Suffering kidney failure arthritic like phantom symptoms and gout and having a well trained pair of eyes accustomed to occasionally looking up and that rather Celtic failing of wanting to know what is going on despite the failings of the various news-media and wants of our overlords...

And despite criticism of my admittedly not very sure early work...

I feel that I am in a position to say the relationship between the earth and the sky impacts all of us in ways that indicate in a wonderful way we are magnificent designs.

In the words of a politician, rapist and murderer:

"...if I make my bed in the depths, you are there. If I rise on the wings of the dawn, even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast even if I settle on the far side of the sea..."

Psalm 139. I think this is about stress trauma and the demons you carry with you when you have done a lotof things wrong in your life.

And it is about the sun shining too.
Speaking of which:

There is no just cause for assuming that the gravity of a sun is sufficient enough to generate radiation. A people that doesn't even attempt to understand his creation can not hope to guess at the various parts of it can they?

The only facts about the sun that we are aware of are that it is surrounded by planets that are too far away to directly affect the earth. There is no harmful radiation emanating from the sun that we are aware of that is not taken care of by the design of the atmosphere.

None the less the generation of jet-streams from hurricanes has to be accounted for. The sudden appearances of relatively obvious ice-clouds forming out of nowhere is proof of this creation.

That they can go on to produce the depressions that are the ground states of all the British is well known. It would appear that we are (hopefully) coming out of such a period finally. One that has lasted longer than an year.

It is interesting to find that this occurrence is going hand in hand with the end of the last empire noted in the prophecies in the various histories of the bible.

You would have to be interested in all of that enough to look for a quite protracted period; or have someone teach you the relevant details so that you can look them up for yourself.

Sorting out the gold from the dross will have to be your problem as only god or not god can help you with this. it is part of the master plan apparently "the sorting out the sheep from the goats."

With a good shepherd the sheep get protected. The rest of you get stung by Scorpios like me. Sort yourselves out.

:~DDD

And do it NOW!

We can't really hope to understand the vagaies of the physics of the material universe without trying to account for newton's fourth law:

All mass is attracted equally to all matter in all directions.
I am not going to pretend to have read Pricipia but I did come across that (in one of his Schollia IIRC.) What it means is that all tidal attraction is occupied by all other tidal attractions. And if you carefully consider Cavendish then you will realise the exacting meanings of action and reaction.

So there are apparently only the one scholium; an addendum to the initial book he brought in to defend himself against wet sheep.

In all the classic explanation, Newton makes no effort to explain an initial cause; for it is beyond all men to describe and we remain free to believe what we can understand about what we wish to study.

And in that case I wish to study the jump states of gravity's implications on British weather and world geo-physics including abreactions to the weather causing "politics" and accidents.

"We have explain’d the phaenomena of the heavens and of our sea, by the power of Gravity, but have not yet assign’d the cause of this power.

This is certain, that it must proceed from a cause that penetrates to the very centers of the Sun and Planets, without suffering the least diminution of its force;

that operates, not according to the quantity of surfaces of the particles upon which it acts, (as mechanical causes use to do,) but according to the quantity of the solid matter which they contain, and propagates its virtue on all sides, to immense distances, decreasing always in the duplicate proportion of the distances."

https://isaac-newton.org/general-scholium/

That is: the actions of a lever are different to the attractions and repulsions of a lever. Levering aside the various properties of radiation we are left with the one concept that it all goes to the stars. Whatever you make of that, any diminution has only a temporary stopping place.

The same is not true as far as we can tell for gravity. Any changes in the knock-on effects or domino theory has to reconciled with it wholeness or universal identity.

In short, then it must have required a superior force to get it all spinning as one. And thus we have its impacts on the weather which has an action and a reaction we can perceive in occasional singular behaviours not explained in the aegis of climate. Brooks for instance:

Mid September, Stormy, 17-24th
Early October Stormy, 5-12th.
Mid October Anticyclonic 16-20th
Late October Stormy, 24 Oct-3 Nov

Lamb:
AUTUMN [10th September - 19th November]:
First week (10th September onwards) driest of year on average, especially central & eastern areas.

Some years show tendency to a mid-September cyclonic / wet spell.

Localised heavy (thundery) rainfall resulting from slow-moving areas of low pressure.

Early / mid October can be 'two-faced': often 'unsettled' with rain/showers, but occasionally can give rise to anticyclonic, warm conditions, with southerly weather types lifting temperatures to 'near-record' levels.

Between 23rd October & 11th November, strong signal for wet/stormy weather with a sharp reduction in A-type weather; sharp reduction this type last week of October c.f. first week.

The faqs goes on to describe weather by leetters I am presuming the code is similar to tone I use, except that Barry and Perry try to present it as directions use I presume A type weather is sourced to Azores Highs but i have no idea what C, E & N types are.

http://weatherfaqs.org.uk/node/179

The fact that the origins of blocking weather was unknown at the time and the relative effects are still denied or ignored is for the reader to decide.. Before making up you mind what is obvious, consider that hot air rises and that Anticyclones fall.

