Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any reason (does any one) suppose for the fact that nobody has considered investigating earthquakes as the instigator of seiches?
It couldn't possibly be that the people who are supposed to back scientific research (Earth's politicians) have failed miserably, every four year cycle of hedonism known as democracy (aka greedy selfishness) to do their own research into getting hold of and actually listening to advisers who are not afraid of telling the truth. And making the point of finding people with scholarly abilities, that actually know how. Take Alisdair for example. It was positively an eye opener to realise how caught up his own bubble he is. So how does one break through one's own plastic bag and get one's own head out from whichever orifice it has been inserted? The first thing to do when you have a problem is to realise that you have a problem. Then if you realise that you are in an hole you have to stop digging until you have had a chance to reflect if digging will get you out. Or is there "another way"? We live in an unfortunate age where the politics of this planet has been so appalling that most sensible people deny that there is a god. But are they right? And if there is a god, will he help? Which bring us back to the question: Have we realised there is a problem? Before considering that again: Is it not wise to consider that if we have a problem, are we even capable of considering how far we are willing to go in the measure to correct the problem? Would we rather keep the problem than accept the cure? Is there anyone in your life that you would dare to even discuss the possibility of a god with? If you can bring yourself to consider that; you might also consider the importance of that question. That you live in an age where the answer is possibly: NFW (plus or minus:!!) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 04:18:11 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Any reason (does any one) suppose for the fact that nobody has considered investigating earthquakes as the instigator of seiches? It couldn't possibly be that the people who are supposed to back scientific research (Earth's politicians) have failed miserably, every four year cycle of hedonism known as democracy (aka greedy selfishness) to do their own research into getting hold of and actually listening to advisers who are not afraid of telling the truth. And making the point of finding people with scholarly abilities, that actually know how. Take Alisdair for example. It was positively an eye opener to realise how caught up his own bubble he is. So how does one break through one's own plastic bag and get one's own head out from whichever orifice it has been inserted? The first thing to do when you have a problem is to realise that you have a problem. Then if you realise that you are in an hole you have to stop digging until you have had a chance to reflect if digging will get you out. Or is there "another way"? We live in an unfortunate age where the politics of this planet has been so appalling that most sensible people deny that there is a god. But are they right? And if there is a god, will he help? Which bring us back to the question: Have we realised there is a problem? Before considering that again: Is it not wise to consider that if we have a problem, are we even capable of considering how far we are willing to go in the measure to correct the problem? Would we rather keep the problem than accept the cure? Is there anyone in your life that you would dare to even discuss the possibility of a god with? If you can bring yourself to consider that; you might also consider the importance of that question. That you live in an age where the answer is possibly: NFW (plus or minus:!!) If the default with us is antagonism and the product of unaccountability is war and there is no god, then how is any culture to achieve a degree of comfort? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWrZDy8Si7c |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 04:48:21 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 04:18:11 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote: Any reason (does any one) suppose for the fact that nobody has considered investigating earthquakes as the instigator of seiches? It couldn't possibly be that the people who are supposed to back scientific research (Earth's politicians) have failed miserably, every four year cycle of hedonism known as democracy (aka greedy selfishness) to do their own research into getting hold of and actually listening to advisers who are not afraid of telling the truth. And making the point of finding people with scholarly abilities, that actually know how. Take Alisdair for example. It was positively an eye opener to realise how caught up his own bubble he is. So how does one break through one's own plastic bag and get one's own head out from whichever orifice it has been inserted? The first thing to do when you have a problem is to realise that you have a problem. Then if you realise that you are in an hole you have to stop digging until you have had a chance to reflect if digging will get you out. Or is there "another way"? We live in an unfortunate age where the politics of this planet has been so appalling that most sensible people deny that there is a god. But are they right? And if there is a god, will he help? Which bring us back to the question: Have we realised there is a problem? Before considering that again: Is it not wise to consider that if we have a problem, are we even capable of considering how far we are willing to go in the measure to correct the problem? Would we rather keep the problem than accept the cure? Is there anyone in your life that you would dare to even discuss the possibility of a god with? If you can bring yourself to consider that; you might also consider the importance of that question. That you live in an age where the answer is possibly: NFW (plus or minus:!!) If the default with us is antagonism and the product of unaccountability is war and there is no god, then how is any culture to achieve a degree of comfort? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWrZDy8Si7c You can not turn back the clock so going back in time to when men (and women) were not superstitious is also not possible but consider this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?annota...