You are heading again down the larry route, as you are struggling to support the OP writer. I suggest you actually read the thread again much more carefully.



Here's the clue to understanding my position and my reply *again*: "Cool eh?" No it most certainly isn't.

You are correct and I offer my apologies.
You were completely unable to contribute positively to the weather question, so decided to make a pathetic personal attack.
See, it's easy to admit you're wrong, but something you'll never do.

Cool eh? Well no. The weather question of the moment most certainly isn't.

It's a pity the person who offered this self-centred little comment on the weather situation has decided he hasn't got the guts to back the comment and instead leaves it to acolytes like you.

On Sunday, 16 February 2014 08:15:51 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Cool eh? Well no. The weather question of the moment most certainly isn't..



It's a pity the person who offered this self-centred little comment on the weather situation has decided he hasn't got the guts to back the comment and instead leaves it to acolytes like you.

You really don't get it do you? No doubt you haven't even bothered to search out the John Kettley piece on Radio 2. If you did, you may (but I doubt it) begin to understand how people feel about the weather, something that someone like you will sadly never understand. The only self-centred (sic) person making comments is you.
Don't insult me by bringing a term such as acolyte into the conversation, but wonder how long you had to search for a word that you felt was imaginative. It's not, nor appropriate.
I'll comment on anything I feel inappropriate, which your remark was and why would Will need guts to respond to something like that? Frankly, I don't know why I'm even bothering wasting my time. (Actually I do know why, it's in the forlorn hope that one day you'll get completely fed up with people who have the nerve to stand up to you. It probably will never happen, but hey, I'll get a small amount of pleasure by annoying you in the meantime - as you do others).
Oh, and your second American spelling of the week.

I didn't bring in acolyte. Someone else did to describe you and the cap clearly fits.

Again: "Cool eh?" No; in the context of the floods this winter, self-satisfied celebration of an individual, very short-term, personal rain record, with not a mention of the suffering of so many in the current floods, it certainly isn't.

Geddit?

David Mitchell wrote:
Are you a smug, self satisfied git too ?

Another very sad man, why the need for this?
Actually, no I'm not.


Well you did mention that you shared Little Willie's emotions ?

He's a smug, self satisfied git. It seems, based on your own statement, you
must be too ?



--
Reg

Graham P Davis wrote:
On 15 Feb 2014 04:45:25 GMT

Just checked his postings for the past year and found he's contributed
nothing of use to the group in all that time so off he goes into my
file-13.





Oh no ! Not the dreaded file 13 please anything but that.


--
Reg

Well you did mention that you shared Little Willie's emotions ?
He's a smug, self satisfied git. It seems, based on your own statement, you
must be too ?

Reg

What I share along with millions of people is an emotional reaction to weather. If you have a genuine interest of this subject, somewhere inside you, you should be able to appreciate that. This being the case, does that make us all self-satisfied gits? Even if I was, there are worse things in life, so as an attempted insult, it's a fail.

Why on earth you would want to join this debate I have no idea, what on earth has it do do with you?

However, ironically, your comment in itself, indicates a degree of self-satisfaction. A shame that you probably won't be able to comprehend that.

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:05:15 AM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
Well you did mention that you shared Little Willie's emotions ?

He's a smug, self satisfied git. It seems, based on your own statement, you

must be too ?



Reg



What I share along with millions of people is an emotional reaction to weather. If you have a genuine interest of this subject, somewhere inside you, you should be able to appreciate that. This being the case, does that make us all self-satisfied gits? Even if I was, there are worse things in life, so as an attempted insult, it's a fail.



Why on earth you would want to join this debate I have no idea, what on earth has it do do with you?



However, ironically, your comment in itself, indicates a degree of self-satisfaction. A shame that you probably won't be able to comprehend that.

Anyone can join any debate. Sometimes people don't like what people say, but that's Usenet. He did have a point, David and your staunch support of one person who has decided he doesn't wish to post, but does (or doesn't, who knows) can elicits views such as that. Some people aren't all that happy about that person's comment of; "Cool eh" when other people are suffering to an enormous degree with that amount of rain. You've never condemned it and I would imagine Reg doesn't like that - hence his comment.

Anyone can join any debate. Sometimes people don't like what people say, but that's Usenet. He did have a point, David and your staunch support of one person who has decided he doesn't wish to post, but does (or doesn't, who knows) can elicits views such as that. Some people aren't all that happy about that person's comment of; "Cool eh" when other people are suffering to an enormous degree with that amount of rain. You've never condemned it and I would imagine Reg doesn't like that - hence his comment.

Smug, self-satisfied is a great contribution in your opinion? Grow up.
I'll refer you to my opening remark, "Like many have said on here before, no-one would wish anyone's life or property to be affected by the weather, however it's inevitable." But I don't condemn the remark, because he wasn't referring to that, as you well know. Presumably everyone else on here is also a self-satisfied git for not commenting also. And if it wasn't Will, you wouldn't have made it.
I made the same remark in a post recently and you never commented.
I will support anyone on here who is in the receipt of bullying type comments, it's just that you aim them at one person, as you have a version of penis envy i.e. Will envy.

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:26:44 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
Anyone can join any debate. Sometimes people don't like what people say, but that's Usenet. He did have a point, David and your staunch support of one person who has decided he doesn't wish to post, but does (or doesn't, who knows) can elicits views such as that. Some people aren't all that happy about that person's comment of; "Cool eh" when other people are suffering to an enormous degree with that amount of rain. You've never condemned it and I would imagine Reg doesn't like that - hence his comment.



Smug, self-satisfied is a great contribution in your opinion? Grow up.

I'll refer you to my opening remark, "Like many have said on here before, no-one would wish anyone's life or property to be affected by the weather, however it's inevitable." But I don't condemn the remark, because he wasn't referring to that, as you well know. Presumably everyone else on here is also a self-satisfied git for not commenting also. And if it wasn't Will, you wouldn't have made it.

I made the same remark in a post recently and you never commented.

I will support anyone on here who is in the receipt of bullying type comments, it's just that you aim them at one person, as you have a version of penis envy i.e. Will envy.

Oh dear. Not going well when you are reduced to that, is it?

I'll refer you (yet *again*) to my opening remark to Will's desperate need for comments from a newsgroup to which he doesn't apparently post and which you studiously avoid any reference to in your replies:

"Cool eh?": no; it most certainly isn't.