A gold mine landslide in Honduras has trapped 11 workers, Online medias reported. Landslide occurred at a gold mine in San Juan Arriba in a vertical tunnel at a depth of about 80 m (260 ft), BBC News updated quoting firefighter spokesman Oscar Triminio. Original post: Natural Disasters List July 3, 20...

http://www.disaster-report.com/

That means a big quake is due or maybe it will be an high VEI volcanic eruption?

On 03/07/2014 17:46, Weatherlawyer wrote:

A gold mine landslide in Honduras has trapped 11 workers, Online
medias reported.

Strange phrasing here - it implies the goldmine *chose* to do it...

Landslide occurred at a gold mine in San Juan Arriba
in a vertical tunnel at a depth of about 80 m (260 ft), BBC News
updated quoting firefighter spokesman Oscar Triminio. Original post:
Natural Disasters List July 3, 20...



--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

On Friday, 4 July 2014 07:10:36 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:
On 03/07/2014 17:46, Weatherlawyer wrote:

A gold mine landslide in Honduras has trapped 11 workers
Strange phrasing here - it implies the goldmine *chose* to do it...

How do you work that out?
Do you mean the fact it was a gold mine gives it more personality?

FOADawlish

In article ,
says...


A gold mine landslide


How do you work that out?

The gold mine landslide as opposed to the normal rain induced variety
landslide?
The landslide belonging to the gold mine, perhaps?
The landslide created and nurtered by the gold mine, even?

There is certainly an implication, albeit weak, that there is a more
than casual link between the gold mine and the landslide.

--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

On Friday, 4 July 2014 17:55:41 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:

The gold mine landslide as opposed to the normal rain induced variety
landslide?

The landslide belonging to the gold mine, perhaps?
The landslide created and nurtured by the gold mine, even?

There is certainly an implication, albeit weak, that there is a more
than casual link between the gold mine and the landslide.

It is always surprising how much fun a gang of white people can have at the expense of any amount of brown skinned ones.

Well done you for being clever. Very Hunnish, if you will pardon my punnish Don't let me spoil the fun. I will try not to laugh when it is your turn.

Or not as the case may be.

On Friday, 4 July 2014 20:18:20 UTC+1, Malcolm wrote:
In article ,

Weatherlawyer writes

FOADawlish

You don't have to be Dawlish to be stupid. You are like that dirty farter Eggingon. You just need to smear and be very subjective in your mannerisms.

As it happens there is no signal for earthquakes in the other charts I use. However there is a plethora of circumstantial evidence:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ai...=691&dpr= 0.9

https://www.google.co.uk/search?safe...37.TluVbiSChrM

https://www.google.co.uk/search?safe...83.72n5auFMBnk

Just because it isn't likely to be an earthquake is no reason for anyone to drop their guard. Vorticity is increasing in this spell as behooves the lunar phase. And the time limit is running out for any connectivity with the lost causes above. So perhps the warning such as it wasn't was issued too late for everyone but you.

Several people have screwed up including perahps myself.

So now, how does that make you fel?
Have you accomplished anything?
Is this newsgroup better off because of what you have to say?
Do you contribute anything to anything?
Or are you just a **** like Dawlish?

I think you are dawlish.
Prove me wrong.

Or FOAD.
Either way I don't care. I think you are a pointless tit -ultimately useless.

A perfect self-description by W. Perfect and hilarious projection. No large quake. No large eruption. 0/2.

Not doing terribly well are we? And to cap it all, you haven't the computer skills to figure out that Malcolm is not me.

Idiot.

On Saturday, 5 July 2014 12:33:45 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
A perfect self-description by W. Perfect and hilarious projection. No large quake. No large eruption. 0/2.



Not doing terribly well are we? And to cap it all, you haven't the computer skills to figure out that Malcolm is not me.



Idiot.



Rolf goes in You come out. How weird is that.

On Thursday, 3 July 2014 17:46:36 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:

A gold mine landslide in Honduras has trapped 11 workers, Online medias reported. Landslide occurred at a gold mine in San Juan Arriba in a vertical tunnel at a depth of about 80 m (260 ft), BBC News updated quoting firefighter spokesman Oscar Triminio. Original post: Natural Disasters List July 3, 20...

http://www.disaster-report.com/

That means a big quake is due or maybe it will be an high VEI volcanic eruption?

Or a Cat 5 Storm?

I must admit I never saw that one coming and although (for those of you who are hard of reading) I did modify the thread title with a question mark, it is a fact that most large quakes are accompanied by traffic accidents and mining disasters.

This is due to the fact that safety measures are not designed to cope with the brainwaves of fools. and at certain sound frequencies in certain weather conditions without taking measures to protect ourselves, those with the necessary allergies can and will suffer brain farts when the register goes into the red.

Why geologists must insist that I am wrong when all they have is an hypothesis to guide them -despite the statistics...
Ah well, the point is such statistics don't apply to hurricanes.
Do they apply to periods of high VEI outpourings?

I don't know. I do know a plethora of tornadoes rapidly gives way to very few when such a cycle responds to nature. And a simultaneous drop in medium sized earthquakes occurs.

Also to be found are rows of lows -especially where they are of a tropical nature (but that is the nature of the tropical baseline at all times, isn't it?)

The difficulty lies in the state of the AAO which is remarkably exaggerated to date. (It has been positive since early May.)

Normally a large quake signal is seen as a straight run of precipitation from the eastern seaboard of South America or Africa and sometimes the western coast of Australia, straight down into Antarctica. And the black mass has to disappear.

This doesn't happen with the reversal of weather conditions produced in a positive AAO:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=83944

And it is unlikely that a severe quake can occur with a very large tropical storm taking all the world's energy. When the storm fades though...
But usually what happens is that an eruption will occur, the signals for which seem to be quite apparent in the BoM chart as of today (6 July 2014):

A dark mass will touch the coast of Antarctica and not die. Instead it will split off a centre that can run around the coast for quite some distance as a small cyclone.

http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/char...Refresh+ View