On Friday, 7 March 2014 07:52:55 UTC, vidcapper wrote:
On 07/03/2014 05:19, Col wrote: "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message ... So its a linear process doubling co2 twice the effect. Is it not an *exponential* process, beyond a certain point at least. You reach a certain level, a 'tipping point' if you like and you get runaway warming. That's why nobody books holidays on Venus. -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Actually most people seem to love green house temperatures as witnessed by millions making their holiday choices. I see that Filey , Skegness and even Margate aren't frequented as much as they used to be. Now of course this could be due to AGW and the rising sea levels , the unbearable Mediterranean summers or simply its cool an miserable with the sea where its been for literally centuries cold and muddy.

On Thursday, 6 March 2014 19:42:00 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
The Max Clifford of AGW bloggers is telling us how warm the global temperatures have been. Nope folks February UAH data shows the cooling trend of four years and the plateau of the 18 years shows no major trend either way. Maybe that's why the Phantom Ofsted Blower of Dartmoor is strangley silent on this one. Could it be that 80ppm that humans have put into the atmosphere has reached a saturation point where it no longer has any effect on catastrophic warming. The Arctic Fox, Emperor Penquin, cuddly Polar Bear, the Clown Fish, ringed Seals and Tattooed Punk Squid. Don't give up it will get better. http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/03/...14-0-17-deg-c/

Okay so as I already knew its not linear so therefore thae fact co2 is still rising but tempertaures don't reflect that particular trajectory tells me that hey, something may not be going to plan.

On Friday, March 7, 2014 12:45:59 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Thursday, 6 March 2014 19:42:00 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

The Max Clifford of AGW bloggers is telling us how warm the global temperatures have been. Nope folks February UAH data shows the cooling trend of four years and the plateau of the 18 years shows no major trend either way.. Maybe that's why the Phantom Ofsted Blower of Dartmoor is strangley silent on this one. Could it be that 80ppm that humans have put into the atmosphere has reached a saturation point where it no longer has any effect on catastrophic warming. The Arctic Fox, Emperor Penquin, cuddly Polar Bear, the Clown Fish, ringed Seals and Tattooed Punk Squid. Don't give up it will get better. http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/03/...14-0-17-deg-c/



Okay so as I already knew its not linear so therefore thae fact co2 is still rising but tempertaures don't reflect that particular trajectory tells me that hey, something may not be going to plan.

There is no "plan" just an idiot from Sydenham who lacks a great deal of understanding and underlines the idiocy with threads like this.

Go do some research, for goodness sake.

in 395883 20140307 125744 Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, March 7, 2014 12:45:59 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Thursday, 6 March 2014 19:42:00 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

The Max Clifford of AGW bloggers is telling us how warm the global temp=
eratures have been. Nope folks February UAH data shows the cooling trend of=
four years and the plateau of the 18 years shows no major trend either way=
.. Maybe that's why the Phantom Ofsted Blower of Dartmoor is strangley silen=
t on this one. Could it be that 80ppm that humans have put into the atmosph=
ere has reached a saturation point where it no longer has any effect on cat=
astrophic warming. The Arctic Fox, Emperor Penquin, cuddly Polar Bear, the =
Clown Fish, ringed Seals and Tattooed Punk Squid. Don't give up it will get=
better. http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/03/...ature-update-=
for-february-2014-0-17-deg-c/



Okay so as I already knew its not linear so therefore thae fact co2 is st=
ill rising but tempertaures don't reflect that particular trajectory tells =
me that hey, something may not be going to plan.

There is no "plan" just an idiot from Sydenham who lacks a great deal of un=
derstanding and underlines the idiocy with threads like this.

Go do some research, for goodness sake.

There will always be idiots and trolls on Usenet. Responding to them only
prolongs the agony.

On Saturday, March 8, 2014 8:27:12 AM UTC, Bob Martin wrote:
in 395883 20140307 125744 Dawlish wrote:

On Friday, March 7, 2014 12:45:59 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Thursday, 6 March 2014 19:42:00 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:



The Max Clifford of AGW bloggers is telling us how warm the global temp=

eratures have been. Nope folks February UAH data shows the cooling trend of=

four years and the plateau of the 18 years shows no major trend either way=

.. Maybe that's why the Phantom Ofsted Blower of Dartmoor is strangley silen=

t on this one. Could it be that 80ppm that humans have put into the atmosph=

ere has reached a saturation point where it no longer has any effect on cat=

astrophic warming. The Arctic Fox, Emperor Penquin, cuddly Polar Bear, the =

Clown Fish, ringed Seals and Tattooed Punk Squid. Don't give up it will get=

better. http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/03/...ature-update-=

for-february-2014-0-17-deg-c/







Okay so as I already knew its not linear so therefore thae fact co2 is st=

ill rising but tempertaures don't reflect that particular trajectory tells =

me that hey, something may not be going to plan.



There is no "plan" just an idiot from Sydenham who lacks a great deal of un=

derstanding and underlines the idiocy with threads like this.



Go do some research, for goodness sake.



There will always be idiots and trolls on Usenet. Responding to them only

prolongs the agony.

Sensible advice Bob. I have stopped responding by not posting any more on alt.global-warming. That is just a troll pit of far right-wing, low IQ, denialist nutters, to be honest.

There are very few in this newsgroup and the few that are there get challenged, not just by me. That seems a reasonable and manageable amount to watch fall to pieces under the lightest of pressure - there is entertainment value in this!