On Thursday, 7 August 2014 22:18:58 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:

This generally the purpose of fake accounts:

The entire thing is super shady (don't talk about clients, don't talk about targets, ect. ect.) but is surprisingly well organized. They actually have three 'groups'.

Group A farms accounts, that is they make a bunch of social media accounts and forum accounts and spend all day contributing to these communities building up a reputation within that community. These accounts get passed off to Group B and sometimes are sold in batches.

Group B takes established accounts from Group A and actively ****s on client competitors ect. talks up/lies about the usefulness of their clients. Eventually Group B's reputation plummets and they are known to be a biased unreasonable person. Now they go to Group C

Group C essentially is cold storage used for new clients that may require your services against old clients. Having a community member with a history of supporting client A suddenly endorse their competitor or perhaps even start to change their tune about client A is a useful service.

Of course given how shady they do everything clients don't know that they are working for both sides...it's a total ****show.

http://www.vice.com/read/trolls-paid...y-articles-806

Obviously Dawlish isn't in that league he is far too naive.
But for reasons that lack explanation a team of Usenet abusers think it is good sense to overwhelm a thread full of reason with one of rhetoric.

Let's start one off:

The GOES format at the moment literally shows the free fall of cold air into a calm lower atmosphere, transforming the outer margins of the Hadley Cells in two oceans into trains of vortex clouds.

One in the North Pacific is running west north west from Mexico to China, the other is running north east from Mexico to Europe.

This effect or phenomenon has the theory of Coriolis effect by the short and curlies. Which raises the question:
What colour is carbon dioxide?

Actually the persistence of the numbers of people still willing to engage in a discussion of Glowballs shows that that the unleashing of "idiots with a cause" is beyond control. There doesn't seem to be a half life to a religion without a god.

All that is required for a reaction is reaction and they make a home run. It doesn't matter to them the stadium is empty and the crowd never even arrived in the daylight. This is a British game and never required it be watched.

And better than cricket, they can stand out in a field in the pouring rain.
Yes, it a game designed for wet sheep. And it is one they love to win. So how is it played?

Since they are shep the only calls they can make are BAAH!

And since they are sheep the only moves they can make are the ones peculiar to rounders. So what they play is something akin to a game of rounders without a stick. And since they are particularly naive/incompetent or just plain stooopid, it isn't a game as complex as monopoly.

Do they make point?
Not if they don't have to. So what do they make?

Cackaphoney.

That would be a good name for sheep's game especially sheep with lot and lots of dags. However there already is a game like the one they play:
Ludo or they say: Raaa-daaaal-daaag. (It's not Norwegian you may be thinking of Scrapie, a game for cannibal sheep on longboat-rides.)

It was taken from the Indian gambling game called snap or bingo a game for serious gamblers that don't like to waste time giving their money away -for creatures that love to run in ever decreasing circles until their fear is on the other side of the crowd and is eventually awarded to the deadest.

I'd ask Dawlish: "If I am right, would he tell the rest of us?" but all I ever get from him is the sound of hooves in perpetual motion and diarrhoea drying.

..

On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 12:49:03 UTC+1, MartinR wrote: