In article ,
says...

I addressed all your points lehun. Your difficulty is in answering mine. In the end all you've done is expressed your opinion. What you've failed to do is to recognise that discrimination is in the eye of the discriminated against. Not in the opinion of anyone else - including you.



How about the word 'Ginger'? Is that equally highly discriminatory?

If all discriminatory words and terms are highly discriminatory then the
prefix is not needed surely? We just need to say that it is
discriminatory.

Or perhaps you would like to venture forth some discriminatory words or
terms that you don't consider to be 'highly' discriminatory. Maybe you
would care to share with us how you would differentiate a discriminatory
term from a derogatory one?

...

Which bit is rubbish? That the term now encompasses pre and post
pubescent children as a result of misuse by authority or that it always
has done.

Or that it doesn't really matter whether the victims are pre or post
pubescent?



--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 18:44:28 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
You lead a poor life larry. Ever thought of helping these people, instead of castigating them and hating them?


Again says the man who has on many occasions tried to ridicule me by saying I was a drunkard a man who has worked non stop since the age of 18 and never once relied on anyone yet you try to portray me as a drunkard. If I was out in the park getting ****ed all day , leaving rubbish and not working, yes you could criticise me. And if I ever did finish up that pathetic way as a parasite on society I would have the integrity and honesty to admit it and blame no-one but myself

And now you are demeaning my quality of life.

You call people individuals , to their face behind a key board "idiots" and then accuse me of a descriptive term aimed at life style not a person on their own. I

Your hypocrisy knows no physical limits