Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message .. . "Sean Mcdonald" wrote in message ... "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message .. . Alan, I have a vague memory, presumably from 1997, of the Ver drying up all the way down to St Albans, ruining the watercress beds. Is that right, or is it an older memory intruding? Not too sure about '97 but certainly '95 and '90 however water abstraction at Friars Wash was much higher then. Incidently I seem to remember that the lower levels of abstraction were due to the diversion of water from the Lea catchment around Luton. I could be wrong on this but if it were the case it would smack of robbing Peter to pay Paul given the drying out of the Lea. Ah, now things are beginning to fall into place. That would explain a lot. It can be argued that it's no great loss as far as Luton is concerned. Such a large part of the town was built in the catchment in the last 100 years or so, with so many houses in the flood-plain, but during the period when artesian abstraction was at its highest, so I guess there were few concerns about flooding. After 2000-01 it was clear that hundreds of houses, dozens of businesses, parts of the A6 and the inner ring road, were all at risk from flooding resulting from a combination of a rising water table and an extremely 'flashy' catchment. The one big loser in all this is the big lake in the rather attractive Wardown Park which has comprised extensive mudflats since August. Philip Eden I think that the water abstraction at Friars Wash was reduced by taking more water to Luton from Grafham Water so it should not have had any local effect in the Luton area. Alan |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.sci.weather on Sat, 8 Nov 2003 at 08:44:09, Paul Hyett wrote :
This is a good indicator of how far the water table in the chalk of the Chiltern Hills must have dropped ... especially notable because it follows the unprecedentedly high water table of 2001, and also bearing in mind that much less water is extracted from the chalk via artesian wells these days compared with 30 or 40 years ago. Tiny though it is, the river Chelt never seems to completely dry up, not even in 1976. One thing that *has* dried up though, according to the local paper, is our Spa water! -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham Email to pahyett[AT]activist[DOT]demon[DOT]co[DOT]uk |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When the River Lea was a mile wide | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Dry, dry, dry | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
540 CE: River Po flood - from a bad winter in Iceland? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Big River | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Atmospheric 'river' and flooding | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |