On Saturday, 22 April 2017 11:37:54 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2017 17:19:26 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2017 16:52:56 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2017 00:21:27 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017 23:06:12 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017 01:40:54 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017 01:19:59 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
The salt residue from tropical storms falling back from low altitude remains at relatively high temperature thus sits on a colder, older layer and finally gets to Antarctica some 10 days to two weeks later. The first ten charts on here ought to suffice for what happens next:

http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/char...Refresh+ View

Category 4 cyclone Ernie 06-10 April 2017 with wind speeds peaking at 130 mph on the 7th has finally made it to Antarctica. It has been an interesting drive.

Does anyone know how ALO1 can be the first Atlantic storm of the season when it is only a tropical depression and Matthew was a full hurricane a few weeks earlier according to Tropical Storm Risk?

Just asking.

T+60 on this evening's Atlantic run is interesting. I dare say no one has any idea?

I don't suppose there is anyone here that happens to know which is heavier strong brine at about 29 C or freezing freshwater?

http://weatherlawyer.altervista.org/the-atlantic-too/

Massive contra rotation?

http://mkwc2.ifa.hawaii.edu/models/m...imtype=flas h

Forget Feynman, he might have been clever but he was an atheist so what are they looking for a god particle for?

On Friday, 21 April 2017 11:55:11 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I don't suppose there is anyone on here that can help me understand Feynma's diagrammes as applied tot hte solar system is there?
http://weatherlawyer.altervista.org/the-atlantic-too/

Thanks for posting that link. I really enjoyed it. Or as Feynman replies to Fred Hoyle, who has just remarked that "it's a depressing and sobering thought", "Well, it's good fun."

Feynman diagrams don't apply to the solar system. AIUI, they are theoretical bubble chamber diagrams describing the interaction of sub atomic particles.

They are part of the way creation works. But we tend to believe what we are told like I did a few days back:

It wasn’t until Arlene raised her head a couple of days ago that I realised how stupid I had been to swallow the story of Matthew, hook line and sinker last April 11th.

What gets me is that is was ten days after April the first (the day Britain puts aside to warn green young fools to be careful what they are told is true.)

http://weatherlawyer.altervista.org/...w/#comment-166

There is a clip in the Feynman video that shows the results of the first test of an A-bomb where all the trees in the vicinity are swept over in the blast.
They remain standing because they were pines and pines flex that way to shed Arctic blasts from snow covered needles where a deciduous tree would rotate itself out of the ground.

All creation is abut shedding energy as quickly as possible in the environment their genus is designed for. And I dare say Feynamn Diagrammes will answer for the cosmos as it will do for the weather charts too, except that Feynman believed the Einstein dynamic affects time. I don't, so the diagrammes will be wrong in that specific.

The energy will be shed in a different manner so we need to create a new version for creationists to bother learning. Sadly I can't do it. But it will be done one day.

The North Atlantic is flashing like a Christmas tree this run today 21 April 2017:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/w...ime=1492776000

Watch the blue tough from Arlene extend to Iceland from Greenland on a river-bed of salt:

https://earth.nullschool.net/#curren...-49.449,46.352

I find myself wondering what there is in meteorology that has been so long to be explained by meteorologists?

How fecking dumb do you have to be that you can't see what the hell the cause was?

It's amazing what you don't see when you have been told!

On Saturday, 22 April 2017 22:55:20 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Watch the blue tough from Arlene extend to Iceland from Greenland on a river-bed of salt:

https://earth.nullschool.net/#curren...-49.449,46.352

I find myself wondering what there is in meteorology that has been so long to be explained by meteorologists?

How fecking dumb do you have to be that you can't see what the hell the cause was?

It's amazing what you don't see when you have been told!

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/w...ime=1492819200
It is interesting how tonight's chart develops,

The first one shows the trough north of Arlene is a warm front on the salt track as it reaches through Britain to a cold front on the continent.

The second shows the salt stream has given up some heat or lost it to a lower level?
It is flexing below Iceland.

The third shows how the remains of Arlene's warm front is breaking up off Labrador.

The fourth chart shows how the development of a tornadic stream to the west affects the Atlantic.

Fifth Arlene has ruptured and is no more. The sky fills with debris and frost.

Six: The parallel fronts under Greenland all run to sets of minor earthquakes. I am tired and can't recall what those things are called. But I know that they are equally spaced some 80 degrees along the planet as the storm goes to earth.

Seven it is still clearing but another eruption signal earth's in the cold fronts on the coast of Europe again.

Eight, it is hard to imagine what a killer this sort of thing was in the days before penicillin. Yet with all that sunlight we had ricketts

Nine: I wonder where those fronts all earth. Swarms! that is the name for lots of earthquakes as the storm dies. I can go to bed now.