http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2015/3

The wolrd is at record warm levels, with only a weak El Nino.

On Friday, 17 April 2015 16:08:04 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2015/3

The wolrd is at record warm levels, with only a weak El Nino.

You sound very pleased about that, which says something about you and your ilk.

On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 12:09:35 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Friday, 17 April 2015 16:08:04 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2015/3

The wolrd is at record warm levels, with only a weak El Nino.

You sound very pleased about that, which says something about you and your ilk.

Pleased?? It's a fact, larry. It's just a fact. I know it is information you don't want to hear as it does not fit with your wishes, but it is, quite simply and no more, a fact that March was the warmest March in the NOAA record, with only a weak El Nino. That's how I presented it and that is what it is.

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:09:35 -0700 (PDT), Lawrence Jenkins
wrote:

On Friday, 17 April 2015 16:08:04 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2015/3

The wolrd is at record warm levels, with only a weak El Nino.

You sound very pleased about that, which says something about you and your ilk.

What part of that short, factual statement makes the writer "sound
very pleased"?

On Saturday, 18 April 2015 07:31:45 UTC+1, Malcolm Ogilvie wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:09:35 -0700 (PDT), Lawrence Jenkins
wrote:

On Friday, 17 April 2015 16:08:04 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2015/3

The wolrd is at record warm levels, with only a weak El Nino.

You sound very pleased about that, which says something about you and your ilk.

What part of that short, factual statement makes the writer "sound
very pleased"?

Because he scrabbles for every piece of apparent bad climate news but denies or ignores the contrary.

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 03:14:20 -0700, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Saturday, 18 April 2015 07:31:45 UTC+1, Malcolm Ogilvie wrote:

What part of that short, factual statement makes the writer "sound very
pleased"?

Because he scrabbles for every piece of apparent bad climate news but
denies or ignores the contrary.

Oh, the irony.

On Saturday, 18 April 2015 11:53:10 UTC+1, Dennis wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 03:14:20 -0700, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Saturday, 18 April 2015 07:31:45 UTC+1, Malcolm Ogilvie wrote:

What part of that short, factual statement makes the writer "sound very
pleased"?

Because he scrabbles for every piece of apparent bad climate news but
denies or ignores the contrary.

Oh, the irony.

Not really as its an uneven contest. The USA media which has been entirely Leonardo Decaprionised so 90% is fluffy news items of young, almost pre pubescent girls, taking selfies of their arses in provocative positions. Why even the non left the middle class tabloids like the Mail do it all the time.

So against that background so called scientists with an agenda can proclaim any tosh they want there is only a handful of people who speak up against the spin.


We always hear that record cold, record heat, severe droughts, severe floods, melt sea is, expanding sea ice and so on are manifestations of *MAN* made global warming. The penny is dropping big time, that the temperature data which is in the hands of people like Gavin Schmidt who refused to debate the issue or be in the same studio as Dr Roy Spencer; is being heavily stretched and spun as temperatures despite the increase in C02 has failed to rise.

So the tripe that Dawlish just itches to present is hold hat and has a massive cloud shaped like a question mark hanging over it. Its hardly brave contradiction of the 'consensus', is it.

Idiot.

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:55:21 -0700, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

tripe

Ionc (pronounced 'yonk' (ask Tudor)).

In article ,
says...

Idiot.

Was that offensive and highly discriminatory or highly offensive and
normally discriminatory? Was it derogatory in any way? How do you think
the idiot feels to be constantly labeled as such by people who should
know, and indeed do preach, better?

You can add those questions on to the list of outstanding questions that
I know you will get around to answering soon.

Thank you for snipping. It is appreciated.

--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.