Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a heads up for those with dark skies and in the North. Looking at
the data so far on the various aurora sites I'm not that hopeful but you never know. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Liquorice wrote:
Just a heads up for those with dark skies and in the North. Looking at the data so far on the various aurora sites I'm not that hopeful but you never know. anyone else got one AuroraWatch Alert, Thursday November 06 21:01 GMT 2003: Large increase in local activity, possible SSC. http://www.dcs.lancs.ac.uk/iono/aurorawatch/ This email has been sent by the AuroraWatch mailing list. To unsubscribe or change your alert status visit http://www.dcs.lancs.ac.uk/iono/auro...-bin/subscribe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:22:27 +0000, Shy Tot wrote:
anyone else got one AuroraWatch Alert, ... Yep, it was that message that prompted the "heads up". I can't decide if I did see something last night or not. The northern sky definately had a glow but was it auroa or just moonlight reflected from haze/cloud? -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:22:27 +0000, Shy Tot wrote: anyone else got one AuroraWatch Alert, ... Yep, it was that message that prompted the "heads up". I can't decide if I did see something last night or not. The northern sky definately had a glow but was it auroa or just moonlight reflected from haze/cloud? What time did you get yours? K |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:01:29 +0000, K wrote:
Yep, it was that message that prompted the "heads up". What time did you get yours? Picked it up at the next hourly mail run after it was sent, ie 22:00 It was sitting in my ISPs mailbox at 21:10:53. It spent 10 mins in a queue within Lancs Uni. Received: from tesla.dcs.lancs.ac.uk (tesla.dcs.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.3.40]) by ... Thu, 6 Nov 2003 21:10:48 GMT Received: from tesla.dcs.lancs.ac.uk (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by tesla.dcs.lancs.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51EA11F79; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 21:01:13 +0000 (GMT) -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Dave
Liquorice writes AuroraWatch Alert, ... Yep, it was that message that prompted the "heads up". I can't decide if I did see something last night or not. The northern sky definately had a glow but was it auroa or just moonlight reflected from haze/cloud? Got my alert not long after it was sent, just after 21.01 - I went to the Aurorawatch site, but it only showed a blip. When I went outside, I could see a few stars, and the moon was very bright so I persuaded myself not to get too excited. On the subject of the eclipse - I took some crap photos of one a while back with my film camera, so I'm going to have a go with the digital, conditions permitting. Am I right in thinking I need more or less daylight settings for this one? -- Anita Evans North Cumbria (anita[at]ra.evans.clara.co.uk to reply by e-mail) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:54:49 +0000, Anita Evans wrote:
On the subject of the eclipse - I took some crap photos of one a while back with my film camera, so I'm going to have a go with the digital, conditions permitting. Am I right in thinking I need more or less daylight settings for this one? Daylight white balance for sure. Exposure I donno, it's digital doesn't cost anything to take a picture look at it and erase it if it's rubbish. I'm going to have a go. I have yet to get an decent picture of the moon, always way to over exposed. Think I might use spot metering and see what the automatics think should be used and go from there. Might be a bit chilly though, 8C ATM but if the wind gets up that soon becomes an effective 0C or lower... Hopefully the large bank of cloud to the SE will stay there and not come up here. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Picked up my alert near dawn this morning. Rushed outside to see if there
was anything to see; dawn was just breaking but thought I could see a shaft of hazy glow somewhere near the pole star, that came and went a couple of times. Maybe it was the aurora, maybe it was not. I have seen an aurora once before, in 1952, and it has left a lasting impression in my memory for the whole of my life. I would very much like to see it again............. Richard. South Lincs "Anita Evans" wrote in message ... In message , Dave Liquorice writes AuroraWatch Alert, ... Yep, it was that message that prompted the "heads up". I can't decide if I did see something last night or not. The northern sky definately had a glow but was it auroa or just moonlight reflected from haze/cloud? Got my alert not long after it was sent, just after 21.01 - I went to the Aurorawatch site, but it only showed a blip. When I went outside, I could see a few stars, and the moon was very bright so I persuaded myself not to get too excited. On the subject of the eclipse - I took some crap photos of one a while back with my film camera, so I'm going to have a go with the digital, conditions permitting. Am I right in thinking I need more or less daylight settings for this one? -- Anita Evans North Cumbria (anita[at]ra.evans.clara.co.uk to reply by e-mail) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:54:49 +0000, Anita Evans wrote: On the subject of the eclipse - I took some crap photos of one a while back with my film camera, so I'm going to have a go with the digital, conditions permitting. Am I right in thinking I need more or less daylight settings for this one? Daylight white balance for sure. Exposure I donno, it's digital doesn't cost anything to take a picture look at it and erase it if it's rubbish. I'm going to have a go. I have yet to get an decent picture of the moon, always way to over exposed. Think I might use spot metering and see what the automatics think should be used and go from there. Might be a bit chilly though, 8C ATM but if the wind gets up that soon becomes an effective 0C or lower... Hopefully the large bank of cloud to the SE will stay there and not come up here. The moon is just a patch of bright sunlight, except during an eclipse of course, when it's in shadow. So I guess you'd use the same exposure as you would on an overcast day here on earth. Maybe try a couple of shots at dusk, and note the camera settings. With a bit of luck, that would also keep the surounding sky nice and black. hth -- Jon ____________________________________________ jondotrogersatntlworlddotcom ============================================ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Jon Rogers
writes Maybe try a couple of shots at dusk, and note the camera settings. With a bit of luck, that would also keep the surounding sky nice and black. This website looks quite useful http://webs.wichita.edu/lapo/photogr...nareclipse.htm -- Anita Evans North Cumbria (anita[at]ra.evans.clara.co.uk to reply by e-mail) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Aurora | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Possible aurora | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Aurora | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Aurora and noctilucent cloud together pics | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
aurora gallery moonlight surprise | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |