On 21/05/2016 18:43, Desperate Dan wrote:
Nothing like a bit of leftie internecine banter in a newsgroup (which used to be a good, interesting newsgroup until the warmist nutters infected it), is there, Dullish?

Can anyone please explain to me the logic behind anyone disagreeing with anything Weatherlawyer, Jumper, Lawrence et al say, immediately bocomes a "leftie". Define a leftie while you're at it.


The same goes for the word 'liberal' which gets bandied around as if
it's a term of abuse.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 12:27:31 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 06:15:34 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

My post, to which you replied, was a fairly mild suggestion to Ron Button (not you, Ron Button) as to how to deal with Weatherlawyer and you have jumped down my throat on a matter that doesn't even involve you. Why? Bloody obvious why. You saw the words "nasty" and "personal" and immediately thought "he means me". Too right he does, matey, but he doesn't state it. He relies on your guilt complex to confirm that you are aware of the prevailing sentiment but too arrogant to do anything about it or to admit it directly.
As to foul language it has been pointed out further down this thread that you have an ability to be extremely unpleasant without resorting to effing and blinding, a misogynistic talent, and are conflating the two. And how can you drive a car without using the C-word occasionally? I can't.. It gets really difficult if there's somebody else in the car, quite apart from not being able to fart properly.
You need to evolve into an adult and acquire some self-confidence and a sense of humour. Then you may see yourself as others see you.

Tudor Hughes.

On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 12:27:31 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 06:15:34 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

My post, to which you replied, was a fairly mild suggestion to Ron Button (not you, Ron Button) as to how to deal with Weatherlawyer and you have jumped down my throat on a matter that doesn't even involve you. Why? Bloody obvious why. You saw the words "nasty" and "personal" and immediately thought "he means me". Too right he does, matey, but he doesn't state it. He relies on your guilt complex to confirm that you are aware of the prevailing sentiment but too arrogant to do anything about it or to admit it directly.
As to foul language it has been pointed out further down this thread that you have an ability to be extremely unpleasant without resorting to effing and blinding, a misogynistic talent, and are conflating the two. And how can you drive a car without using the C-word occasionally? I can't.. It gets really difficult if there's somebody else in the car, quite apart from not being able to fart properly.
You need to evolve into an adult and acquire some self-confidence and a sense of humour. Then you may see yourself as others see you.

Tudor Hughes.

Oh that is priceless! As I've said so many times, you feel that any response, containing whatever foulness you wish to writeis perfectly justifiable in response to someone you personally don't like,

On Thursday, 19 May 2016 05:52:22 UTC+12, Col wrote:
On 18/05/2016 18:45, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?


Congratulations, you've just given him yet another thread to latch onto.
Just killfile him and be done with it.


--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

It's very tempting to permanently cut out a load of vapid drivel, but I can't be bothered doing the research to find out how.

On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 7:08:18 AM UTC+1, wrote:
On Thursday, 19 May 2016 05:52:22 UTC+12, Col wrote:
On 18/05/2016 18:45, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?


Congratulations, you've just given him yet another thread to latch onto..
Just killfile him and be done with it.


--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

It's very tempting to permanently cut out a load of vapid drivel, but I can't be bothered doing the research to find out how.

I have in the past. It takes time and effort. Then I've monitored his usually unintelligible output. Cutting through the gobbledygook to find actual forecasts is very difficult - which is why no-one else has bothered, that I know of. It points to his ideas being useless. W hates that, hence the nasty, personal abuse that he dishes out and the stalking.

hughes lies about this, of course. But then again, hughes feels that W's comments are perfectly OK, as hughes doesn't personally like me. 'My enemy's enemy is my friend' s fine way to operate.

In article ,
says...
It's very tempting to permanently cut out a load of vapid drivel, but I can't be bothered doing the research to find out how.

I have in the past. It takes time and effort. Then I've monitored his usually unintelligible output.


I think rupert is refering to a killfile, which makes your response
rather amusing.

--
Alan LeHun

On Monday, 23 May 2016 11:55:40 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
It's very tempting to permanently cut out a load of vapid drivel, but I can't be bothered doing the research to find out how.

I have in the past. It takes time and effort. Then I've monitored his usually unintelligible output.


I think rupert is refering to a killfile, which makes your response
rather amusing.

Thanks for appending this as I didn't particularly want to reply to a troll.. The fact is that my long lists of responding to my own posts is down to being killfiled on so may scientist's computers. The only one to respond to my post after the Sinabung eruption was Dawlish.

He asked me a question in the usual empty headed way and I responded thus: "I will answer all your questions if you will answer one for me."

dagshish: "No. I'll just monitor whatever forecasts you make that appear intelligible. OK? Well, if its not, you have no choice. I'll do it anyway. [He seems to enjoy stabbing himself all over with a well armed locust with many pains. 1 Timothy 6:10]

This one he '...there is a slim chance of a large earthquake tomorrow' isn't a forecast, it's a piece of hopefulness, based on the fact that it could happen anyway, but that needs pointing out and that needed to be exposed.

Actually, that's been the case in all your forecasts. They've all been hopeful, as your methods clearly don't work. Goodbye until the next one it's possible to decipher."

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...er/CiQiLapsihs

..there is a slim chance of a large earthquake tomorrow' isn't a forecast,

If that isn't a forecast it explains why dag never makes them . He has no idea what a forecast is. Instead of responding to a troll with violence it is an easy matter to chase it away with a suitable intelligent question.

Something the flowerpotmen on here might learn from: Thinking long enough about what you think you know may be painful initially but if you are more creditable than a wet sheep you will get a taste for asking intelligent questions.

The alternative is to create bigger and less credible lies.
Feel free to comment there if you like, it is the whole idea of the forum after all. Not killfiles. I recall a story about the man who first submitted a paper on light waves interrupting the second man to see such things:

"Yes he is right" he said upsetting the real scientists there, for he had only been allowed into their hallowed hall on condition he remained silent: "For I have seen them!"

So much for the Royal Society of antisocialists. The thing is; we obviously don't need them.

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 21:38:42 UTC+1, wrote:
"Ron Button" wrote in message
...
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup to
spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too daily
?

Killfile?
You won't see anything then.

Will
--
" Some sects believe that the world was created 5000 years ago. Another sect
believes that it was created in 1910 "
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------
LOL