"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
...

Genisis 1:11

And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed,
and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in
itself, upon the earth: and it was so.


God was a pot smoker.

He created fog when he was stoned.



Michael McNeil

--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.



Michael. Your post mistifies me. I really feel you are a little potty.

"lawrence jenkins" wrote in message


snip
Michael McNeil

--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.



Michael. Your post mystifies me. I really feel you are a little potty.


My posts are being munged Lolly old boy. (I think the term is:
"munged"?)

Not a bad thing if it makes people cautious.

My headers will read "posted from Mailgate" or some-such but I've never
used netcom. Some of the stuff I'm alleged to have posted is unavailable
to readers of Google Newsgroups. They are also unreadable in Mailgate
but show up as unopenable messages. Not a very good forgery so I am not
that bothered. If I thought it would help I would complain to the
relevant authorities but it doesn't bother me -for now at least. If it
should do, tell me why.

I was getting some replies recently from skeptics using different names,
now they seem to have all gone away and a different set of admirers have
taken their place. All grist to the mill though, as if I am on the right
track with the things that I say, I will get better at it. If my
opposers ever come up with insuperable obstacles of reason and logic
they will be doing me a favour in getting me out of this lonely rut.

Until then it’s dark in here so anyone who fornicates with the McNeil
will have to do it in secret. When the light comes on I shall show the
buggers no mercy.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
news:254917f403b1f515ad1eed9dd3bad415.45219@mygate .mailgate.org...
"lawrence jenkins" wrote in message


snip
Michael McNeil

--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.



Michael. Your post mystifies me. I really feel you are a little potty.


My posts are being munged Lolly old boy. (I think the term is:
"munged"?)

Not a bad thing if it makes people cautious.

My headers will read "posted from Mailgate" or some-such but I've never
used netcom. Some of the stuff I'm alleged to have posted is unavailable
to readers of Google Newsgroups. They are also unreadable in Mailgate
but show up as unopenable messages. Not a very good forgery so I am not
that bothered. If I thought it would help I would complain to the
relevant authorities but it doesn't bother me -for now at least. If it
should do, tell me why.

I was getting some replies recently from skeptics using different names,
now they seem to have all gone away and a different set of admirers have
taken their place. All grist to the mill though, as if I am on the right
track with the things that I say, I will get better at it. If my
opposers ever come up with insuperable obstacles of reason and logic
they will be doing me a favour in getting me out of this lonely rut.

Until then it's dark in here so anyone who fornicates with the McNeil
will have to do it in secret. When the light comes on I shall show the
buggers no mercy.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG


Exactly!
If I can be of any help?

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
news:254917f403b1f515ad1eed9dd3bad415.45219@mygate .mailgate.org...
"lawrence jenkins" wrote in message


snip
Michael McNeil

--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.



Michael. Your post mystifies me. I really feel you are a little potty.


My posts are being munged Lolly old boy. (I think the term is:
"munged"?)

Not a bad thing if it makes people cautious.

My headers will read "posted from Mailgate" or some-such but I've never
used netcom. Some of the stuff I'm alleged to have posted is unavailable
to readers of Google Newsgroups. They are also unreadable in Mailgate
but show up as unopenable messages. Not a very good forgery so I am not
that bothered. If I thought it would help I would complain to the
relevant authorities but it doesn't bother me -for now at least. If it
should do, tell me why.

I was getting some replies recently from skeptics using different names,
now they seem to have all gone away and a different set of admirers have
taken their place. All grist to the mill though, as if I am on the right
track with the things that I say, I will get better at it. If my
opposers ever come up with insuperable obstacles of reason and logic
they will be doing me a favour in getting me out of this lonely rut.

Until then it's dark in here so anyone who fornicates with the McNeil
will have to do it in secret. When the light comes on I shall show the
buggers no mercy.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG


What a wonderful night for a moondance.

Michael. Your post mystifies me. I really feel you are a little
potty.

My posts are being munged Lolly old boy. (I think the term is:
"munged"?)
If I thought it would help I would complain to the
relevant authorities but it doesn't bother me -for now at least. If it
should do, tell me why.

Exactly!
If I can be of any help?

Michael sounds as if he is not in need of help - but I'd be grateful. Some
spammer has hi-jacked the gliding club e-mail address and is sending out
tons of spam, much of which is bouncing back to us. I have not looked at any
of the attachments of course, bur I gather they are advertising a highly
undesirable web site.

I'd be grateful to know what, if anything, to do about it - like how to
complain to the relevant authorities, for a start.

