On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 8:00:35 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 10:39:18 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 9:45:21 AM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 9:07:10 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Aussie BOM suggests that this event is one of the top 3 in terms of strength, in the last 50 years.

http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/enso/

So the question the climate deniers need to consider is: if this event is not the strongest event (1997-8 certainly appears stronger), why are global temperatures presently so much warmer than in these past El Ninos?

An underlying global warming trend, perhaps, lifting the bad temperatures? After that is accepted (which almost everyone does, we only need to sort out the cause, which every nation in Paris, every national scientific institution on earth and almost every climate scientist on the planet agree is Anthropogenic CO2.

Deniers? Any comment?

Other than grammar, only one. After yesterday's generous donation of commas, I have included a ) for you, as you seem to have lost one. In fact here are a few more, in case you find yourself in a similar predicament.
)))))))), oh go on then, (((((.

Idiot. (Actually, completely obsessed idiot). Now try talking about ENSO beyond you

You can ask him to talk about ENSO when you start talking about Stephen Davenport's American trip. Your entire response was about commas and you showed no respect to a decent meteorologist and largely destroyed the thread as you have done so many times. You are using meteorology to project your own ego but ironically you seem to have chosen the wrong subject because your knowledge level is much lower than you'd like us to think. It barely exists. Your recent thread about SSW's was almost embarrassing in its naivety. You shoot yourself in the foot every time you tap the keyboard - don't think people don't notice.

Tudor Hughes

Yawn. laughing