Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() No-one is growing grapes in Yorkshire... Factually incorrect https://www.ryedalevineyards.co.uk/about https://www.yorkshireheart.com/the-vineyard/ Not the only ones. Graham Penzance |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/01/2020 11:14, Keith Harris wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 January 2020 10:37:47 UTC, Spike wrote: I expect the data-collectors of the group could easily say how far south from, say, the environs of Stoke-on-Trent one would have to travel to experience a 1.5degC increase in the climate - I'm guessing somewhere as far as Salisbury or Chichester. Co2 levels were high during the dinosaur period, that ended well! Correlation is not causation! Ask any passing asteroid...;-) Yes, we have never had it so good, well, not everyone, but at what cost, the problem is we are just guessing at how this is going forward, but we can see the direction? You'll need a powerful magnifying glass to see the current climate catastrophe on this graph: https://tinyurl.com/ClimateLast15000years -- Spike |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/01/2020 09:44, Spike wrote:
You'll need a powerful magnifying glass to see the current climate catastrophe on this graph: https://tinyurl.com/ClimateLast15000years For anyone who doesn't already know, this is just another piece of hackneyed flat-earther tat whose flaws have been exposed many times. See eg: https://www.carbonbrief.org/factchec...climate-change |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, 19 January 2020 09:44:16 UTC, Spike wrote:
On 15/01/2020 11:14, Keith Harris wrote: On Wednesday, 15 January 2020 10:37:47 UTC, Spike wrote: I expect the data-collectors of the group could easily say how far south from, say, the environs of Stoke-on-Trent one would have to travel to experience a 1.5degC increase in the climate - I'm guessing somewhere as far as Salisbury or Chichester. Co2 levels were high during the dinosaur period, that ended well! Correlation is not causation! Ask any passing asteroid...;-) Yes, we have never had it so good, well, not everyone, but at what cost, the problem is we are just guessing at how this is going forward, but we can see the direction? You'll need a powerful magnifying glass to see the current climate catastrophe on this graph: https://tinyurl.com/ClimateLast15000years -- Spike You need more than a magnifying glass to see the current climate on that graph since it stops in the year 2000. |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 17 January 2020 10:11:04 UTC, Spike wrote:
No-one is growing grapes in Yorkshire... Spike But they grow tea :-) Keith (Southend) |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/01/2020 14:55, Keith Harris wrote:
On Friday, 17 January 2020 10:11:04 UTC, Spike wrote: No-one is growing grapes in Yorkshire... Spike But they grow tea :-) Keith (Southend) https://twitter.com/YorkshireTea/sta...73098158256128 -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks. Web-site: http://www.scarlet-jade.com/ “Understanding is a three-edged sword. Your side, my side, and the truth.” [Ambassador Kosh] Posted via Mozilla Thunderbird on openSUSE Tumbleweed. |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:11:08 +0000
Spike wrote: Sorry, too many internet stalkers following me around, including one or two that have turned up on this group. That's your puffed-up ego talking, Burt. I was here long before you decided that: I'm getting the impression that that sort of information isn't welcome on this group (UKSW) as it conflicts with long-held beliefs, about which no questions are tolerated. and came here a trolling. |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/01/2020 11:17, JGD wrote:
On 19/01/2020 09:44, Spike wrote: You'll need a powerful magnifying glass to see the current climate catastrophe on this graph: https://tinyurl.com/ClimateLast15000years For anyone who doesn't already know, this is just another piece of hackneyed flat-earther tat whose flaws have been exposed many times. See eg: https://www.carbonbrief.org/factchec...climate-change "This modern temperature reconstruction, combined with observational records over the past century, shows that current temperatures in Greenland are warmer than any period in the past 2,000 years. That said, *they are likely still cooler* than during the early part of the current geological epoch – the Holocene – which started around 11,000 years ago." Which is, of course, exactly what is shown in the graph you are complaining about. -- Spike |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/01/2020 18:44, 'Jim' wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:11:08 +0000 Spike wrote: Sorry, too many internet stalkers following me around, including one or two that have turned up on this group. That's your puffed-up ego talking. I was here long before you decided that: I'm getting the impression that that sort of information isn't welcome on this group (UKSW) as it conflicts with long-held beliefs, about which no questions are tolerated. and came here a trolling. Well, 'Jim', your grip on reality really is slipping - need to blame your friend, the troll that cross-posted this message from the radio group. I'm sure you can guess who it might be: Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather,uk.radio.amateur Subject: Penzance - Coolish but more sunshine From: Oliver Charles Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:05:10 +0100 Xref: uni-berlin.de uk.sci.weather:465452 uk.radio.amateur:845484 On 22 Jun 2019 19:38:33 GMT "Norman Lynagh" wrote: Graham Easterling wrote: On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 4:31:09 PM UTC+1, Nick Gardner wrote: On 21/06/2019 23:03, wrote: The deep blue sky and crystal clear air brought high UV index today. It was forecast to be high. Tomorrow it is forecast to be very high. we shall see. Yesterday's UV max was 7.7, today's was 6.8. I suspect the lower UV today was because of the lack of cloud (reflection) despite a deep blue sky just like yesterday. The solar irradiance was also lower today with a maximum of 852 W/m² compared to yesterday's 1083 W/m². Depending on the number of and position of clouds, especially fair weather clouds, this can make a big difference to solar irradiation levels and at best can add about 1 on to the UV Index. -- Nick Gardner Otter Valley, Devon 20 m amsl http://www.ottervalleyweather.me.uk SE winds & high UV just don't go together. I notice the forecast keeps going on about very high UV, when it's a good deal lower during a few days late May when it reached 9 at Camborne on at least 2 days. Classic warm sector ridge & slight mistiness that we haven't really seen in June. No wonder people relate high UV to temperature. Not to mention windy condition = a big swell, some people even believe in the existence of gale force gusts. On top of which we're set to be stuck with Boris or Hunt. I thought the most depressing thing watching that Greenpeace girl (wearing a red dress & having told people on the door they were from Greenpeace which is known never to condone violence) being attacked by that thug, was that nobody came to her aid. These are the people who are running the Country (not just England, but Wales, Scotland & Cornwall). I'm sure I'm living in some sort of virtual reality & I'll soon come back to the real world. It's was bad enough having to put up with Abba tribute bands Apologies for drifting into grumpy old man mode! Graham Penzance ..........and I haven't heard one politician mention the current global atmospheric CO2 concentration of around 415 ppm. That's the most important statistic that exists at present and it's one that'll result in huge changes to human life worldwide during the remainder of this century. Part of me is glad that I won't be around to see it all happen and part of me wishes that I could be around to see it all happen. Whatever the detail, it won't be pretty :-( You shouldn't worry about it so much. Over in uk.radio.amateur we have a poster called Spike (his friends call him Burt) who can prove beyond doubt that Global Warming is not happening. I have xposted, as I'm sure he will be pleased to put your mind at rest. Over to you, Spike. -- Spike In the Climate Change belief system, only the future is certain, but the past is constantly changing. |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:58:04 +0000
Spike wrote: On 19/01/2020 18:44, 'Jim' wrote: On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:11:08 +0000 Spike wrote: Sorry, too many internet stalkers following me around, including one or two that have turned up on this group. That's your puffed-up ego talking, Burt. I was here long before you decided that: I'm getting the impression that that sort of information isn't welcome on this group (UKSW) as it conflicts with long-held beliefs, about which no questions are tolerated. and came here a trolling. Well, 'Jim', your grip on reality really is slipping - need to blame your friend, the troll that cross-posted this message from the radio group. I'm sure you can guess who it might be: snip, nothing of any importance Yes, you came here after the crosspost, but as I said YOU came, I was already here. So you were not followed (at least not by me) as you claimed. Get a grip, Burt. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
deg F in Summer and deg C in Winter | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
"Break the Grip of the Rip" National Campaign Kicks-Off | Latest News | |||
Rip currents kill more people than tornados, hurricanes, and lightning. | Latest News | |||
NOAA Highlights The Dangers Of Deadly Rip Currents | Latest News | |||
Davis Weather station accessory pricing Rip off | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |