http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7

And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since December.

It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming. All authorities class this as extremely likely that this will continue into the future and the IPCC says it is around 95% probable that this warming has and is, being caused by people. Almost every climate scientists and every National Science Academy on earth believes that to be the case.

Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7

And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since December.

It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming. All
authorities class this as extremely likely that this will continue into the
future and the IPCC says it is around 95% probable that this warming has and
is, being caused by people. Almost every climate scientists and every
National Science Academy on earth believes that to be the case.


Could the "pause" be caused by Arctic ice not cooperating?

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/icecover/icecover_current.png

On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:37:09 PM UTC+1, Hyacinth Bucket wrote:
Dawlish wrote:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7



And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since December.



It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming. All

authorities class this as extremely likely that this will continue into the

future and the IPCC says it is around 95% probable that this warming has and

is, being caused by people. Almost every climate scientists and every

National Science Academy on earth believes that to be the case.

Could the "pause" be caused by Arctic ice not cooperating?

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/icecover/icecover_current.png

What "pause"would that be?

On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 15:25:39 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7



And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since December..



It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming. All authorities class this as extremely likely that this will continue into the future and the IPCC says it is around 95% probable that this warming has and is, being caused by people. Almost every climate scientists and every National Science Academy on earth believes that to be the case.




I would also add that to include hurricane Arthur into the mix as some sort of treat of Hurricanes to come is absolutely pathetic and sure totally the bias these NOAA people are trying to coerce on us all. Go look at wiki at USA Hurricanes and just see how there were far more devastating storm in a cooler and warmer lower CO2 period of time.

These people have such an agenda its starting to raise eyebrows

On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 4:25:39 PM UTC+2, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7



And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since December..



It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming. All authorities class this as extremely likely that this will continue into the future and the IPCC says it is around 95% probable that this warming has and is, being caused by people. Almost every climate scientists and every National Science Academy on earth believes that to be the case.

Dullish, you sad, leftie warmist. You, and those like you, will be a minority soon - and not before time, either.

CK

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Dawlish wrote:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7

And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since
December.

It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming. All
authorities class this as extremely likely that this will continue
into the future and the IPCC says it is around 95% probable that this
warming has and is, being caused by people. Almost every climate
scientists and every National Science Academy on earth believes that
to be the case.

GISS has last month in 11th place. The difference is probably due to
the way the other sources make no attempt to interpolate for
data-sparse areas such as the Arctic.

The 12 month period ending in July is the 3rd warmest in the record.
Here's a graph of those 12-monthly means plus a rolling 11-year average.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/scarle...57626804420653


--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks. Mail: 'newsman' not 'newsboy'.
"Minds are like parachutes. They only function when they're open". -
Lord Dewar (1864-1930)

On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 16:25:39 UTC+2, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7



And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since December.



It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming.

Sigh.
http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/g...v3.2.0-FAQ.pdf

"The reason for the larger number of cold step changes is not completely clear" but we adjust them out to give warming anyway.

On 27/08/14 14:42, matt_sykes wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 16:25:39 UTC+2, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7



And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since
December.



It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming.

Sigh.
http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/g...v3.2.0-FAQ.pdf

"The reason for the larger number of cold step changes is not
completely clear" but we adjust them out to give warming anyway.

Full quote, not truncated after a comma :-

"The reason for the larger number of cold step changes is not completely
clear, but they may be due in part to systematic changes in station
locations from city centers to cooler airport locations that occurred in
many parts of the world from the 1930s through the 1960s."

From the paper:-

"Where can I obtain additional information about the changes that were
made and their impacts on global temperature trends?
NCDC Technical Report No. GHCNM�12�02 provides a detailed summary of
each software modificationand the resulting impacts to global
temperatures. This report is available at

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghc...orts/Technical Report
NCDC No12�02�Distribution.pdf

Is it possible to obtain the computer software code that NCDC uses for
making homogeneitycorrections?

Yes. The Pairwise Homogeneity Adjustment algorithm software is available
online at
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/software/ "

Don't you just love it when deniers do things like that. Just laughable.

On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 17:27:31 UTC+2, RedAcer wrote:
On 27/08/14 14:42, matt_sykes wrote:

On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 16:25:39 UTC+2, Dawlish wrote:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/7







And that is despite La Nina, then ENSO neutral conditions, since

December.







It illustrates perfectly how the world has and still is, warming.



Sigh.

http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/g...v3.2.0-FAQ.pdf



"The reason for the larger number of cold step changes is not

completely clear" but we adjust them out to give warming anyway.



Full quote, not truncated after a comma :-



"The reason for the larger number of cold step changes is not completely

clear, but they may be due in part to systematic changes in station

locations from city centers to cooler airport locations that occurred in

many parts of the world from the 1930s through the 1960s."



From the paper:-



"Where can I obtain additional information about the changes that were

made and their impacts on global temperature trends?

NCDC Technical Report No. GHCNM�12�02 provides a detailed summary of

each software modificationand the resulting impacts to global

temperatures. This report is available at



ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghc...orts/Technical Report

NCDC No12�02�Distribution.pdf



Is it possible to obtain the computer software code that NCDC uses for

making homogeneitycorrections?



Yes. The Pairwise Homogeneity Adjustment algorithm software is available

online at

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/software/ "












maybe? 'we don't know why there are more cold steps but we adjust it up anyway'


Call that science?