I watched the sky clear the same way it builds this evening. Over towards the Shropshire border got brighter as the afternoon got later. It was interesting to see how the striations develop. I walked home contemplating the effect of the insolation of the individual huge buoyancy units overhead.

I wonder why climatologists can's see how the angle of incidence affects the heat system they study so inefficiently. They DO want a solution do they?

On Friday, 29 July 2016 21:20:55 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I watched the sky clear the same way it builds this evening. Over towards the Shropshire border got brighter as the afternoon got later. It was interesting to see how the striations develop. I walked home contemplating the effect of the insolation of the individual huge buoyancy units overhead.

I wonder why climatologists can's see how the angle of incidence affects the heat system they study so inefficiently. They DO want a solution do they?

I wonder if it is the sun as NASA insists or the abundance of carbondioxide that will be producing the cycle of localised cooling here and Worldwide?

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=88454

Needless to say the idots on here won't be watching anything like that. What do you suppose this means:
"Coccolithophores make their shells out of one part carbon, one part calcium, and three parts oxygen (CaCO3) “This carbon will eventually be respired as microbes break it down, typically at depth,� she said. “And that adds to an oxygen draw-down.�" or are we supposed to not suppose?

Let's just get this equation straight: one part carbon dioxide, one part calcium oxide, makes (CaCO3) and yes it does contain and three parts oxygen. But why are they behaving like fox news and slavery?

On Friday, 29 July 2016 21:20:55 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I watched the sky clear the same way it builds this evening. Over towards the Shropshire border got brighter as the afternoon got later. It was interesting to see how the striations develop. I walked home contemplating the effect of the insolation of the individual huge buoyancy units overhead.

I wonder why climatologists can's see how the angle of incidence affects the heat system they study so inefficiently. They DO want a solution do they?

2016/07/29 21:20 34.22N 129.84E Mwp 7.1 South Korea
2016/07/29 21:20 31.71N 137.15E Mb 6.0 Izu Islands, Japan region
2016/07/29 21:18 18.52N 145.53E M 7.7 Mariana Islands

In fact I shall go so far as to say that it is far from over... But...

Last night's forecasts are still on the board at the time of writing. Whichever ones you are familiar with you should take a look at and see how much things change for the next run. In fact there may well be a series of corrections -this is especially true for ground based data forecasts as the balloon and satellite data is more reliable than the stuff the flowerpotmen dig..

On Saturday, 30 July 2016 08:28:41 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 29 July 2016 21:20:55 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I watched the sky clear the same way it builds this evening. Over towards the Shropshire border got brighter as the afternoon got later. It was interesting to see how the striations develop. I walked home contemplating the effect of the insolation of the individual huge buoyancy units overhead.

I wonder why climatologists can's see how the angle of incidence affects the heat system they study so inefficiently. They DO want a solution do they?

2016/07/29 21:20 34.22N 129.84E Mwp 7.1 South Korea
2016/07/29 21:20 31.71N 137.15E Mb 6.0 Izu Islands, Japan region
2016/07/29 21:18 18.52N 145.53E M 7.7 Mariana Islands

In fact I shall go so far as to say that it is far from over... But...

Last night's forecasts are still on the board at the time of writing. Whichever ones you are familiar with you should take a look at and see how much things change for the next run. In fact there may well be a series of corrections -this is especially true for ground based data forecasts as the balloon and satellite data is more reliable than the stuff the flowerpotmen dig.

Mare's Tails this evening but no Highs forecast in the North Atlantic. No lasting ones at any rate. So what kind of a Cat 4/5 does that indicate. Something else entirely another large quake perhaps?

Never mind my prognostications, you should be outside looking at the way your own countryside develops clouds. There was a time when everybody did that and they did it together without the internet. Just imagine how successful they must have been without trolls and violent leaders. The good ones became respected and rich, had lots of sheep, built great ships and killed people all over the world.