Hilarious. Do continue mitchell. The depths of your obsession with me are becoming legendary. laughing

in 428986 20160101 112041 Joe Egginton wrote:


I agree Col, this newsgroup as become most acrimonious.



"Has", not "as".

On 02/01/2016 07:38, Bob Martin wrote:
in 428986 20160101 112041 Joe Egginton wrote:


I agree Col, this newsgroup as become most acrimonious.



"Has", not "as".


Another one that's pedantic, what's your beef? It's readable and
understandable.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 7:11:53 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Hilarious. Do continue mitchell. The depths of your obsession with me are becoming legendary. laughing

There is no obsession other than in your head. This is just normal Dawlish diversionary behaviour which is intended to deflect from the main point, i.e. your continual ability to answer a question.

You will have long since forgotten, but this one was about how you are able to justify criticism of others, when you are equally guilty of poisonous posts against the person?

Of course the answer is that you can't, there is no justification and you are equally venomous.

Although your laughing has returned, you seem to be forgetting to include all those pointless punctuation marks in your posts.

Just a little reminder. *)

On Saturday, 2 January 2016 07:04:54 UTC, Col wrote:
On 02/01/2016 02:21, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 1 January 2016 11:20:34 UTC, jumper wrote:


I agree Col, this newsgroup as become most acrimonious.


Well, it was your post that started it (a reply to Weatherlawyer) and you have a lot to answer for. Of course the shemozzle was made much worse, as ever, by the Bishop of Dawlish, who spied an opening for him to practise his venom-spitting while simultaneously adjusting his halo. That reaction can be "safely ignored" as The Bish would say. But there's no excuse for your words in a group like this. Keep them for yacking to your mates, or whatever. Then you complain about the group becoming acrimonious which shows a level of self-awareness comparable to that of a bin-liner. Never mind the sodding Bishop - none of us like racist stuff. You are so selfish..

That's exactly the reply he was trolling for!

--
Col

Who? You replied to jumper yourself, quite rightly, too. Or did you mean St Paul's Twenty-thousandth Letter To The Weather Groups? Plenty have had their say on that junk mail, but to little effect.
I dunno, this group is doin' my 'ead in.

Tudor Hughes.

On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:18:34 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 2 January 2016 07:04:54 UTC, Col wrote:
On 02/01/2016 02:21, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 1 January 2016 11:20:34 UTC, jumper wrote:


I agree Col, this newsgroup as become most acrimonious.


Well, it was your post that started it (a reply to Weatherlawyer) and you have a lot to answer for. Of course the shemozzle was made much worse, as ever, by the Bishop of Dawlish, who spied an opening for him to practise his venom-spitting while simultaneously adjusting his halo. That reaction can be "safely ignored" as The Bish would say. But there's no excuse for your words in a group like this. Keep them for yacking to your mates, or whatever. Then you complain about the group becoming acrimonious which shows a level of self-awareness comparable to that of a bin-liner. Never mind the sodding Bishop - none of us like racist stuff. You are so selfish.

That's exactly the reply he was trolling for!

--
Col

Who? You replied to jumper yourself, quite rightly, too. Or did you mean St Paul's Twenty-thousandth Letter To The Weather Groups? Plenty have had their say on that junk mail, but to little effect.
I dunno, this group is doin' my 'ead in.

Tudor Hughes.

Oh marvellous! hughes tries to bring me into it, as always, using my condemnation of the racist to attempt his usual weak attempt at having a go at me.. Just hilarious.

Hasn't worked, yet again, hughes, has it?

On Saturday, 2 January 2016 16:53:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:18:34 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 2 January 2016 07:04:54 UTC, Col wrote:
On 02/01/2016 02:21, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 1 January 2016 11:20:34 UTC, jumper wrote:


I agree Col, this newsgroup as become most acrimonious.


Well, it was your post that started it (a reply to Weatherlawyer) and you have a lot to answer for. Of course the shemozzle was made much worse, as ever, by the Bishop of Dawlish, who spied an opening for him to practise his venom-spitting while simultaneously adjusting his halo. That reaction can be "safely ignored" as The Bish would say. But there's no excuse for your words in a group like this. Keep them for yacking to your mates, or whatever. Then you complain about the group becoming acrimonious which shows a level of self-awareness comparable to that of a bin-liner. Never mind the sodding Bishop - none of us like racist stuff. You are so selfish.

That's exactly the reply he was trolling for!

--
Col

Who? You replied to jumper yourself, quite rightly, too. Or did you mean St Paul's Twenty-thousandth Letter To The Weather Groups? Plenty have had their say on that junk mail, but to little effect.
I dunno, this group is doin' my 'ead in.

Tudor Hughes.

