On 02/02/2017 07:39, Vidcapper wrote:


You really don't seem to like having your ideas questioned, do you?


Welcome to the wonderful world of Weatherlawyer!
I discovered this 10+ years ago.
As a result of this post my name will no doubt work it's way into his
posts for the next few weeks or so. I don't mind as it's quite
entertaining. Are you a wet sheep or a flower pot man?

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On Thursday, 2 February 2017 21:28:42 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:

If you are finding this to be gobbledegook ask god to help you understand me. It really is obvious stuff. You have no excuse if you have more sense than a wet sheep.

Get on with it.

Scientific dissent from Lysenkoism was formally outlawed in the Soviet Union in 1948.

One wonders how far the dawlish would like the clock turned back.

On Sunday, 5 February 2017 01:05:18 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
'dawlish'

Even more obsession amongst the gobbledygook.

On Friday, 3 February 2017 13:11:57 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 04:11:39 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:


Since there is no real high in situ, I am not calling a large earthquake for it.

That delta from earlier in the spell has got into the Med., it looks like the successor will too, just in time for the next spell -a volcanically active one (as opposed to the other volcanically active one.)

I don't suppose I could distract anyone with some Vanuatuan gobbledegook could I?
http://earthquaketrack.com/p/vanuatu/recent

Too much for the nobble son of Dawls
The Vanatuan is on a line that thralls
be to Ndol Island as unto the Chile rise
No less straightened than perforce
The line to Katubao Philippines
And into Gumdag Turkmenistan

Wiles 109km W of Te Anau, New Zealand
Lies perpendicular with Raoul Island, New Zeal
Some 100km South South East of theretoo

On Sunday, 5 February 2017 15:05:28 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 13:11:57 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 04:11:39 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:


Since there is no real high in situ, I am not calling a large earthquake for it.

That delta from earlier in the spell has got into the Med., it looks like the successor will too, just in time for the next spell -a volcanically active one (as opposed to the other volcanically active one.)

I don't suppose I could distract anyone with some Vanuatuan gobbledegook could I?
http://earthquaketrack.com/p/vanuatu/recent

Too much for the nobble son of Dawls
The Vanatuan is on a line that thralls
be to Ndol Island as unto the Chile rise
No less straightened than perforce
The line to Katubao Philippines
And into Gumdag Turkmenistan

Wiles 109km W of Te Anau, New Zealand
Lies perpendicular with Raoul Island, New Zeal
Some 100km South South East of theretoo

And more obsession amongst the gobbledygook.

On Sunday, 5 February 2017 15:05:28 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 13:11:57 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 04:11:39 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:


Since there is no real high in situ, I am not calling a large earthquake for it.

That delta from earlier in the spell has got into the Med., it looks like the successor will too, just in time for the next spell -a volcanically active one (as opposed to the other volcanically active one.)

I don't suppose I could distract anyone with some Vanuatuan gobbledegook could I?
http://earthquaketrack.com/p/vanuatu/recent

Too much for the nobble son of Dawls
The Vanatuan is on a line that thralls
be to Ndol Island as unto the Chile rise
No less straightened than perforce
The line to Katubao Philippines
And into Gumdag Turkmenistan

Wiles 109km W of Te Anau, New Zealand
Lies perpendicular with Raoul Island, New Zeal
Some 100km South South East of theretoo

Counting not the swarmes it is but two from five
And in the guise of fronts, makes of the five: seven too.
But tell me soothe nobble braine of what the count for swarmes do you maintain?

On Friday, 3 February 2017 13:14:34 UTC, Col wrote:
On 02/02/2017 07:39, Vidcapper wrote:


You really don't seem to like having your ideas questioned, do you?


Welcome to the wonderful world of Weatherlawyer!
I discovered this 10+ years ago.
As a result of this post my name will no doubt work it's way into his
posts for the next few weeks or so. I don't mind as it's quite
entertaining. Are you a wet sheep or a flower pot man?

Collectivism himself come back to be with us once more.
The toilet now is gone with VACANT lies the door

Hate whom ye list, for I care not;
Love whom ye list, and spare not;
Do what ye list, I dread not;
Think what ye list, I fear not;
For as for me I am not, but one that reckons not,
Whether ye hate or hate not,
For in your love I dote not;
Wherefore I pray you forget not;
But love whom ye list, for I care not.

Thomas Wyatt

On Friday, 3 February 2017 13:14:34 UTC, Assurnipple wrote:


Welcome to the wonderful world of Weatherlawyer!
I discovered this 10+ years ago.
As a result of this post my name will no doubt work it's way into his
posts for the next few weeks or so. I don't mind as it's quite
entertaining. Are you a wet sheep or a flower pot man?


http://memes.com/img/1561

01/02/17
1st Venus: 45.5° E
2 Venus-Mars: 5.4° N 10:11
4 First Quarter 04:19
6 Moon Perigee: 368800 km 13:59
7 Moon North Declination: 18.9° N 18:34

11 Full Moon 00:33
11 Pen. Lunar Eclipse 00:45
11 Moon Ascending Node 19:49

The timing of the previous spells had a repetitive value. (28th January 00:07 New Moon.) So now we wait.

18 Last Quarter 19:33
18 Moon Apogee: 404400 km 21:14
21 Moon South Declination: 18.8° S 20:50

26 Moon Descending Node 06:28
26 Annular Solar Eclipse 14:54
26 New Moon 14:58

01/03/17 Venus: 32.5° E
2 Neptune Conjunction 02:22
3 Moon Perigee: 369100 km 07:24
5 First Quarter 11:32

https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SKYCAL/SKYCAL.html

I have no idea how much weight the timings of the above events has but the times of the phases are considerably efficacious. Ken Ring is adamant the apsides have equal power.

Astronomers disregard the effects of planet becuase of distance but the fact is that copared to the luni-solar effect all other masses are ineffective (as is that of the sun.)

And of course the positions of the moon are completely disregarded by anyone who has ever read Newton, as the weight of the earth is 81 times that of the moon and infinitely more immediate.

Or as Dawlish might say and Col most certainly would say:
Baaaaa!

On Thursday, 16 February 2017 14:13:05 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:

'Dawlish'

The obsession continues. I'm so far under this one's skin that I can easily see the blood circulating. 😂😂😂😂