Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Evert Wesker" wrote in message ... Ladies, Gentlemen The winter (= December, January, February) data from Holland. Up to 1899 it is the so called "Labrijn reeks", after that the data from De Bilt. The range is not homogeneous. However, it gives you a nice idea. 1990 6.0 1989 5.6 1975 5.5 1998 5.4 1737 5.3 1796 5.3 1995 5.3 1834 5.2 1846 5.2 2000 5.0 1739 5.0 1988 5.0 1877 4.9 1822 4.9 1869 4.9 1734 4.8 1935 4.8 2002 4.8 1749 4.7 1863 4.7 1884 4.6 1957 4.6 1916 4.6 1756 4.5 1764 4.5 1825 4.5 1899 4.5 1920 4.4 1759 4.4 1724 4.4 1866 4.3 1999 4.3 1779 4.2 1967 4.2 1974 4.2 1790 4.1 1925 4.1 1948 4.1 1761 4.1 2001 4.1 1733 4.0 1730 3.9 1994 3.9 1835 3.9 1867 3.9 1923 3.9 1930 3.8 1992 3.8 1807 3.8 1817 3.8 1859 3.8 1921 3.8 1750 3.8 1824 3.8 1943 3.8 1915 3.8 1993 3.7 1912 3.7 1898 3.7 1913 3.7 1961 3.7 1949 3.7 1853 3.6 1950 3.6 1878 3.6 1910 3.6 1937 3.6 1873 3.5 1874 3.5 1976 3.5 1791 3.5 1983 3.5 1837 3.5 1852 3.5 1911 3.5 1980 3.5 1708 3.4 1735 3.4 1798 3.4 1840 3.4 1711 3.3 1812 3.3 1747 3.3 1851 3.3 1926 3.3 1736 3.3 1883 3.3 1844 3.2 1775 3.2 1828 3.2 1914 3.2 1732 3.2 1885 3.2 1927 3.2 1977 3.2 1936 3.2 1960 3.2 1972 3.2 1952 3.1 1849 3.1 1903 3.1 1773 3.1 1774 3.1 1984 3.1 1958 3.0 1973 3.0 1978 3.0 1770 3.0 1938 3.0 1713 3.0 1905 3.0 1966 3.0 1932 2.9 1882 2.9 1794 2.9 1806 2.8 1971 2.8 1819 2.8 1752 2.8 1906 2.8 1944 2.8 1714 2.7 1793 2.7 1872 2.7 1894 2.7 1939 2.7 1843 2.7 1919 2.7 1946 2.7 1962 2.7 1788 2.6 1839 2.6 1862 2.6 1783 2.6 1981 2.6 1721 2.4 1818 2.4 1928 2.4 2003 2.4 1720 2.4 1857 2.4 1902 2.4 1738 2.3 1741 2.3 1868 2.3 1968 2.3 1896 2.3 1945 2.3 1951 2.3 1772 2.3 1728 2.3 1769 2.3 1836 2.3 1892 2.3 1918 2.3 1959 2.3 1804 2.2 1965 2.2 1722 2.2 1715 2.2 1754 2.2 1991 2.2 1742 2.1 1856 2.1 1933 2.1 1719 2.1 1727 2.1 1826 2.1 1723 2.0 1833 2.0 1955 2.0 1931 2.0 1881 1.9 1753 1.9 1832 1.9 1908 1.9 1997 1.9 1710 1.9 1731 1.9 1889 1.9 1953 1.8 1954 1.8 1758 1.8 1842 1.8 1707 1.8 1922 1.8 1787 1.7 1801 1.7 1762 1.7 1782 1.7 1900 1.7 1858 1.6 1748 1.6 1876 1.6 1897 1.6 1969 1.6 1725 1.6 1864 1.6 1808 1.6 1811 1.6 1712 1.5 1745 1.5 1792 1.5 1904 1.5 1986 1.5 1987 1.5 1771 1.5 1751 1.4 1815 1.4 1890 1.4 1860 1.4 1901 1.4 1887 1.3 1743 1.3 1934 1.2 1870 1.1 1875 1.1 1797 1.1 1802 1.1 1781 1.1 1964 1.1 1982 1.1 1765 1.0 1780 1.0 1827 1.0 1893 1.0 1831 0.9 1717 0.9 1810 0.9 1861 0.9 1850 0.9 1907 0.9 1786 0.8 1909 0.8 1809 0.8 1706 0.8 1776 0.8 1816 0.8 1886 0.8 1767 0.7 1777 0.7 1813 0.7 1744 0.7 1766 0.7 1821 0.6 1829 0.5 1768 0.4 1847 0.4 1778 0.4 1718 0.4 1888 0.3 1854 0.3 1924 0.3 1879 0.3 1880 0.2 1985 0.2 1848 0.2 1956 0.2 1917 0.1 1726 0.1 1746 0.1 1865 0.1 1970 0.1 1895 0.0 1941 -0.1 1755 -0.1 1996 -0.1 1757 -0.1 1760 -0.1 1785 -0.2 1729 -0.4 1871 -0.6 1855 -0.6 1820 -0.7 1841 -0.7 1979 -0.8 1800 -1.0 1740 -1.1 1763 -1.1 1803 -1.2 1891 -1.4 1709 -1.4 1929 -1.5 1942 -1.5 1838 -1.6 1805 -1.6 1814 -1.6 1716 -1.7 1799 -1.8 1845 -1.8 1789 -1.9 1940 -1.9 1795 -2.0 1823 -2.2 1784 -2.3 1947 -2.4 1830 -3.1 1963 -3.1 Mazzel & broge / kind regards, Evert Wesker Amsterdam, The Netherlands http://come.to/wesker (redirect URL, no adv's), or http://www.euronet.nl/users/e_wesker/ I like this. It just shows the difference of being on the other side of the North Sea. A whole winter with a mean below 0C is exceptional for us and has only been done just 3 times. 1963, 1740 and 1684. You have a substantial list below 0C. I see that 1963 is your most ferocious winter, that here came in at about -0.3 on a CET. You had a winter mean of -3.1C. I wonder how your figure for 1740 is so much "warmer" than 1963. 