Hahahaha. Im in almost every post of this nutcase now. It's just hilarious. 😂😂😂😂😂

I honestly think he dreams about me. 😂😂😂😂😂

On Monday, 1 February 2016 19:45:05 UTC, dawlish wrote:
Hahahaha. Im Hahahaha. in Hahahaha. almost Hahahaha. every Hahahaha. post Hahahaha. of Hahahaha. this Hahahaha. nutcase Hahahaha. now Hahahaha. . It's Hahahaha. just Hahahaha. hilarious. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha.

I Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. honestly Hahahaha. think Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. he Hahahaha. dreams Hahahaha. about Hahahaha. me. Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha. 😂 Hahahaha.

Hahahaha. I split my side this Hahahaha. boy makes me smile every time all the while Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. The empty head I'll miss him surely when he's dead?
I love to troll a wondering how to spell out smile, then dawlish simple comes along and Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. hohohoheehee "When I'm dead or so he said I'll hurry up and see."

On Sunday, 31 January 2016 17:06:52 UTC, Keith (Southend)G wrote:
At what height does the stratosphere start? Going by this table would it
be 226hPa?
http://weatherfaqs.org.uk/book/export/html/174
--
Keith (Southend)
"Weather Home & Abroad"
http://www.southendweather.net
Twitter:@SS9Weatherman

The WMO definition, according to Wikipaedia, is that point where the lapse rate becomes lower than 2 degC/km *provided* the average lapse rate above that point is less than 2 degC/km. So it could be almost any height. It seems less well-defined in the tropics and also in the coldest regions of Siberia, say, in the winter. I have seen a few ascents that have been not far off isothermal throughout at about -45°C. You could make a good case for saying the tropopause had descended to the surface or that it didn't exist in any meaningful way.

Tudor Hughes.

On Monday, 1 February 2016 22:10:56 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Sunday, 31 January 2016 17:06:52 UTC, Keith (Southend)G wrote:
At what height does the stratosphere start? Going by this table would it
be 226hPa?
http://weatherfaqs.org.uk/book/export/html/174
--
Keith (Southend)
"Weather Home & Abroad"
http://www.southendweather.net
Twitter:@SS9Weatherman

The WMO definition, according to Wikipaedia, is that point where the lapse rate becomes lower than 2 degC/km *provided* the average lapse rate above that point is less than 2 degC/km. So it could be almost any height. It seems less well-defined in the tropics and also in the coldest regions of Siberia, say, in the winter. I have seen a few ascents that have been not far off isothermal throughout at about -45°C. You could make a good case for saying the tropopause had descended to the surface or that it didn't exist in any meaningful way.

I read thatpardon?
Is this another form of the English language you are experimenting with?

On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:58:20 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Monday, 1 February 2016 22:10:56 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Sunday, 31 January 2016 17:06:52 UTC, Keith (Southend)G wrote:
At what height does the stratosphere start? Going by this table would it
be 226hPa?
http://weatherfaqs.org.uk/book/export/html/174
--
Keith (Southend)
"Weather Home & Abroad"
http://www.southendweather.net
Twitter:@SS9Weatherman

The WMO definition, according to Wikipaedia, is that point where the lapse rate becomes lower than 2 degC/km *provided* the average lapse rate above that point is less than 2 degC/km. So it could be almost any height. It seems less well-defined in the tropics and also in the coldest regions of Siberia, say, in the winter. I have seen a few ascents that have been not far off isothermal throughout at about -45°C. You could make a good case for saying the tropopause had descended to the surface or that it didn't exist in any meaningful way.

I read thatpardon?
Is this another form of the English language you are experimenting with?

Do you know that's the first comment you've made that I've actually understood. Well, the second sentence, anyway. Can't make head or tail of the first one. Not to worry.

Tudor Hughes

On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 04:36:19 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:58:20 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Monday, 1 February 2016 22:10:56 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Sunday, 31 January 2016 17:06:52 UTC, Keith (Southend)G wrote:

At what height does the stratosphere start? Going by this table would
it be 226hPa?
http://weatherfaqs.org.uk/book/export/html/174

If the link isn't climatological statisticification then it must be designed to allow pilots avoid turbulence as Jet engines are designed to run cool and high. Do you suspect there is interesting amounts of vortex shedding at 226hPa?
I must confess it never occurred to me until your post.

"Weather Home & Abroad"
http://www.southendweather.net
Twitter:@SS9Weatherman

The WMO definition, according to Wikipaedia, is that point where the lapse rate becomes lower than 2 degC/km *provided* the average lapse rate above that point is less than 2 degC/km. So it could be almost any height. It seems less well-defined in the tropics and also in the coldest regions of Siberia, say, in the winter. I have seen a few ascents that have been not far off isothermal throughout at about -45°C. You could make a good case for saying the tropopause had descended to the surface or that it didn't exist in any meaningful way.

I read thatpardon?
Is this another form of the English language you are experimenting with?

Do you know that's the first comment you've made that I've actually understood. Well, the second sentence, anyway. Can't make head or tail of the first one. Not to worry.

Tudor Hughes

I take that you are not gifted at nuances?
I used to use the blunt instrument approach too. Too often I think. Now I think too often.

Yup. It was a flounce...........

No-one ever announces they are leaving and leaves. Ever.

On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 11:44:26 UTC, dawlish wrote:
hahahahahaha hahahahahahaha hahahahahaha hahahahahahaha hahahahahaha
hahahahahaha hahahahahaha hahahahahahaha hahahahahaha hahahahahahaha

Picture Dawlish winning:

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...0-selfie-prize

The stupidest woman in Wales is probably English, her horse is certainly dawlish

In your dreams, W, I sleep with you. In actuality (and again) I'm so far under your skin I can carve my initials in your bones.

All I can do is say 'I told you so' and enjoy laughing at your expense. I never realised one poke of your gobbledygook could be so entertaining. I'll probably leave you alone again, for a long time, soon. Or maybe not.��