Anne

"Anne Burgess" wrote in message

Michael sounds as if he is not in need of help - but I'd be grateful. Some
spammer has hi-jacked the gliding club e-mail address and is sending out
tons of spam, much of which is bouncing back to us.

I'd be grateful to know what, if anything, to do about it - like how to
complain to the relevant authorities, for a start.

I'm no expert but someone on your team has a trojan in their computer
and possibly a key logger. Got to a reputable geek site such as Ziff
Davis' forums and ask there.

I cleared a load of junk with HijackThis and msn's own online antivirus
RAVantivirus or something. HijackThis allows you to post a log of all
that their programme finds on your computer on their forum where it can
be seen by experts. And it's free consultation and programme.

Make sure you have updated your security and antispyware. Also try
reporting the abuse or checking up on it through:
http://www.abuse.net/index.phtml


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

In article lgate.org,
Michael Mcneil writes:
"Anne Burgess" wrote in message

Michael sounds as if he is not in need of help - but I'd be grateful. Some
spammer has hi-jacked the gliding club e-mail address and is sending out
tons of spam, much of which is bouncing back to us.

I'd be grateful to know what, if anything, to do about it - like how to
complain to the relevant authorities, for a start.

I'm no expert but someone on your team has a trojan in their computer
and possibly a key logger. Got to a reputable geek site such as Ziff
Davis' forums and ask there.
snip

That's a possibility, but any spammer can put any address they choose as
the From address of their spams, and that's a more likely cause.

Looking at the full headers of the original spam, which hopefully will
be included within at least some of the bounce messages, would probably
enable the true source of the spam to be determined, so that their ISP
can be complained to.
--
John Hall

You can divide people into two categories:
those who divide people into two categories and those who don't

"John Hall" wrote in message

Looking at the full headers of the original spam, which hopefully will
be included within at least some of the bounce messages, would probably
enable the true source of the spam to be determined, so that their ISP
can be complained to.
Try reading her post again fool. And why cut the one bit you were
replying to? The part with the advice in it


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

In article lgate.org,
Michael Mcneil writes:
"John Hall" wrote in message

Looking at the full headers of the original spam, which hopefully will
be included within at least some of the bounce messages, would probably
enable the true source of the spam to be determined, so that their ISP
can be complained to.
Try reading her post again fool.

Are you always so polite to those trying to be helpful? Anyway, I've
read the original post again, and stand by what I said.

And why cut the one bit you were
replying to?

That _wasn't_ the bit that I was replying to.

The part with the advice in it

I snipped that because, if your diagnosis was wrong, then the advice you
gave would not be relevant.
--
John Hall "[It was] so steep that at intervals the street broke into steps,
like a person breaking into giggles or hiccups, and then resumed
its sober climb, until it had another fit of steps."
Ursula K Le Guin "The Beginning Place"

"Anne Burgess" wrote in message

Some
spammer has hi-jacked the gliding club e-mail address and is sending out
tons of spam, much of which is bouncing back to us. I have not looked at any
of the attachments of course, bur I gather they are advertising a highly
undesirable web site.

I'd be grateful to know what, if anything, to do about it - like how to
complain to the relevant authorities, for a start.
You could stop using IE for a start:
Sept 14, 2000 - Microsoft quietly shadows Web surfers across MSN sites
(persistence issue) news.cnet.com

"In response to an advisory posted by PCHelp, a Washington state
Internet technology consultancy, Microsoft said it redirects its various
Web properties' visitors to a single server that assigns them a unique
identifier. Microsoft last month patched its Internet Explorer browser
to give people more information about and control over the types of
cookies Web sites were attempting to place on their computers. The
complaint that spurred that repair had to do with third-party cookies
that worked across different domains. Microsoft confirmed that the IE
patch does not detect its own cross-domain cookies, so visitors are not
warned when the cookies are placed." (link courtesy of "pchelp")
http://accs-net.com/smallfish/

And do some work on your hosts files to fuse the outside cookies that
track you:
The short answer is that the Hosts file is like an address book. When
you type an address like www.yahoo.com into your browser, the Hosts file
is consulted to see if you have the IP address, or "telephone number,"
for that site. If you do, then your computer will "call it" and the site
will open. If not, your computer will ask your ISP's (internet service
provider) computer for the phone number before it can "call" that site.
Most of the time, you do not have addresses in your "address book,"
because you have not put any there. Therefore, most of the time your
computer asks for the IP address from your ISP to find sites.
http://www.accs-net.com/hosts/what_is_hosts.html



--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG