On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:01:07 AM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

========

Like 'potentially'.

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+1, Stephen Davenport wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:01:07 AM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

========

Like 'potentially'.

Beat me to it, but you missed "if".

On Thursday, 24 September 2015 21:38:17 UTC+1, xmetman wrote:
On Thursday, 24 September 2015 20:03:39 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
Dry in most areas and potentially warmer than average in the daytime on 4th Oct. If skies clear, cool nights. A very nice end to Sept, start to Oct and extending to the middle of the first week.

what we call in the trade an indian summer...

Saunton Sands *could* be in for its finest weather of the year

--

------------------------------
This email was sent by a company owned by Pearson plc, registered office at
80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL. Registered in England and Wales with company
number 53723.

On Sunday, 27 September 2015 00:14:12 UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote:
On 25/09/2015 18:27, xmetman wrote:
On Friday, 25 September 2015 17:55:16 UTC+1, wrote:
On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 1:08:12 PM UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote:
On 24/09/2015 22:05, Joe Egginton wrote:
On 24/09/2015 20:03, Dawlish wrote:
Dry in most areas and potentially warmer than average in the daytime
on 4th Oct. If skies clear, cool nights. A very nice end to Sept,
start to Oct and extending to the middle of the first week.


The Idiot Is Back!

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
----------------------------------------
Don't be so hard on yourself!

I like the way he had to later clarify it was Dawlish he was talking about. it would be an easy mistake to make that he was talking about himself

Col

Getting back to the anticyclonic easterlies...

The pattern for the 29th of September is almost unique as far as I can see if today's GFS is correct at T+96, with a high in the central North sea (1041 hPa) and a deepening low (975 hPa) SW of Iceland.

I've checked the Lamb Weather Types for some form of analog for this type of situation for the end of September without any luck. The central north Atlantic (45N 25W) were the negative SST anomalies are lie under the influence of high pressure as well.

-----------------------------------------------------------------I
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.
Dave

Are you saying this general pattern could persist for months?

--

------------------------------
This email was sent by a company owned by Pearson plc, registered office at
80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL. Registered in England and Wales with company
number 53723.

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+1, Stephen Davenport wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:01:07 AM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

========

Like 'potentially'.

Nothing meant in a negative way there, wannabe vultures. You must learn to distinguish when I criticise hubris and hypocrisy, or you'll miss your mark. If I do criticise it; you'll know.

'Could' in science, is just a great word. means absolutely anything.

On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 12:43:48 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+1, Stephen Davenport wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:01:07 AM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

========

Like 'potentially'.

Nothing meant in a negative way there, wannabe vultures. You must learn to distinguish when I criticise hubris and hypocrisy, or you'll miss your mark. If I do criticise it; you'll know.

'Could' in science, is just a great word. means absolutely anything.

One rule for one..........and a shame you can't recognise hypocrisy.
A long period of absence from posting, yet one of your first posts is a piece of nit picking childishness. Nothing changes.

On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 2:16:34 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 12:43:48 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+1, Stephen Davenport wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:01:07 AM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

========

Like 'potentially'.

Nothing meant in a negative way there, wannabe vultures. You must learn to distinguish when I criticise hubris and hypocrisy, or you'll miss your mark. If I do criticise it; you'll know.

'Could' in science, is just a great word. means absolutely anything.

One rule for one..........and a shame you can't recognise hypocrisy.
A long period of absence from posting, yet one of your first posts is a piece of nit picking childishness. Nothing changes.

Yawn. You got it wrong again, but won't recognise it. As always, I'm the main reason you post here. That fact has been very clear over the past month. Looking back, your very few posts included a decent percentage simply about me. Weird and obsessive, when I don't post. As you say, nothing changes.

Of course I'll post as and when I want and not seek permission from you, mitchell, though as always, you'll dig your hole deeper with your reply.

On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 3:41:30 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:

Yawn. You got it wrong again, but won't recognise it. As always, I'm the main reason you post here. That fact has been very clear over the past month. Looking back, your very few posts included a decent percentage simply about me. Weird and obsessive, when I don't post. As you say, nothing changes..

Of course I'll post as and when I want and not seek permission from you, mitchell, though as always, you'll dig your hole deeper with your reply.

I think you have rather missed the point. You took a sarcastic swipe towards Will for using the word 'could' but you yourself used the word 'potentially' in your own forecast which means much the same thing.
To be honest the use of both words is very sensible at those ranges.

Col

On Monday, 28 September 2015 15:41:30 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 2:16:34 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 12:43:48 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+1, Stephen Davenport wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:01:07 AM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

========

Like 'potentially'.

Nothing meant in a negative way there, wannabe vultures. You must learn to distinguish when I criticise hubris and hypocrisy, or you'll miss your mark. If I do criticise it; you'll know.

'Could' in science, is just a great word. means absolutely anything.

One rule for one..........and a shame you can't recognise hypocrisy.
A long period of absence from posting, yet one of your first posts is a piece of nit picking childishness. Nothing changes.

Yawn. You got it wrong again, but won't recognise it. As always, I'm the main reason you post here. That fact has been very clear over the past month. Looking back, your very few posts included a decent percentage simply about me. Weird and obsessive, when I don't post. As you say, nothing changes..

Of course I'll post as and when I want and not seek permission from you, mitchell, though as always, you'll dig your hole deeper with your reply.

Here we go again. As soon as you're back there's trouble. There was none while you were away, none at all, as you can verify.

Since when has David Mitchell assumed he could grant you permission to post and since when have you sought permission from him or anyone else on this group? Answer to both - never. You just make things up as an expression of your crushing inferiority complex.

If David Mitchell and many others, including me, have made postings solely about you it is because we are simply not prepared to be the subject of the snide remarks, insults and false accusations that you indulge in and will say so in our various ways.

The idea that some people post here simply because of your presence shows ludicrous self-importance. The opposite is true; people have left this group because of you. You should cover your face in shame but you know no such sentiment.

Now go and plaster your deficiencies over some other group, God help them. Just *not* this one. You're not really one of us, are you, Paul? Well then, **** off.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.