Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to say I am starting to find it a bit tedious that every 6 hours
(usually GFS based) someone posts that it is going to be one of the coldest spells for years or that it's completely collapsing. How many times do the experts have to say that models are an indication of the trends and any one taken in isolation can only be that at best. FACT: It will be cold next week. FACT: It will most likely snow in lots of places FACT: It will probably breakdown at some stage in the next 1-6 weeks! Much more detail is pure conjecture, so let's be patient, look at the charts and watch the forecasts but cut out the silly stuff! Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am beginning to only trust GFS for 3 days at the most. Anything more than that and they really
haven't got a clue. -- Brendan DJ Murphy Rayleigh, Essex, 51:34N 0:36E 30m asl Castle Point Astronomy Club http://www.cpac.org.uk "Dave. C" wrote in message ... I have to say I am starting to find it a bit tedious that every 6 hours (usually GFS based) someone posts that it is going to be one of the coldest spells for years or that it's completely collapsing. How many times do the experts have to say that models are an indication of the trends and any one taken in isolation can only be that at best. FACT: It will be cold next week. FACT: It will most likely snow in lots of places FACT: It will probably breakdown at some stage in the next 1-6 weeks! Much more detail is pure conjecture, so let's be patient, look at the charts and watch the forecasts but cut out the silly stuff! Dave |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not just the GFS model. I don't think we can trust any model after
about 3 days. "Brendan DJ Murphy" wrote in message ... I am beginning to only trust GFS for 3 days at the most. Anything more than that and they really haven't got a clue. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brendan DJ Murphy" wrote in message ... I am beginning to only trust GFS for 3 days at the most. Anything more than that and they really haven't got a clue. -- .... don't just 'blame' the GFS: I think Philip Eden mentioned a couple of days ago that the models were entering a period of what I would call: 'which-way-shall-we-fall' mode. There is a major change of long-wave type about to be performed, and the slightest synoptic-scale 'wobble' loaded onto the broader-scale change could kick it one way or another. As you rightly say, best not to trust the detail (and perhaps the broad thrust), beyond 3 or so days - an 'interesting' week coming up! Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you find it boring Dave give this newsgroup a miss untill the cold spell
breaks.Most of us who post here are very excited about the coming event.And excitment makes us say silly things. It is our last hold on childhood.And that is something i don't want too loose :-) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "SSpiers" wrote in message ... If you find it boring Dave give this newsgroup a miss untill the cold spell breaks.Most of us who post here are very excited about the coming event.And excitment makes us say silly things. It is our last hold on childhood.And that is something i don't want too loose :-) hate to say it but I tend to follow this group MORE when the weather gets potentially 'interesting'. OK there are times when the enthusiasm for extreme conditions can be a tad trying (but hey, genuine enthusiasm about anything is worth cherishing:-)) but the quality of some of the discussion and forecasting more than makes up for it. Jim Webster |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's ok, I know that. Anyone who's read my posts in the last three years
will know I'm no killjoy. It's just the suicidal "it's all gone wrong" stuff when anyone can see that it hasn't on the available info that is daft - not childish. Take care, Dave. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "SSpiers" wrote in message ... If you find it boring Dave give this newsgroup a miss untill the cold spell breaks.Most of us who post here are very excited about the coming event.And excitment makes us say silly things. It is our last hold on childhood.And that is something i don't want too loose :-) Well said that ma..erm..... child! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Well said that ma..erm..... child! ....I'll get me coat ! (sorry,sledge, hopefully). |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although GFS did hint at this cold spell at 15 days and were consistent for
it coming up to about 7 days. I was at a seminar not long ago which showed how the models became more and reliable as you got closer to the event except for a little wobble for some reason around day 4. Maybe we have seen have the 4 day wobblys Stan "Brendan DJ Murphy" wrote in message ... I am beginning to only trust GFS for 3 days at the most. Anything more than that and they really haven't got a clue. -- Brendan DJ Murphy Rayleigh, Essex, 51:34N 0:36E 30m asl Castle Point Astronomy Club http://www.cpac.org.uk "Dave. C" wrote in message ... I have to say I am starting to find it a bit tedious that every 6 hours (usually GFS based) someone posts that it is going to be one of the coldest spells for years or that it's completely collapsing. How many times do the experts have to say that models are an indication of the trends and any one taken in isolation can only be that at best. FACT: It will be cold next week. FACT: It will most likely snow in lots of places FACT: It will probably breakdown at some stage in the next 1-6 weeks! Much more detail is pure conjecture, so let's be patient, look at the charts and watch the forecasts but cut out the silly stuff! Dave |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Blah, Blah, blah; check. To go beyond the limits of exaggerationwhere no Mann has gone before. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Boring January | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Boring oddity in 2003 rainfall | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Boring weather, a thing of the future? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Boring cloudy High | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |