Missed being the warmest by 0.1C. The world continues exceptionally warm:

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/t...LB.Ts+dSST.txt

On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 13:49:44 UTC+1, wrote:
Missed being the warmest by 0.1C. The world continues exceptionally warm:

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/t...LB.Ts+dSST.txt

Are you sure that you are not confusing your brain with one of your tonsils and would the correct answer be yes?

On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 18:28:02 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 13:49:44 UTC+1, wrote:
Missed being the warmest by 0.1C. The world continues exceptionally warm:

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/t...LB.Ts+dSST.txt

Are you sure that you are not confusing your brain with one of your tonsils and would the correct answer be yes?

I suppose if I was a gentleman I would appologise for being spiteful to an idiot, knowing full well he has no defence against a miserable ******* of my ilk.
What the problem is for someone hooked on a dataset of statistics based on one or two periodical looks per set hour of the day is that any period covered is likely to have missed a hot spot.
Then there is the problem of parallax. If the heights of the early meteorologists varied the glass reading will have varied slightly.
And when we get to the differences of fractions to decimal point, the routines for recalibrating the temperatures in Farnheit and Centigrade considers how many decimal places?

That is before we get to the resetting of sites to suit the demands of the European Communisty. Let us take the new errr um... data as gospel.

What the idiot has suggested is that there has been no remarkable change in
GLOBAL Land-Ocean Temperature Index since 1880, some two decades after the start of the science of meteorology.

GLOBAL Land-Ocean Temperature Index in 0.01 degrees Celsius base period: 1951-1980 sources: GHCN-v3 1880-07/2019 + SST: ERSST v5 1880-07/2019 using elimination of outliers and homogeneity adjustment
Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = missing

On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 23:51:50 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 18:28:02 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 13:49:44 UTC+1, wrote:
Missed being the warmest by 0.1C. The world continues exceptionally warm:

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/t...LB.Ts+dSST.txt

Are you sure that you are not confusing your brain with one of your tonsils and would the correct answer be yes?

I suppose if I was a gentleman I would appologise for being spiteful to an idiot, knowing full well he has no defence against a miserable ******* of my ilk.
What the problem is for someone hooked on a dataset of statistics based on one or two periodical looks per set hour of the day is that any period covered is likely to have missed a hot spot.
Then there is the problem of parallax. If the heights of the early meteorologists varied the glass reading will have varied slightly.
And when we get to the differences of fractions to decimal point, the routines for recalibrating the temperatures in Farnheit and Centigrade considers how many decimal places?

That is before we get to the resetting of sites to suit the demands of the European Communisty. Let us take the new errr um... data as gospel.

What the idiot has suggested is that there has been no remarkable change in
GLOBAL Land-Ocean Temperature Index since 1880, some two decades after the start of the science of meteorology.

GLOBAL Land-Ocean Temperature Index in 0.01 degrees Celsius base period: 1951-1980 sources: GHCN-v3 1880-07/2019 + SST: ERSST v5 1880-07/2019 using elimination of outliers and homogeneity adjustment
Notes: 1950 DJF = Dec 1949 - Feb 1950 ; ***** = missing

On Saturday, 5 October 2019 07:39:04 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 01:57:17 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
More than 8 000 people were evacuated from dozens of towns on Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain after wildfire which broke on Saturday, August 17, 2019, near the town of Tejeda spread in two directions and scorched more than 1 700 (4 200 acres) of land by Sunday afternoon, August 18.

Authorities evacuated at least 40 towns near Valleseco on Sunday and initiated a huge operation with more than 700 emergency responders, 9 helicopters and 2 planes.

Canary Islands' regional president, Angel Victor Torres, said Sunday the blaze was neither contained nor stabilized or controlled.

By Monday morning, August 19, the fires spread to more than 3 400 ha (8 400 acres) and forced more than 8 000 to evacuate.

"We are facing a complicated situation in which the security of the people is the priority now," Torres said. He urged the entire population to follow safety instructions from emergency crews.
https://youtu.be/hBgknuq1T1Q
https://youtu.be/iJyObfGzxiQ

I must say the satellites used were quick on the draw. Obviously they hare well practiced
wildfire from Saturday, August 17, 2019, scorched 4,200 acres by Sunday afternoon, August 18.

It will be interesting to find out how many stone structures were melted in the heat https://watchers.news/2019/08/19/gra...e-august-2019/

https://docs.google.com/presentation...it?usp=sharing

https://watchers.news/2019/10/16/the...ber-9-15-2019/
New activity/unrest was reported for 1 volcano from October 9 to 15, 2019. During the same period, ongoing activity was reported for 13 volcanoes.

Lateiki, Tonga Islands
19.18°S, 174.87°W, Summit elev. 43 m

According to news articles the Tonga Geological Services Office of the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources stated that several observations indicating a possible eruption at Metis Shoal, also known as Lateiki, were reported during 13-15 October. Real Tonga pilots flying between Tongatapu and Vava'u observed the intermittent plumes rising to 4.6-5.2 km (15,000-17,000 ft) a.s.l. and drifting N on 15 October. Ash in the plumes was not identifiable according to the Wellington VAAC.

There follows a further list of the other known volcanoes but Volcano Chasing remains a black art today, as ever. The best advice I can offer anyone looking to experience first hand events will be to pay attention to psychosomatic events locally incidences of innocent people being shot by police in their line of duty is a striking factor of normality in todays events.

Less well publicised events will be seen in the increase of bad spelling online, erractic behaviour and the falling out of friendships. Children prone to quarreling and that sort of thing.

More pragmatically:
Because they can't understand what they are looking at, they can't understand what they should be looking for. What we want to be able to see is the nearest time to within the 6 hour period of meteorological charts, exactly when the Greenland High appears on the North Atlantic chart and the polar air in the specific cyclone (posted he http://weatherlawyer.altervista.org/the-long-sump/ ...that we are watching out) for breaks:

In this particular case the problem is complicated by the presence of Greenland Highs left over from the previous events. It is a good job I am able to help you through the difficulty, thanks be to god.

As with all things natural, when finally "you see it", it is obvious. For these puzzles, the "tell" is when the warm fronts are all over a particular region and the cold fronts move quickly to the coast of Europe. Since the meteorologists don't know what they are doing or claim to not know what is happening, we are able to listen to the forecasts telling of the coming changes.

They stop all mention of Lows or Cyclones and may start to mention warm fronts or periods. I am being polite if I claim they are arseholes. I can not believe they are ignorant.

I can not believe they are ignorant because I told them all about it many times. I was not alone in doing so. Most often, when god sees a need for a great truth to be explained to fools he uses grandiose, miraculous carpet-pulling from underneath the fat arses standing in the way of progress; using anyone willing to stand up to fools to do so.

On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 1:49:44 PM UTC+1, wrote:
Missed being the warmest by 0.1C. The world continues exceptionally warm:

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/t...LB.Ts+dSST.txt

NOAA have September as the warmest September on record.

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201909