1740 for us was much colder than 1963. -- ************************************************** ************************** ************************************************** * Gavin Staples. website updated regularly www.gavinstaples.com "I have friends in overalls whose friendship I would not swap for the favor of the kings of the world". ~Thomas A. Edison All outgoing emails are checked for viruses by Norton Internet Security Professional 2004. ************************************************** ************************** ************************************************** ** |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Gavin Staples writes: "Evert Wesker" wrote in message ... Ladies, Gentlemen The winter (= December, January, February) data from Holland. Up to 1899 it is the so called "Labrijn reeks", after that the data from De Bilt. The range is not homogeneous. However, it gives you a nice idea. snip I like this. So do I, but there was no need to quote the whole 300+ lines of it. It just shows the difference of being on the other side of the North Sea. A whole winter with a mean below 0C is exceptional for us and has only been done just 3 times. 1963, 1740 and 1684. You have a substantial list below 0C. I see that 1963 is your most ferocious winter, that here came in at about -0.3 on a CET. You had a winter mean of -3.1C. I wonder how your figure for 1740 is so much "warmer" than 1963. 1740 for us was much colder than 1963. I thought that 1740 and 1963 were thought to be about equal in terms of CET? Unless that was for Jan-Feb only? -- John Hall "One half of the world cannot understand the pleasures of the other." From "Emma" by Jane Austen (1775-1817) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 14:21:47 +0000, John Hall
wrote: I thought that 1740 and 1963 were thought to be about equal in terms of CET? Unless that was for Jan-Feb only? -- John Hall I took a look at the data: December 1739 wasn't very cold in The Netherlands. Jan-Feb were about on par with 1963. That explains a lot I think. Next to that: The spring of 1740 (especially May) was very cold and the summer was quite miserable as well. That explains why 1740 was an "annus horribilis" for the farmers all over western Europe. For the whole range (for all months) see: http://www.euronet.nl/users/e_wesker/weer/labrijn.html NB: It is NOT homogeneous, but it gives you a very nice impression. Mazzel & broge / kind regards, Evert Wesker Amsterdam, The Netherlands http://come.to/wesker (redirect URL, no adv's), or http://www.euronet.nl/users/e_wesker/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gavin Staples" schreef in bericht ... "Evert Wesker" wrote in message ... I like this. It just shows the difference of being on the other side of the North Sea. A whole winter with a mean below 0C is exceptional for us and has only been done just 3 times. 1963, 1740 and 1684. You have a substantial list below 0C. snip The Netherlands certainly have a more continential climate than Britain, Gavin. A few miles east can do a lot, I often compare our data with German sites, just beyond the border. Of course the North Sea also has its influences. I sometimes wonder how the climate on both sides of the North Sea would change if the Sea weren't there. Oh, who knows ;-)). Pity a life-time can be too short to discover. Wijke SE Flevopolder ms 3 m asl The Netherlands CAVOK :-) -- snowcover -- Tmin ms 4.4 C - Tc ms 0.9 C -- E 4 - 1021,9 hPa |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thames water drought order? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
January CET's in Descending order | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
winter in Holland in descending order | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
February CET's in Descending order | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
January CET's in Descending order | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |