uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 16, 02:16 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
Default climate/ weather/ ice

Greenland ice loss 40 trillion pounds bigger than thought
http://dailym.ai/2cHSdnK

Those of you averse to the Daily Mail source just briefly close your eyes
and imagine the Morning Star is guilty of the link.


  #2   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 16, 04:15 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default climate/ weather/ ice

On Friday, 23 September 2016 14:15:52 UTC+1, P.Chortik wrote:
Greenland ice loss 40 trillion pounds bigger than thought
http://dailym.ai/2cHSdnK

Those of you averse to the Daily Mail source just briefly close your eyes
and imagine the Morning Star is guilty of the link.


But doesn't that mean we have to think they thought what they originally thought was well though of?

Or is it just something to do with climate models again?
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 16, 04:44 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,066
Default climate/ weather/ ice

On 23/09/2016 14:16, P.Chortik wrote:
Greenland ice loss 40 trillion pounds bigger than thought
http://dailym.ai/2cHSdnK

Those of you averse to the Daily Mail source just briefly close your
eyes and imagine the Morning Star is guilty of the link.


Grin.

Unlike most, I don't have any problem with Daily Mail articles though.


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 16, 06:25 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
Default climate/ weather/ ice



"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
...

On Friday, 23 September 2016 14:15:52 UTC+1, P.Chortik wrote:
Greenland ice loss 40 trillion pounds bigger than thought
http://dailym.ai/2cHSdnK

Those of you averse to the Daily Mail source just briefly close your eyes
and imagine the Morning Star is guilty of the link.


But doesn't that mean we have to think they thought what they originally
thought was well though of?

Or is it just something to do with climate models again?
------------------------------------------
We aren't responsible for your turmoil though.

  #5   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 16, 06:31 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
Default climate/ weather/ ice



"Vidcapper" wrote in message news
On 23/09/2016 14:16, P.Chortik wrote:
Greenland ice loss 40 trillion pounds bigger than thought
http://dailym.ai/2cHSdnK

Those of you averse to the Daily Mail source just briefly close your
eyes and imagine the Morning Star is guilty of the link.


Grin.

Unlike most, I don't have any problem with Daily Mail articles though.


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
````````````````````````````````````````
Occasionally the paper lapses into unnecessary character assassinations i
feel.As an independent Right-wing publication they often have a go at the
Tories
and were just about the most virulently anti-BNP publication when that
political movement held some sway.



  #6   Report Post  
Old September 24th 16, 01:34 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default climate/ weather/ ice

On Friday, 23 September 2016 18:31:17 UTC+1, P.Chortik wrote:
"Vidcapper" wrote in message news
On 23/09/2016 14:16, P.Chortik wrote:
Greenland ice loss 40 trillion pounds bigger than thought
http://dailym.ai/2cHSdnK

Those of you averse to the Daily Mail source just briefly close your
eyes and imagine the Morning Star is guilty of the link.


Grin.

Unlike most, I don't have any problem with Daily Mail articles though.


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
````````````````````````````````````````
Occasionally the paper lapses into unnecessary character assassinations


Click bait.

and were just about the most virulently anti-BNP publication when that
political movement held some sway.


The late 1930's?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arctic ice update from the NSIDC. Ice now melting quickly. Dawlish uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 May 4th 10 08:03 PM
deniers trying to hide the decline in arctic sea ice cover Global Warming's Thin Ice Is Not Breaking, But Summer is Coming. Kelly Bert Manning sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 April 10th 10 05:43 PM
The Polar ice cap during the last Ice Age might not have been asextensive as previously thought crunch sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 23 December 3rd 09 12:37 AM
Older Arctic sea ice replaced by young, thin ice, says CU-Boulderstudy [email protected] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 January 14th 08 12:42 PM
Older Arctic sea ice replaced by young, thin ice, says CU-Boulderstudy [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 January 14th 08 10:57 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017