On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 08:21:25 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 10:17:16 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 20:19:06 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 7:31:25 PM UTC, wrote:
On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 7:08:47 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:



Really . I must have imagined it Col. Darn the pesky voices.


I meant people on here.

Col

larry also believes the Daily Expressive when it quotes Madden's idiocy too. Hacks will *always* make more than they should out of any situation and all 4 google search links are hacks' opinion. The *fact* remains, which larry wants to try to deny, is that this storm was the strongest Pacific hurricane to affect the Americas. The likelihood of reasons why will come to light in research, probably later this year. That likelihood is that a warming earth (combined with an El Nino) will produce more intense hurricanes.. The 4 hacks have used this speculation to write their reports and larry believes it is science and attempts to criticise science on this basis. I know. It's mad. He does this because larry has a far right-wing agenda to deny AGW and all the avalanche of science that accompanies the research. larry doesn't wish to admit that this hurricane was so strong, because he's still hanging on to the non-existent 'pause' in GW and thus how can such strong hurricanes be being spawned when they weren't 20 years ago.

His clear agenda is to constantly deny that this warming is most likely to be caused by humans. That involves closing his eyes and ears to anything which shows the opposite. That's why he is a climate denier and that's why he is an idiot.

Your a prize ****....... you vile lying hypocrite you.......shut yer big fat gob.......you flipping lying yellow fraud.

The usual resort to foulness when under pressure. Can't use apostrophe's; can't help posting idiocy.



I'm not under pressure you fool, I'm just telling you what your are, a hypocrite and coward, they do constitute foul language anymore than saying the sky is blue on a clear day. Just a fact.

On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:57:24 PM UTC, wrote:
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:21:25 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:


Can't use apostrophe's;

LOL!

Col

Done to see if larry could possibly spot it. He couldn't, of course. 😂

On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 1:35:04 PM UTC-4, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:


http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...ia-damp-squib/


However moving on to the actual science. Stephen did you actually watch this


http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutsshws.php

Scott criticised me for not getting my fact from NOAA , well here they are .

Lives being saved by pre warning yes, but so little damage to wooden structure and trees with a cat5 ? Yeah right.

=========

"Moving on to the actual science" is a surprising change. And, yes, I'm very familiar with the Saffir-Simpson Scale, thanks. The scale is set by measured wind speeds and describes *potential* damage of each category. Tornado strength is categorized post-hoc by the damage caused; hurricane strength is not. It is a fact that Patricia was the strongest hurricane on record in the region.

Given this sudden interest in science then the link to an actual scientist's article should be more pertinent than the drivel leaking from a snivelling ignoramus like James Delingpole.

Here is some more simple science:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...killed-no-one/

http://www.weather.com/storms/hurric...a-mexico-coast


Stephen.