On 11/03/2016 22:06, Jumper wrote:
On 11/03/2016 17:17, Alastair wrote:
On Friday, 11 March 2016 12:43:57 UTC, Keith (Southend)G wrote:

What ever is agreed surely with the third world econmies growing like
they are we haven't got a hope in hell of reducing Co2 levels. Thatr's
not to say we are ALL to blame as we all like using are phones and
computers and cars.

Whatever you believe we will all pay in the end.

Even if the third world economies were not growing, do you really
think that we would reduce our emissions? We are still trying to grow
our economy. Even the new left wing leadership in the Labour Party are
advocating that. Expand the economy and you have more cars on the road
and more carbon emissions.

Until the scientists realise the disaster we are all facing, e.g. half
the global population dying of starvation, and warn the public of the
dangers, then that disaster is inevitable.

But some, even here, are peddling complacency and apathy. No wonder
the politicians and public can't see the catastrophe ahead. When they
do wake up to the dangers it will be too late!


World oil would've run out by the middle of this century so with no oil
driven vehicles, boats, trains or planes it should give the planet to
recover.

You know after this sentence I was actually surprised to see you saying
something sensible for once.

Unless humanity is so stoopid that it replaces oil driven
vehicles, boats, and trains by steam driven vehicles, boats, and trains
run by coal.

Then I read this sentence. Oh dear oh dear oh dear....
Nornal service is resumed!
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Alastair wrote:

Until the scientists realise the disaster we are all facing, e.g. half the
global population dying of starvation


That's about as ridiculous a statement as suggesting a nuclear war would
solve the problem. It would greatly reduce the human population and block
out the sun allowing the ice to reform.


--
Brian Wakem
Lower Bourne, Farnham, Surrey
http://www.brianwakem.co.uk/weather

Idiots thrive on denials. Three on the same thread talking stupidity. Pretty hilarious. 😀😀😀😀😀

On Friday, 11 March 2016 21:21:55 UTC, Alastair wrote:
On Friday, 11 March 2016 17:42:11 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Friday, 11 March 2016 12:43:57 UTC, Keith (Southend)G wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-en...e=news_central

What ever is agreed surely with the third world econmies growing like
they are we haven't got a hope in hell of reducing Co2 levels. Thatr's
not to say we are ALL to blame as we all like using are phones and
computers and cars.

Whatever you believe we will all pay in the end.
--
Keith (Southend)
"Weather Home & Abroad"
http://www.southendweather.net
Twitter:@SS9Weatherman

Good the plants love it.

Lawrence,

Didn't you know that plants do not grow on ice sheets? Nor would those living on the Somerset Levels or the Fens appreciate a sea level rise of 12 m..

Sea level rise is all within the 2-3mm every year since the last ice age , it is always in a state of rising or lowering. The climate will cool again and we will be in another disastrous dry frigid world once again for 90 odd thousand years and zillions of plants will die. Thankfully we are still in a warms interglacial which will one day reach a point where we enter a disastrous period once again of glaciation.


I'd prefer to live in this time that any other period of earths history

On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 4:08:39 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:


Sea level rise is all within the 2-3mm every year since the last ice age


"Core samples, tide gauge readings, and, most recently, satellite measurements tell us that over the past century, the Global Mean Sea Level (GMSL) has risen by 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 centimeters). However, the annual rate of rise over the past 20 years has been 0.13 inches (3.2 millimeters) a year, roughly twice the average speed of the preceding 80 years."

That is 6.4 cm in the last 20 year. If that continue to double add 12.8 cm upto 2035, and add 25.6 upto 2055 plus 50 cm up to 2075 plus a 1m for 2075 to 2095. That makes 2m by 2100, so long as there is no sudden collapse of the Greenland ice sheet.

We may be safe but what about our grandchildren? Have you no conscience?

On Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:49:58 UTC, Paul Garvey wrote:

Idiots thrive on denials. Three on the same thread talking stupidity. Pretty hilarious. 😀😀😀😀😀

Mrs Garvey's boy does cut and paste as thinking time is such a waste. Such he says is better spent than filtering through my wet cement.

When asked about the Atlantic he said who knows I'm much to thick? I'll open up my drawer of socks and ask them all about its blocks.

Talk to the hand began his glove he may know what's spoken of. This idiot data as you see is far beyond the likes of me. I only know it's getting warm, it's all I know when said and done. I post about it when I'm me and then again in puppetry.

I'm not the only one to care, despite the fact I'm not all there. I reprimand all those who don't and laughs hahaha@ll who won't.

So there we have what's going on, at sea with Mrs Garvey's son.

Idiot. Thank goodness you are in charge of.............nothing and you have no influence on.............anything.

On Sunday, 13 March 2016 19:09:00 UTC, Paul Garvey wrote:
Idiot. Thank goodness you are in charge of.............nothing and you have no influence on.............anything.

You can shut your face you are the biggest slimiest hypocrite of all. Always highlighting AGW as if you are some sort of expert. Typical lefty Garvey with the say as I say and not as I do crap that pours out of all lefty gobs.. If I were to think for one minute that we were all in danger from the human 80 ppm of co2 then I would put my money where mu mouth is unlike you.