uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 10:30 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Aug 2003
Posts: 220
Default Months and years which had sub zero CETs


"John Hall" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Shaun Pudwell writes:
Sorry! Maybe I'll send an attachment next time.


Looking at it again, by avoiding the HTML (there's an option in OE to
switch it off, if that's the newsreader you are using) and putting each
year on a single line, you could have got the post down to not much more
than 300 lines, which wouldn't really have been a problem, rather than
the 9000 lines that it actually came to as posted.


his software says he is using Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
5.00.2919.6600

hope I'm not teaching my grandmother to suck eggs but it is

tools
options
send
and then just click the bit that says you want to send plain text

Jim Webster

--
John Hall

"Distrust any enterprise that requires new clothes."
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)





  #12   Report Post  
Old December 10th 03, 07:31 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2003
Posts: 978
Default Months and years which had sub zero CETs

In uk.sci.weather on Tue, 9 Dec 2003 at 17:18:43, Philip Eden wrote :

Shaun - you will have to be more careful in future. That size of that

post
was almost 1/2MB, in html as well. This is a text only newsgroup and many
wouldn't be best pleased to have to download all that.

I didn't even see Shaun's magnum opus because my newsreader is set to
strip out all posts of more than a given size.


Same here.
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Email to pahyett[AT]activist[DOT]demon[DOT]co[DOT]uk
  #13   Report Post  
Old December 10th 03, 09:16 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 121
Default Months and years which had sub zero CETs

Yes I know all about the IE options, however I had no time to convert my
nice looking WORD table into a nice looking text equivalent.
It wouldn't have made quite the same visual impact!

Anyway, I take note and will be more careful in future.

Shaun Pudwell.



"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"John Hall" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Shaun Pudwell writes:
Sorry! Maybe I'll send an attachment next time.


Looking at it again, by avoiding the HTML (there's an option in OE to
switch it off, if that's the newsreader you are using) and putting each
year on a single line, you could have got the post down to not much more
than 300 lines, which wouldn't really have been a problem, rather than
the 9000 lines that it actually came to as posted.


his software says he is using Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
5.00.2919.6600

hope I'm not teaching my grandmother to suck eggs but it is

tools
options
send
and then just click the bit that says you want to send plain text

Jim Webster

--
John Hall

"Distrust any enterprise that requires new clothes."
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)






  #14   Report Post  
Old December 10th 03, 01:55 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 121
Default Months and years which had sub zero CETs

Repost for those who missed it:

Record of summer time ( May - September ) temperatures derived from CET
record.

A hot summer is described as one where the CET value for the summer period
is 15.0^c or higher. The hottest summers are the ones where 15.50^c or
higher is recorded. The period 1700-1799 has the highest frequency of hot
summers but the period 1900-1999 has the hottest summers.

2000 - 2003 = 1
1900 - 1999 = 12
1800 - 1899 = 9
1700 - 1799 = 13
1659 - 1699 = 1

15.90 1947
15.76 1976
15.68 2003
15.68 1868
15.66 1846
15.62 1933
15.54 1911
15.52 1826
15.48 1995
15.48 1959
15.44 1781
15.42 1989
15.40 1949
15.40 1780
15.40 1779
15.34 1727
15.30 1762
15.30 1747
15.26 1808
15.24 1999
15.24 1865
15.22 1798
15.22 1726
15.20 1775
15.20 1731
15.10 1719
15.08 1997
15.08 1893
15.08 1857
15.06 1834
15.06 1760
15.04 1983
15.02 1804
15.02 1759
15.00 1970
15.00 1666
14.98 1743
14.98 1736
14.92 1800
14.92 1728
14.90 1818
14.90 1729
14.88 2001
14.88 1934
14.86 1990
14.86 1825
14.86 1801
14.84 1992
14.84 1975
14.84 1921
14.84 1831
14.84 1788
14.84 1701
14.80 2000
14.80 1718
14.80 1707
14.78 1899
14.78 1859
14.76 1945
14.76 1737
14.72 1998
14.72 1895
14.72 1733
14.70 2002
14.70 1982
14.70 1955
14.70 1679
14.68 1917
14.68 1884
14.68 1828
14.66 1730
14.62 1794
14.62 1732
14.62 1706
14.60 1878
14.60 1870
14.60 1835
14.60 1822
14.60 1746
14.60 1676
14.60 1669
14.58 1901
14.58 1858
14.56 1964
14.54 1937
14.52 1984
14.52 1973
14.52 1783
14.52 1761
14.50 1953
14.48 1940
14.46 1935
14.46 1875
14.46 1778
14.46 1750
14.46 1724
14.44 1969
14.44 1772
14.42 1960
14.42 1819
14.40 1991
14.40 1958
14.40 1943
14.40 1936
14.40 1806
14.40 1785
14.40 1686
14.40 1678
14.38 1994
14.38 1950
14.38 1833
14.38 1795
14.36 1842
14.34 1939
14.34 1896
14.32 1789
14.32 1757
14.30 1926
14.30 1741
14.30 1708
14.30 1684
14.28 1900
14.28 1704
14.26 1929
14.24 1961
14.24 1942
14.24 1906
14.24 1852
14.24 1784
14.22 1952
14.22 1827
14.22 1811
14.22 1777
14.20 1941
14.20 1889
14.20 1832
14.20 1709
14.20 1670
14.20 1667
14.20 1664
14.18 1944
14.18 1758
14.18 1734
14.18 1723
14.16 1898
14.16 1749
14.14 1932
14.14 1880
14.14 1753
14.12 1981
14.12 1748
14.12 1739
14.10 1971
14.10 1930
14.10 1914
14.10 1837
14.10 1815
14.10 1807
14.10 1797
14.10 1773
14.10 1738
14.10 1714
14.08 1938
14.08 1848
14.08 1847
14.08 1805
14.06 1980
14.06 1967
14.06 1925
14.06 1876
14.06 1867
14.06 1849
14.06 1791
14.06 1774
14.06 1752
14.02 1996
14.02 1919
14.02 1754
14.00 1908
14.00 1869
14.00 1712
14.00 1711
14.00 1710
14.00 1671
14.00 1668
13.98 1966
13.98 1897
13.98 1874
13.98 1764
13.98 1699
13.96 1905
13.96 1744
13.94 1957
13.94 1918
13.92 1948
13.92 1913
13.92 1787
13.90 1887
13.90 1765
13.90 1715
13.90 1683
13.90 1681
13.88 1988
13.88 1978
13.88 1872
13.88 1809
13.88 1796
13.88 1768
13.88 1742
13.88 1735
13.88 1702
13.86 1951
13.86 1803
13.86 1776
13.84 1886
13.84 1871
13.84 1861
13.84 1790
13.82 1786
13.80 1985
13.80 1864
13.80 1766
13.80 1721
13.80 1717
13.80 1680
13.80 1677
13.80 1662
13.80 1660
13.80 1659
13.78 1968
13.78 1904
13.78 1824
13.78 1745
13.76 1946
13.76 1802
13.74 1793
13.74 1771
13.72 1993
13.72 1769
13.72 1703
13.70 1979
13.70 1915
13.70 1866
13.70 1854
13.70 1850
13.70 1763
13.70 1720
13.70 1673
13.68 1956
13.68 1890
13.68 1705
13.68 1700
13.66 1881
13.66 1838
13.64 1924
13.64 1755
13.62 1916
13.62 1836
13.62 1829
13.62 1770
13.60 1987
13.60 1928
13.60 1722
13.60 1716
13.60 1682
13.60 1672
13.60 1665
13.60 1661
13.58 1963
13.58 1927
13.56 1910
13.56 1855
13.56 1821
13.54 1844
13.54 1843
13.54 1820
13.52 1965
13.52 1891
13.52 1856
13.50 1873
13.50 1851
13.50 1810
13.48 1974
13.48 1841
13.48 1792
13.48 1767
13.46 1756
13.44 1977
13.44 1813
13.42 1853
13.40 1931
13.40 1782
13.40 1713
13.40 1689
13.40 1685
13.40 1663
13.38 1923
13.38 1920
13.38 1892
13.36 1986
13.36 1903
13.36 1882
13.36 1862
13.34 1883
13.34 1751
13.30 1863
13.30 1830
13.30 1697
13.30 1691
13.30 1690
13.28 1839
13.26 1840
13.24 1962
13.24 1799
13.22 1954
13.22 1912
13.20 1922
13.20 1696
13.20 1688
13.12 1812
13.10 1823
13.10 1693
13.10 1687
13.08 1877
13.08 1740
12.98 1907
12.98 1885
12.98 1814
12.94 1972
12.94 1909
12.94 1817
12.92 1902
12.88 1894
12.80 1692
12.78 1888
12.72 1845
12.70 1698
12.62 1860
12.58 1725
12.50 1879
12.50 1674
12.40 1675
12.36 1816
12.10 1694
12.00 1695

Shaun Pudwell.

"Shaun Pudwell" wrote in message
...
Yes I know all about the IE options, however I had no time to convert my
nice looking WORD table into a nice looking text equivalent.
It wouldn't have made quite the same visual impact!

