is all sorts of tediousness on this newsgroup,
but it is in the eye of the beholder. People who are abusive and
threatening - well we'd never tolerate them. Surely you wouldn't,
would you?


Unfortunately a lot of valued posters *have* decided not to tolerate
them...

--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

On 20/11/2013 07:17, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote:



You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads

specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a

break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this

forecast can then be judged.



Obsessed?

That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies

to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'.



Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look

silly.

--

Col



Bolton, Lancashire

160m asl

Snow videos:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again.

It may be a better idea have a set of stock rebuttals stored somewhere.
Whenever you feel the urge to reply to another idiotic post, cut and
paste with the subject line something like ***Automated xxx response***
(where xxx is the subject of the rebuttal), then cut and paste the
response, job done. That may make it easier for others to filter out
your replies as well, plus you get to challenge the same rubbish over
and over again to the point where, just maybe, it may discourage people
from posting rubbish. Just a thought.

On Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:16:14 PM UTC, Adam Lea wrote:
On 20/11/2013 07:17, Dawlish wrote:

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:

Dawlish wrote:







You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads



specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a



break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this



forecast can then be judged.







Obsessed?



That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies



to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'.







Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look



silly.



--



Col







Bolton, Lancashire



160m asl



Snow videos:



http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg



It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again.



It may be a better idea have a set of stock rebuttals stored somewhere.

Whenever you feel the urge to reply to another idiotic post, cut and

paste with the subject line something like ***Automated xxx response***

(where xxx is the subject of the rebuttal), then cut and paste the

response, job done. That may make it easier for others to filter out

your replies as well, plus you get to challenge the same rubbish over

and over again to the point where, just maybe, it may discourage people

from posting rubbish. Just a thought.

Or I could challenge idiocy when I see it in whatever way I wish, or decide not to, as I wish. *))

On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction.



**On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. **



There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year.. *))

I doubt whether this forecast won't achieve outcome now (must be one of the easier forecasts, again, I suppose?). It also looks as if the HP will extend beyond the 28th, but possibly not to T+240, unless the models (especially the GEM) show more agreement than they do this morning. My confidence in that happening is not high enough.

Would this be a "difficult" time to forecast, or does anyone feel that the 10-day forecast for 3rd December is another easy one?

On Saturday, 23 November 2013 09:30:57 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:

Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction.







**On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. **







There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *))



I doubt whether this forecast won't achieve outcome now (must be one of the easier forecasts, again, I suppose?). It also looks as if the HP will extend beyond the 28th, but possibly not to T+240, unless the models (especially the GEM) show more agreement than they do this morning. My confidence in that happening is not high enough.



Would this be a "difficult" time to forecast, or does anyone feel that the 10-day forecast for 3rd December is another easy one?

IDIOT