Oh marvellous! hughes tries to bring me into it, as always, using my condemnation of the racist to attempt his usual weak attempt at having a go at me. Just hilarious.

Hasn't worked, yet again, hughes, has it?

You go way over the top with you condemnation of all those so called racist under the bed precisely because you feel it puts you in the 'good guy ' category but most realise that you are not a 'good guy' in ten thousand years and if fact you give vehement anti racist a bad name.

The best part of humanity is the ability for , warmth, kindness, friendship and principled support; all the attributes you sadly seem to hide well away .

You also take the condemnation and definition of the term 'racists ' to absurd lengths. I'd rather condemn poor behaviour however to mock someone for their race or colour is just as bad as setting out to humiliate an individual for the purposes of imagined ingratiation with the sole purpose of crushing a persons confidence and trying to invalidate their opinion.


That's why your so called championing of the burning at the stake of anyone who you deem to be racist as a total hollow ring to it considering your personality as expressed over the years.

On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 7:38:17 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 2 January 2016 16:53:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:18:34 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 2 January 2016 07:04:54 UTC, Col wrote:
On 02/01/2016 02:21, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 1 January 2016 11:20:34 UTC, jumper wrote:


I agree Col, this newsgroup as become most acrimonious.


Well, it was your post that started it (a reply to Weatherlawyer) and you have a lot to answer for. Of course the shemozzle was made much worse, as ever, by the Bishop of Dawlish, who spied an opening for him to practise his venom-spitting while simultaneously adjusting his halo. That reaction can be "safely ignored" as The Bish would say. But there's no excuse for your words in a group like this. Keep them for yacking to your mates, or whatever. Then you complain about the group becoming acrimonious which shows a level of self-awareness comparable to that of a bin-liner. Never mind the sodding Bishop - none of us like racist stuff. You are so selfish.

That's exactly the reply he was trolling for!

--
Col

Who? You replied to jumper yourself, quite rightly, too. Or did you mean St Paul's Twenty-thousandth Letter To The Weather Groups? Plenty have had their say on that junk mail, but to little effect.
I dunno, this group is doin' my 'ead in.

Tudor Hughes.

Oh marvellous! hughes tries to bring me into it, as always, using my condemnation of the racist to attempt his usual weak attempt at having a go at me. Just hilarious.

Hasn't worked, yet again, hughes, has it?

You go way over the top with you condemnation of all those so called racist...

No I condemn the board racist. Why do you support it?

On Saturday, 2 January 2016 16:53:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:18:34 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 2 January 2016 07:04:54 UTC, Col wrote:
On 02/01/2016 02:21, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Friday, 1 January 2016 11:20:34 UTC, jumper wrote:


I agree Col, this newsgroup as become most acrimonious.


Well, it was your post that started it (a reply to Weatherlawyer) and you have a lot to answer for. Of course the shemozzle was made much worse, as ever, by the Bishop of Dawlish, who spied an opening for him to practise his venom-spitting while simultaneously adjusting his halo. That reaction can be "safely ignored" as The Bish would say. But there's no excuse for your words in a group like this. Keep them for yacking to your mates, or whatever. Then you complain about the group becoming acrimonious which shows a level of self-awareness comparable to that of a bin-liner. Never mind the sodding Bishop - none of us like racist stuff. You are so selfish.

That's exactly the reply he was trolling for!

--
Col

Who? You replied to jumper yourself, quite rightly, too. Or did you mean St Paul's Twenty-thousandth Letter To The Weather Groups? Plenty have had their say on that junk mail, but to little effect.
I dunno, this group is doin' my 'ead in.

Tudor Hughes.

Oh marvellous! hughes tries to bring me into it, as always, using my condemnation of the racist to attempt his usual weak attempt at having a go at me. Just hilarious.

Hasn't worked, yet again, hughes, has it?

You were quite unnecessarily pedantic and bossy about Stephen Davenport's post and its commas yet you commit a far more egregious error by spelling my name and that of others with a small letter. Obviously your grammatical standards are subject to considerable variability, dependent on El Nino, maybe, or the fortunes of Crewe Alexandra. Who knows? It's a mystery!

Tudor Hughes.

On 02/01/2016 16:18, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 2 January 2016 07:04:54 UTC, Col wrote:


That's exactly the reply he was trolling for!

--
Col

Who? You replied to jumper yourself, quite rightly, too. Or did you mean St Paul's Twenty-thousandth Letter To The Weather Groups? Plenty have had their say on that junk mail, but to little effect.
I dunno, this group is doin' my 'ead in

He wanted someone to pick him up for hypocrisy. He knows full well he is
responsible for some of the acrimony here.

It was an obvious troll!

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg