On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 18:07:47 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 1:43:14 PM UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 09:58:05 UTC+1, Col wrote:
Eskimo Will wrote:
"Richard Dixon" wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 19:09:13 UTC+1, Sir Jim Cannon wrote:
In line with the Gaffers bruv I recon were better off staying IN!
The Gaffer is actualy keener than Jez, simply reason being that it
has changed London for the BETTER in spite of what some on hear
tell us!!!

It's not often I actually agree with Piers.


Well I have already voted LEAVE as I am fed up with Merkel murk from
the east, and now Cameron clag, Piers voting Remain is another good
reason to get out :-)

I will vote remain and in the interests of balance I am tired of Farage
fogging
the issues and of Boris's bluster
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Well if you and many think this is bluster then god help us all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViPm0GUxw-M



Unlike all those that willingly took up their euro mp positions -like the Kinnocks are both inept and if anyone is the archetypal bluster or should I say Welsh windbag then Kinnock is your man . Both he and his wife have become multi millionaires on taking up their euro jobs and almost disappearing as they rake in our cash. All the euro mps get a damned good deal with their income due to rise by 40% just after the Brexit vote.

'Farages popularity has been' - because he is a racist. He attracts fellow racists like you.

People didn't vote Farage they voted either in or either out. Get a grip.

By the way what happened to you 'the bookies are never wrong' remain forecast.

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 12:32:00 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

People voted either in or either out.

How could they do both?
Election fraud?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 13:31:16 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 12:32:00 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

People voted either in or either out.

How could they do both?
Election fraud?

The clue is in the word 'either' and not the ether you seem to delight in sniffing.

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 14:06:31 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 13:31:16 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 12:32:00 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

People voted either in or either out.

How could they do both?
Election fraud?

The clue is in the word 'either' and not the ether you seem to delight in sniffing.

which one?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 16:03:26 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 14:06:31 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 13:31:16 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 12:32:00 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

People voted either in or either out.

How could they do both?
Election fraud?

The clue is in the word 'either' and not the ether you seem to delight in sniffing.

which one?

Either.