(Maybe that explains negative radiation but I don't think so.)

Keeping off the grass is not something that means a lot to cyclones at Cape Horn. That is because it doesn't matter what the pressure is on Antarctica, it has to get the hell out of the way of a twin cored cyclone.

If you have been following the dispensations of BoM's Southern Hemisphere you will be familiar with the recent patterns of cyclones going ashore. And how they relate to derechos and volcanics.

It is unusual for long standing periods to occur when such cyclones reach the coast. For reasons best known to god, things have changed.

Notice how that huge system between Australia and Antarctica develops into what appears to be a blocking low on Saturday the 8th of October, 2016.

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/...ANTI/track.dat

What has happened is that the cyclone hitting the Cape has gone ashore, all the way across the continent causing the South African cyclone to deepen and draw out the High into itself.

The development along the coast from the air between 100 to 120 East is the most interesting thing. It all takes place at the same time as the compression of the Scandinavian High drops it 10 millibars from 150 to 140 (which is quite a lot of high pressure all things considered.) As far as that is possible to know:

Of course this is all speculation based on forecasts. Fortunately there is little input from the flowerpotmen in this series, so we can rely on generalities out that distance, for a given reliance on generalities.

On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 22:12:33 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Keeping off the grass is not something that means a lot to cyclones at Cape Horn. That is because it doesn't matter what the pressure is on Antarctica, it has to get the hell out of the way of a twin cored cyclone.

If you have been following the dispensations of BoM's Southern Hemisphere you will be familiar with the recent patterns of cyclones going ashore. And how they relate to derechos and volcanics.

It is unusual for long standing periods to occur when such cyclones reach the coast. For reasons best known to god, things have changed.

Notice how that huge system between Australia and Antarctica develops into what appears to be a blocking low on Saturday the 8th of October, 2016.

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/...ANTI/track.dat

What has happened is that the cyclone hitting the Cape has gone ashore, all the way across the continent causing the South African cyclone to deepen and draw out the High into itself.

The development along the coast from the air between 100 to 120 East is the most interesting thing. It all takes place at the same time as the compression of the Scandinavian High drops it 10 millibars from 150 to 140 (which is quite a lot of high pressure all things considered.) As far as that is possible to know:

Of course this is all speculation based on forecasts. Fortunately there is little input from the flowerpotmen in this series, so we can rely on generalities out that distance, for a given reliance on generalities.

So, now we come to the geography of jumpstates. It helps if you imagine the stable points in physics the gravity wells of Lagrangian Points as parallelogrammes rather like Feynman diagrammes.

In the beginning god started out with an amorphous mass of energy neutral chaos, think of that as a state of collapse, as a place with no polarities; where everywhere is an equal temperature and pressure described as the "ground state".

If you introduce enough spin to any part of it then every part of it must polarise. Would it be easier to think of creation as **** happening?

It certainly seems to be the state of the art in politics and finance six millennia after Adam.

Watch how the spaces between the deepest cyclones on here react to the change in polarity or energy values:

http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/char...Refresh+ View

They are huge neutral areas portrayed computationally as paralellogrammes that never seem to shrink more than the spaces between discs. It is easier to think of them as the eyes of the cyclones since most of those are "blind" most of the time.

They are the places where great forces are polarised. If you direct a jet of liquid or gas onto a solid object whose plane is 90 degrees to the stream, the pressure has to escape equally on all available directions and it does this instantly.

What happens is that as the wave set up from the confined mass escapes, it rolls past the ejecta in the way, as its force is distributed/lost. It has a vortex. And this is the same in all directions altering as the rate of perpendicular pressure on that region.

The pressure in these cases is what happens when adjacent winds develop next to one another. It is very simple physics and is well know when any single vortex is studied at its core.

You can see much the same thing as water pours into a bucket; more clearly as it falls onto a flat shelf and escapes. If the source is small and the landing area large the flow rate can be adjusted to produce a variety of shapes.
Criticality.

We already know that cyclones develop their power from the forces they already contain through the redistribution of heat as pressure. They are walking bombs. Now all we have to do is find out what happens to the noise they make: AKA Follow The Money.

Or as the Proverbs say about such continnua: As the **** from the manger, is the wealth to the farmer.

On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 16:27:10 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
We can't really hope to understand the vagaries of the physics of the material universe without trying to account for Newton's fourth law:

All mass is attracted equally to all matter in all directions.
I am not going to pretend to have read Pricipia but I did come across that (in one of his Schollia IIRC.) What it means is that all tidal attraction is occupied by all other tidal attractions. And if you carefully consider Cavendish then you will realise the exacting meanings of action and reaction.