Anyway, I take note and will be more careful in future.

Shaun Pudwell.



"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"John Hall" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Shaun Pudwell writes:
Sorry! Maybe I'll send an attachment next time.

Looking at it again, by avoiding the HTML (there's an option in OE to
switch it off, if that's the newsreader you are using) and putting

each
year on a single line, you could have got the post down to not much

more
than 300 lines, which wouldn't really have been a problem, rather than
the 9000 lines that it actually came to as posted.


his software says he is using Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
5.00.2919.6600

hope I'm not teaching my grandmother to suck eggs but it is

tools
options
send
and then just click the bit that says you want to send plain text

Jim Webster

--
John Hall

"Distrust any enterprise that requires new clothes."
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)








  #15   Report Post  
Old December 10th 03, 02:05 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2003
Posts: 244
Default Months and years which had sub zero CETs

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:55:53 -0000, Shaun Pudwell wrote in


Repost for those who missed it:

Record of summer time ( May - September ) temperatures derived from CET
record.

snip the data

Thanks Shaun. That table looks fine in plain text and you have reduced the
number of lines from 9505 to 417, as well as decreasing the size of post
from 423 KB to only 8 KB with no loss of impact.

--
Mike Coleraine posted to uk.sci.weather 10/12/2003 14:05:56 UTC
My aurora images here http://www.mtullett.plus.com/29a-oct and
http://www.mtullett.plus.com/20-nov/


  #16   Report Post  
Old December 10th 03, 02:12 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 121
Default Months and years which had sub zero CETs

Most Recent Very Severe Winters ( December, January or February )
35 years of winters with a CET of 0.0 or less

The average gap between severe spells is 11 years. Obviously there are some
very big exceptions to this rule.

** = On Going

**16 1986-2002
7 1979-1986
16 1963-1979
6 1956-1963
9 1947-1956
7 1940-1947
45 1895-1940
5 1890-1895
9 1881-1890
2 1879-1881
1 1878-1879
4 1874-1878
24 1855-1874
17 1838-1855
8 1830-1838
7 1823-1830
3 1820-1823
6 1814-1820
18 1796-1814
19 1795-1796
7 1788-1795
11 1784-1788
4 1780-1784
4 1776-1780
13 1763-1776
23 1740-1763
24 1716-1740
7 1709-1716
11 1698-1709
3 1695-1698
1 1694-1695
10 1684-1694
8 1676-1684
17 1667-1676
7 1660-1667

If anyone would like the original tables that I have, then please just drop
me a request by email. I have a colour coded version of the CET data which
also includes El-Nino and La-Nina events, yearly average and summer time
average ( May - September ). There are all sorts of other information which
may be of interest too!

Shaun Pudwell.


"Shaun Pudwell" wrote in message
...
Yes I know all about the IE options, however I had no time to convert my
nice looking WORD table into a nice looking text equivalent.
It wouldn't have made quite the same visual impact!

Anyway, I take note and will be more careful in future.

Shaun Pudwell.



"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"John Hall" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Shaun Pudwell writes:
Sorry! Maybe I'll send an attachment next time.

Looking at it again, by avoiding the HTML (there's an option in OE to
switch it off, if that's the newsreader you are using) and putting

each
year on a single line, you could have got the post down to not much

more
than 300 lines, which wouldn't really have been a problem, rather than
the 9000 lines that it actually came to as posted.


his software says he is using Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
5.00.2919.6600

hope I'm not teaching my grandmother to suck eggs but it is

tools
options
send
and then just click the bit that says you want to send plain text

Jim Webster

--
John Hall

"Distrust any enterprise that requires new clothes."
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)








  #17   Report Post  
Old December 10th 03, 07:04 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,314
Default Months and years which had sub zero CETs

In article ,
Shaun Pudwell writes:
on gaps between years with calendar months with CET 0)
17 1667-1676


That should be 9 years.

Thanks for a very interesting list.
--
John Hall Weep not for little Leonie
Abducted by a French Marquis!
Though loss of honour was a wrench
Just think how it's improved her French. Harry Graham (1874-1936)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Januaries with sub-zero CETs Gavin Staples uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 June 5th 05 09:09 AM
Months with CETs below zero Gavin Staples uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 May 26th 05 10:18 AM
Sub Zero end of the weekend for the South Rupert uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 20 February 22nd 05 03:33 PM
Sub Zero Steve Jones uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 9 November 28th 04 01:28 PM
Re; Re; Months and years which had sub zero CETs Gavin Staples uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 December 9th 03 07:39 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017