&v=SI6wDO2RhTQ Living in an era when after seven or eight hours of possibly boring and seldom exhausting work; how much of life would be viable if we were as cut off from one another as we have become these days. Killing an animal larger than a rabbit was a day in which the whole village engaged with one another. Keeping a fire going was another family concern. And for one man or woman the task of providing the daily bread took all day. The idea of a watchman lazing about all night on guard duty is farcical. The price of clothing we wouldn't accept for rags was tremendous, and allowing children enough free time to go to school however interesting and involving the alternative may have been impossible. the 4th (or so) video in the series refers to the snowfall of the winter in 1977/78 as being the worst in 30 years. They had got over the record heat of the summer of 1976 in complete comfort and missed the record breaking one following the test of Tzara Bomba with surprising equanimity. What really drew my attention was the thought of consternation every period in the ocean cycles when as in 2009 and 2015/16 we have had these epic tornado/volcano sequences. What I noticed most about them was the low overhanging cloud in Britain. I am sure the CET will show the regularity of that but the one annoying thing about it was the damp i-n the winter especially. I noticed that if I was cooking chips the walls would be wringing wet. At first it was just an annoyance that I had to open a window or a door for my cooking about two or three days every fortnight. While everyone was moaning about the clag, I was trying to tie it in with the strange effect the weather was producing on the North Atlantic chart. It was a relatively long time before I dropped on the derechos in North America (considering I made a concerted effort to compare the NWS Storm Reports with the Met office's North Atlantic charts.) So you see; it doesn't matter what you know, it is with whom you discuss it that makes progress possible and sadly, it is only in war-time that the powers that be, pay scientists who do research, to think outside the box. And even then the war could easily be lost in the time it takes to get rid of or burn through the dead wood at the top. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 04:48:21 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 04:18:11 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote: Any reason (does any one) suppose for the fact that nobody has considered investigating earthquakes as the instigator of seiches? It couldn't possibly be that the people who are supposed to back scientific research (Earth's politicians) have failed miserably, every four year cycle of hedonism known as democracy (aka greedy selfishness) to do their own research into getting hold of and actually listening to advisers who are not afraid of telling the truth. And making the point of finding people with scholarly abilities, that actually know how. Take Alisdair for example. It was positively an eye opener to realise how caught up his own bubble he is. So how does one break through one's own plastic bag and get one's own head out from whichever orifice it has been inserted? The first thing to do when you have a problem is to realise that you have a problem. Then if you realise that you are in an hole you have to stop digging until you have had a chance to reflect if digging will get you out. Or is there "another way"? We live in an unfortunate age where the politics of this planet has been so appalling that most sensible people deny that there is a god. But are they right? And if there is a god, will he help? Which bring us back to the question: Have we realised there is a problem? Before considering that again: Is it not wise to consider that if we have a problem, are we even capable of considering how far we are willing to go in the measure to correct the problem? Would we rather keep the problem than accept the cure? Is there anyone in your life that you would dare to even discuss the possibility of a god with? If you can bring yourself to consider that; you might also consider the importance of that question. That you live in an age where the answer is possibly: NFW (plus or minus:!!) If the default with us is antagonism and the product of unaccountability is war and there is no god, then how is any culture to achieve a degree of comfort? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWrZDy8Si7c You can not turn back the clock so going back in time to when men (and women) were not superstitious is also not possible but consider this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?annota...&v=SI6wDO2RhTQ Living in an era when after seven or eight hours of possibly boring and seldom exhausting work; how much of life would be viable if we were as cut off from one another as we have become these days. Killing an animal larger than a rabbit was a day in which the whole village engaged with one another. Keeping a fire going was another family concern. And for one man or woman the task of providing the daily bread took all day. The idea of a watchman lazing about all night on guard duty is farcical. The price of clothing we wouldn't accept for rags was tremendous, and allowing children enough free time to go to school however interesting and involving the alternative may have been impossible. the 4th (or so) video in the series refers to the snowfall of the winter in 1977/78 as being the worst in 30 years. They had got over the record heat of the summer of 1976 in complete comfort and missed the record breaking one following the test of Tzara Bomba with surprising equanimity. What really drew my attention was the thought of consternation every period in the ocean cycles when as in 2009 and 2015/16 we have had these epic tornado/volcano sequences. What I noticed most about them was the low overhanging cloud in Britain. I am sure the CET will show the regularity of that but the one annoying thing about it was the damp i-n the winter especially. I noticed that if I was cooking chips the walls would be wringing wet. At first it was just an annoyance that I had to open a window or a door for my cooking about two or three days every fortnight. While everyone was moaning about the clag, I was trying to tie it in with the strange effect the weather was producing on the North Atlantic chart. It was a relatively long time before I dropped on the derechos in North America (considering I made a concerted effort to compare the NWS Storm Reports with the Met office's North Atlantic charts.) So you see; it doesn't matter what you know, it is with whom you discuss it that makes progress possible and sadly, it is only in war-time that the powers that be, pay scientists who do research, to think outside the box. And even then the war could easily be lost in the time it takes to get rid of or burn through the dead wood at the top. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
https://youtu.be/KgUw6t3b6oE
Let me bring you songs from the group: to make you feel much better lest you stoup now. Dust you down from tip to toe. Show you how the gardens grow. Hold you steady as you go. Join the forum if you can: T'will make of you an honest man. Let me bring you from the field truth indeed as roses opened with summer rain revealed. To heal the wound and still the pain that threatens again and again as you drag down every xenaphobics lane. Life's long celebration's here. I'll toast you all in penny cheer. Let me bring you all things refined: galliards and lute songs served in chilling ale. Greetings well met fellow, hail! I am the wind to fill your sail. I am the cross to take your nail: A singer of these ageless times. With kitchen prose and gutter rhymes. Songs from the wood make you feel much better. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:01:30 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
https://youtu.be/KgUw6t3b6oE Let me bring you songs from the group: to make you feel much better lest you stoup now. Dust you down from tip to toe. Show you how the gardens grow. Hold you steady as you go. Join the forum if you can: T'will make of you an honest man. Let me bring you from the field truth indeed as roses opened with summer rain revealed. To heal the wound and still the pain that threatens again and again as you drag down every xenaphobics lane. Life's long celebration's here. I'll toast you all in penny cheer. Let me bring you all things refined: galliards and lute songs served in chilling ale. Greetings well met fellow, hail! I am the wind to fill your sail. I am the cross to take your nail: A singer of these ageless times. With kitchen prose and gutter rhymes. Songs from the wood make you feel much better. Well at least replying to yourself you're keeping this NG alive. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:58:34 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:01:30 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote: https://youtu.be/KgUw6t3b6oE Let me bring you songs from the group: to make you feel much better lest you stoup now. Dust you down from tip to toe. Show you how the gardens grow. Hold you steady as you go. Join the forum if you can: T'will make of you an honest man. Let me bring you from the field truth indeed as roses opened with summer rain revealed. To heal the wound and still the pain that threatens again and again as you drag down every xenaphobics lane. Life's long celebration's here. I'll toast you all in penny cheer. Let me bring you all things refined: galliards and lute songs served in chilling ale. Greetings well met fellow, hail! I am the wind to fill your sail. I am the cross to take your nail: A singer of these ageless times. With kitchen prose and gutter rhymes. Songs from the wood make you feel much better. Well at least replying to yourself you're keeping this NG alive. Be of good cheer stoopid is not here, lest you bide him Bid him not near with answers confiding Come knave let us end this jest, realise 'tis but for the best and at Remain's behest give no more chiding. But if I gave it to you in one lump, this Mage's ages sump you'd not partake of't readily. But with pauses to all, what thoughtful recall makes therefore of you in caution steadfastly? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
... On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:01:30 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote: snip yet more inane and anti-scientific Corbynite ramblings Well at least replying to yourself you're keeping this NG alive. Please think twice before quoting - it's so much nicer with zero reminders that WL ever existed. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:26:57 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:01:30 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote: snip yet more inane and anti-scientific Corbynite ramblings Well at least replying to yourself you're keeping this NG alive. Please think twice before quoting - it's so much nicer with zero reminders that WL ever existed. Hey John are you also on 'weather and Climate' as I can't see your name there. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 13:26:57 UTC+1, JohnD wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 11:01:30 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote: snip yet more inane and anti-scientific Corbynite ramblings Well at least replying to yourself you're keeping this NG alive. Please think twice before quoting - it's so much nicer with zero reminders that WL ever existed. Inane be the stoop John D At my bequest all see Nearer my god than thee Sailing. My unrequited love be not in peace above But on the salt sea fighting. Or deeply in the ground with hatred going round until god above does sound, fish food. Or channelled on a front like pink mice are my wont. Detained in deltas then cold-front not scanning. Nor withal: Rime. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lindzen on politics in climate science and taking greenhouse warmingseriously | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Good Science, Bad Politics (AGW) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Matt Drudge coverage of the Climate Debate and its Politics | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Fossil Fool Fhysics By Bozo (aus.invest, alt.global-warming,sci.environment, aus.politics, sci.skeptic, sci.geo.meteorology,alt.energy.renewable, alt.politics.bush, alt.conspiracy) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
This is a politics newsgroup now. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |